Tammi Smith -The Charges

[saba]

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/042012/m5181473.pdf

4/2/2012 MINUTE ENTRY

The Court has received and reviewed the State’s Expedited Motion Requesting Court Ordered Defense Interview, filed March 19, 2012.

IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Craig Cherry shall participate in a defense interview on April 5, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.

 

[saba]

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/042012/m5184352.pdf

4/3/2012 HEARING

...Discussion is held as to the State’s Motion to Preclude Mental Health Testimony. For the reasons stated on the record,

IT IS ORDERED conditionally denying the State’s Motion without prejudice.

Discussion is held as to witnesses that do not want to testify in front of cameras.

IT IS ORDERED that no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 12, 2012, counsel shall submit tothe Court lists of personsRule 609
who do not wish to testify before the media and the reason.

...By agreement of the parties, Eight jurors and three alternates shall be picked for the jury.

Defendant’s Rule 609 Notice is discussed.

The State shall file a response to the Rule 609 Notice prior to April 17, 2012.

Discussion is held as to the State’s Motion for Protective Order Against Defense Counsel Regarding Extrajudicial Statements to the Media and the Motion to Seal.

Defendant has until April 13, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. to file Responses to the motions...



eta-AZLawyer has an explanation of Rule 609 upthread in post 213

 

[saba]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseSearch.asp (CR2010-101760)



4/6/2012 Response - Party (002)

NOTE: to State’s Motion for Protective Order

4/6/2012 Motion - Party (002)

NOTE: FOR RECONSIDERATION OF STATE’S REQUEST FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING PRIOR TO JURY SELECTION

 

[saba]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseSearch.asp (CR2010-101760)

4/6/2012 NOT - Notice - Party (002)
NOTE: DEFENDANT’S SECOND RULE 609 /- Craig Cherry

 

[saba]

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/042012/m5188083.pdf


4/5/2012 STATUS CONFERENCE

...Court and counsel discuss pretrial matters...

...Tyler Harrison is present on behalf of the victim, Logan McQueary...

...Counsel are ready to proceed to trial...

...A plea offer was made and rejected. A counter offer was made by Defendant to the State...

 

[saba]

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/042012/m5188083.pdf


4/5/2012 STATUS CONFERENCE

...Court and counsel discuss pretrial matters...

...Tyler Harrison is present on behalf of the victim, Logan McQueary...

...Counsel are ready to proceed to trial...

...A plea offer was made and rejected. A counter offer was made by Defendant to the State...

A little rant- This post represents my opinion and feeling about what was important in a much longer order. Recently I saw this exact post elsewhere and, of course, under another name. Gabe's case has been fraught from the git by phony posters, internet troll wars, and people generally who don't care to think for themselves. I hope so much that we will one day learn the truth about Gabriel. Along the way, I guess we also learn the truth about ourselves.

 

[smokey]

Baby Gabriel cases back in the courts

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/cop_shop/article_2496cd30-84fd-11e1-9e2b-001a4bcf887a.html

 

[uph4you]

How come there have been no posts about court after 4/5/2012.

 

[saba]

How come there have been no posts about court after 4/5/2012.

We were waiting for you! Seriously, there haven't been any Minute Entries since 4/5/2012.

 

[saba]

6/5/2012 Response to Defendant's Motion - Party (002)
NOTE: STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FOR NEW TRIAL OR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL


6/5/2012 Motion - Party (002)
NOTE: TO STRIKE STATES ALLEGATION OF MULTIPLE OFFENSES COMMITTED ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS PURSUANT TO ARS §13-703


Older Motions....

5/24/2012 Motion - Party (002)
NOTE: FOR NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 24.1/MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DIRECTED VERDICT UNDER RULE 20 /MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL UNDER RULE 20(b)

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseSearch.asp (CR2010-101760)

 

[momtective]

Can't wait to see the State's response to the motion for a new trial. :dance:

 

[artsy1]

I hope CourtTV covers the Jun 18 oral arguments and the Jul 6 sentencing live!

 

[saba]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseSearch.asp (CR2010-101760)


6/6/2012 Motion - Party (002)

NOTE: DEFENDANTS SUPPLEMENTAL/ TO Strike State’s Allegation of Multiple Offenses Committed on Multiple Occasions pursuant to A.R.S. §13-703



6/6/2012 Response to Defendant's Motion - Party (002)

NOTE: SUPPLEMENT TO STATE’S/ TO STRIKE STATE’S ALLEGATION OF MULTIPLE OFFENSES COMMITTED ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS PURSUANT TO A.R.S. §13-703

 

[saba]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseSearch.asp (CR2010-101760 or Tammi Smith)

6/11/2012 Motion - Party (002)

NOTE: SUPPLEMENTAL FILING FOR / FOR NEW TRIAL

 

[artsy1]

So, it looks like on Monday, June 18, will solely be oral arguments on ALL the motions filed on both sides. Then, providing the Judge doesn't give a directed verdict of not guilty, or agree to a new trial, Tammi moves on to sentencing on July 6 - and at that time will be determined if she gets probation or jail time. And if the Judge sentences her to jail time, he will decide on July 6 how long.

My understanding that nothing on June 18 determines jail or probation - just ruling on the motions.

Correct, anyone?

 

[saba]

So, it looks like on Monday, June 18, will solely be oral arguments on ALL the motions filed on both sides. Then, providing the Judge doesn't give a directed verdict of not guilty, or agree to a new trial, Tammi moves on to sentencing on July 6 - and at that time will be determined if she gets probation or jail time. And if the Judge sentences her to jail time, he will decide on July 6 how long.

My understanding that nothing on June 18 determines jail or probation - just ruling on the motions.

Correct, anyone?

My understanding is that if Judge K rules that Tammi's convictions are for separate crimes (the 703 motion), then some period of incarceration is mandatory under AZ law. If they are not separate crimes, then the judge can give her probation.

 

[saba]

http://www.courtminutes.maricopa.gov/docs/Criminal/062012/m5297883.pdf


6/18/2012 ORAL ARGUMENT

IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion for New Trial Under Rule 24.1/Motion for Reconsideration of Directed Verdict Under Rule 20/Motion for Judgment of Acquittal Under Rule 20(b).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion to Strike State’s Allegation of Multiple Offenses Committed on Multiple Occasions Pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-703.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED affirming Sentencing set for July 6, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. before this Division.

 

[saba]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseSearch.asp (CR2010-101760)


6/27/2012 Notice Of Filing - Party (002)

NOTE: LETTERS



6/27/2012 Motion To Continue - Party (002)

NOTE: SENTENCING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 6, 2012

 

[saba]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/caseSearch.asp (CR2010-101760)


6/28/2012 Motion To Continue - Party (002)

NOTE: RESPONSE TO STATE’S MOTION TO CONTINUE

6/28/2012 Response - Party (002)

NOTE: AMENDED RESPONSE TO STATE’S MOTION TO CONTINUE

 

[saba]

http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CriminalCourtCases/
(CR2010-101760)


6/29/2012 Notice Of Filing - Party (002)

NOTE: SUPPLEMENTAL/ OF LETTERS



6/29/2012 Request - Party (002)

NOTE: DEFENSE / FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON STATE’S MOTION TO CONTINUE




6/28/2012 Notice Of Filing - Party (002)

NOTE: SUPPLEMENTAL/ LETTERS



6/28/2012 Reply - Party (002)

NOTE: STATE’S/ TO DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO STATE’S MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 6, 2012