Jane as you long as you credit what are posting, it's ok to post a paragraph or 2. That's what I try do to do, then add the link if someone wants to read more. That way people can answer your question right away if they know it Thank youG.I.RattlesnakeJane said:
Oh..it is just a chart listing all the evidence that they think is wrong or needs to be retested....saying that the state labeled blood on the back of her nightshirt as cast off blood..but in reality might have been some of her own blood and that it wasn't necessary what the state had labeled. You know..the same old bs. I looked a long time for that little bit of nothing!beesy said:
The site says knives, fists, hachets are medium velocity not low velocity. If you have been using the math formula they stated then you need to change your calculations.beesy said:
beesy said:
This is the site beesy posted. Did I post another one? Beesy's brain all fried up right now.G.I.RattlesnakeJane said:
Give me a chance to catch up with you. This past week on here has been a bit frustrating. So I'll have to read it again. Everytime you asked any blood Q I thought you were saying it was from Darlie's site or the first site I posted. The officer training site. I'm sorry spooky that they use a little bloody hand to show transfer, isn't it?He did not testify. The defense did not choose to let him continue with his tests and therefore he was not called to testify. It is only in the appellate process that they took his affidavit, but it doesn't carry much weight because he didn't complete any tests to make any statements about. All he can say is that he recommends tests be made.deandaniellws said:
Yeah, I know. But it was the closest thing I could find relating to the cast off blood being something else besides cast off blood. Does that make sense? There was a question about the dropplets of blood being aspirations rather than cast off blood.Goody said:
Well, droplets flying off of a bat or board repeatedly hitting someone would fly a lot faster than those off of a knife repeatedly stabbing someone.G.I.RattlesnakeJane said:
There may be some differences of opinon on velocity by the experts but overall common sense will tell you that, regardless of the term they use, blood can fly off of a knife as it is being raised and lowered. And until some expert is willing to step forward and say that those droplets could be something else and then back that opinion up with a test we can see and results that are impressive, the droplets in question will continue to be cast off to us. Just saying something could happen is not enough to discredit Bevel's findings.G.I.RattlesnakeJane said:
I did and it says knives are medium velocity 25 fps .beesy said:
deandaniellws said:
It makes sense to me that the pattern of blood would leave a hole but several splatters would be around this void. I think that is what Dr Lee meant. I can't even blow smoke rings and I don't think my lungs can do it with blood. I think you have Dr. Lee's explanation confused. A pattern circular in nature, would mean several droplets of blood forming a circular pattern, leaving an empty space like a donut in the middle of the pattern, not each drop of blood. Remember that site it says blood STAYS in droplets and hits the surface. The surface also helps to detrmine the pattern. Hard smooth surfaces like glass would leave spikes around the droplet if it was dripping blood. I can't get a good enough view of the blood on the table to see anything but that it runs.Goody said:
No offense but I think you are wrong. I have seen droplets like that. They have a little white patch (if it lands on a white surface) in the middle. They don't have to make a perfect circle but there will be a bloodless center even if it is just a dot. There is no way we can learn what is needed to overrule an expert like Bevel just from reading an internet site. At best we might learn enough to understand his findings. Since we can't eyeball the actual shirt we are even more limited. We might recreate drops similar to those he found and if we can do that we might have something to talk about. But there is no way we are going to prove that his findings are not accurate because his tests show what they show no matter what his conclusions are. So if you want to prove Darlie innocent, you have to show NOT that Bevel is wrong but that there are OTHER ways the blood could land where it did, shaped like it was of similar size. And don't forget those little tails!!!G.I.RattlesnakeJane said:
It is the gory site i think goody posted it but your first site has a link in it at the bottom of the page, to this same site I went to both.beesy said:
Is that your point here she couldn't have stabbed herself. I read dr clayton as well right after DiMaio. He said she lost a lot of blood. Could she have been going into shock on the phone?Goody said:
