Calliope
Former Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2007
- Messages
- 6,534
- Reaction score
- 80
I'm a total loss when it comes to the fineries of the law but if it's true what Kaine says that he was advised by LE to take the baby and get out of dodge while waiting for a RO, wouldn't that go quite some way towards showing he had good cause to remove the child, thus decreasing the similarity between what he did and what Terri might have done if the gym day care worker had called her as requested?
Yes.
I don't believe what Terri did was illegal or violated the RO. First of all, it happened prior to service. Then the word abduct appears in quotes; to me that means that either LE stated that (not likely) or that's the clerk's interpretation of what happened.
IMO, if Terri had truly attempted to "abduct" and that attempt would have been illegal, we wouldn't have seen that relegated to a position of almost an afterthought in the court filing. I think it would have been a bit more urgent and important a matter than Terri showing the RO to Cook.
Additionally, I don't see where the judge even mentioned the alleged "abduction" attempt in his order, which tells me it's completely irrelevant. I wonder if the attorney was admonished off the record for including that as being inflammatory, as she was well aware it occurred prior to the RO.