- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 16,133
- Reaction score
- 155,208
Maybe they could consider SussexLoyal as a brand.
How about "Sussex Sans Royal"?
"Sussex Ex Royal"?
Maybe they could consider SussexLoyal as a brand.
Or Sussex unloyalMaybe they could consider SussexLoyal as a brand.
CBS this morning just did a report too
Snipped
Camilla's looking well, that dark green really suits her.View attachment 233377 View attachment 233378 View attachment 233379
Duchess of Cornwall looks elegant in her favourite forest green as she joins Prince Charles to present the Queen's Anniversary Prizes at Buckingham Palace
Prince Of Wales and The Duchess Of Cornwall welcome prize winners to Buckingham Palace | Daily Mail Online
Snipped
Boiled down, the message for Harry is: You can't declare that you don't want to be royal – especially in the way that you have done it – and then market yourself as royal.
...
It will affect not just the infamous joint Instagram account, although it also does that. The Queen's move will change every single thing that the couple have trademarked in their once-secret "Megxit laboratory" prior to their sudden announcement of retreat in early January. That will include: clothing (t-shirts, sweaters and the like), books, stationery, china, and what's being described as 'teaching materials.' It's being reported that their nascent foundation, which was, also, planned to carry the Sussex Royal name, will have to bear a different one.
...
wow if this is true - it’s going to mean a new branding right?? Wow
yes or maybe SussexSpoilyal.Maybe they could consider SussexLoyal as a brand.
Knock! Knock!
Who’s there?
Queen?
Queen who?
Queen your room. It’s filthy!
View attachment 233488
What has six legs, four ears and a suit of armor?
– A king on horseback!
___________________
![]()
King Edward Viii, strong resemblance to Zara and Princess Anne.