For the record:
Re: KRT
My point is that she has chosen one of the most conservative forms of Islamic attire. It appears, the only thing she doesn't cover is her hands and part of her face. Just an observation...meaning among the many choices for Islamic women, from western or popular current fashion, to a simple scarf, a more elaborate hijab (covering the head and neck,) to a hijab & long heavy & layered clothing down to covering the toes, and finally to cover everything except her eyes...she chose the 2nd most conservative.
Point here is that she obviously believes that she as a woman, as opposed to men, ought to be covering 90+% of her body as a gesture, IMO of modesty.
Of course that is a personal choice but it also reflects a more conservative belief of a woman's obligations within society as opposed to those of men.
Whether anyone else believes that what is good for the goose ought to be good for the gander doesn't really matter. But, at least with ZT and KRT neither of their husbands felt the need to wear traditional or conservative attire yet their wives do. It is just curious and especially curious when the woman has either gone the majority of her life wearing modern popular styles and either converts or becomes more committed to the beliefs.
It is just an observation.
On a personal note: I live in one of the most diverse urban areas of the country. In this US city, Anglo-Saxon/European decent citizens are the minority and even here, in this major metropolitan area, the full body coverings are still the minority. Just saying, KRT's belief's were more conservative.
MO, this whole conversation has been blown out of proportion. She can believe and dress any way she wants to...that is her choice. Personally, I don't give a rat's a## how she dresses. I am more concerned as to whether her views on jihad are leaning toward her husband's extremism.
