There will be new news tomorrow once we see the baby and get the nameReally...I've just had to scan read thru 21 pages to catch up, which most of were all posts from yesterday anyways?!
There will be new news tomorrow once we see the baby and get the nameReally...I've just had to scan read thru 21 pages to catch up, which most of were all posts from yesterday anyways?!
True, but they are great with kids. They lick their hands and faces clean, Hoover up under the high chair...no random "Teddy Grahams" about.
Ha ha ha.. or TrevorI think Matthew or James would be appropriate
That whole thing is confusing. If you’re born in Britain to a British and an American they have to report it to America to have a dual citizenship and America isn't well known for dual citizenships. And I’m not sure the royal family would allow that considering Meghan is going to become a UK resident. If they were to split it would make a world full of He!! if the baby is dual citizen I would think.
I have dual citizenship. So does a lot of my family. There are a few countries that say you must renounce citizenship but the US is not one of them
I'm disappointed nobody picked up on thislol
Ha ha ha.. or Trevor![]()
Analysis: Don't use the royal birth to trot out a dangerous myth - CNN
Trust CNN to make a happy occasion of a birth of a new royal baby into a political agenda. This article is beyond offensive.
Its the tone of it. Racism is bad, hmmmmmkay?Why? Interesting discussion .
But that's not really relevant to the baby or the British Royal family thou.Never heard that theory about Phillippa of Hainault before...
The racial hang ups surrounding marriage don't kick in till the Atlantic slave trade takes off because it then becomes very lucrative to pretend that Africans are sub human. The CNN article was right about that, to be fair.
But that's not really relevant to the baby or the British Royal family thou.
For what is worth nobody here in the UK is even discussing (or bothered about) Megan or the babys race, colour or whatever else agenda these kinds of articles have. I don't even think our media is overall? If so I haven't noticed.
* Disclaimer
This is only my personal opinion (based on living in the UK and having a lifetime of day to day interactions with others also living in the UK)
& not necessarily representative as the opinions of the entire population of the UK![]()
Oh I totally agree! I was merely responding to the theory that Phillippa of Hainault was mixed race, sorry for the off topic post.But that's not really relevant to the baby or the British Royal family thou.
For what is worth nobody here in the UK is even discussing (or bothered about) Megan or the babys race, colour or whatever else agenda these kinds of articles have. I don't even think our media is overall? If so I haven't noticed.
* Disclaimer
This is only my personal opinion (based on living in the UK and having a lifetime of day to day interactions with others also living in the UK)
& not necessarily representative as the opinions of the entire population of the UK![]()
I, my sister, and my cousins all learned to walk by pulling ourselves up on the dogs' ears and 'feathers'. I rarely see them now (red setters, not the family!) but always go and say hello even though I'm not such a huge dog lover these days. Give me a daft, lollopy mutt over these new handbag sized yappy dogs, any day of the week!
No no, I wasn't meaning your quote I meant the article trying to make a connection.Oh I totally agree! I was merely responding to the theory that Phillippa of Hainault was mixed race, sorry for the off topic post.
Arthur is also Williams second nameI NEED to see the baby!
Arthur Theodore Spencer
Teddy.
True enough, although I don't know if the OP expected us to go back to the Queens of the 14th century!No no, I wasn't meaning your quote I meant the article trying to make a connection.
ETA. bbm ^ The thread's titled 'The British Royal Family...'![]()
Never heard that theory about Phillippa of Hainault before. It is possible though, the royals and nobles of the 14th century wouldn't have seen anything particularly outrageous about marriage between Europeans and Africans. As long as the African in question was a good Catholic of course!
The racial hang ups surrounding marriage don't kick in till the Atlantic slave trade takes off because it then becomes very lucrative to pretend that Africans are sub human. The CNN article was right about that, to be fair.