I really like The Editor responding to comments under that article.
well spotted jelly
"Editor Comment:
Your opinion has no value, Tim, unless you have evidence to support it. That's the whole point. You make dramatic claims, without evidence . . . precisely the point you seem to be complaining about. Conclusion: Unless you are a witness, somebody who was there at the time, your opinion has no value. Witnesses should feel free to speak. Opinionated readers? No thanks. Stop impeding justice."
So the editor by default is making a strong argument for identifying who the 2nd man in the cctv footage of the suspect running is then wouldn't he? This as yet unidentified person has "value." Why has no investigative journalist picked up on this?
here's the video -look in extreme left hand of screen as suspect returns from right hand side of frame.A shadow of this 2nd unidentified person can clearly be seen also. This person needs to be identified or the fact they have been discounted needs to be explained:
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=709748742436187&set=vb.596740650403664&type=2&theater
To me, it looks like the 2nd person has a bag on their back.If it's just an innocent backpacker, they still need to be identified. If they don't know who it is.They at least need to show interest and will in finding out. Who else was at or adjacent to the crime scene??
It has just crossed my mind that the unidentified figure in this clip with what looks like a bag on their back could be another perp on his way, with his belongings, to catch a private speedboat off the island.If another powerful figure was the perp or a co-perp, it's quite likely that burmese would have been made to help organise and streamline an escape. They do not have much if any status, particularly if it were their employer pressurising them.
Locals on koh tao said the son was at ac bar on that night.Police initially stated they were looking for him and said he had left the island early that morning of the 15th which was why he was a primary suspect at first.They later changed their opinion when the sons lawyer produced stills of cctv footage showing son was at uni on the 15th.
I have been researching if it is possible to fake timestamped cctv. It is in fact possible to do so.
CSI LA have put out a call to obtain passenger lists from koh samui to bangkok airport for that morning.
If it was not the son, who was it who left speedily that morning and could be the same unidentified suspect in the video?
I'm aware this could be pie in sky utterly.Purely questioning.Just want the full truth.
Nothing seems too far fetched.
RIP.