• #21
  • #22
I have read they have DNA from victims but none from perpetrator(s). I find it hard to believe there wasn’t any DNA left behind??

What about any new evidence? The family told me about a 2015 police report from the Dardeen’s hometown of Mt. Carmel. It detailed the discovery of some disturbing writing about the case found on the wall of a house, hidden under old wallpaper.

“I tried to talk to the State Police about it,” Joeann said of the strange message on the wall. “Because they’re the ones that come cut it out. And I couldn’t get anything out of him.”

Captain Burge said the wall did not produce any new leads, but remains in evidence.

Keith’s sister Anita Dardeen Knapp added to the list of current questions.

"I just asked her the other day, why haven't they done DNA? Did whoever, did they eat supper with them that night? As long as they were there, surely they opened the refrigerator. There has to be something."

We brought her question to Burge.

“We want to try to do some DNA testing on some items,” he said. “I think we can. But I need to see collectively where it has been before, to where it can go.”
 
  • #23
Have they ever said what was written on the wall?
 
  • #24
Yes, both were. See link in post 7

thanks but post #7 is gone
I'll check out other links

ETA: I found the info - what a terrible case!
 
Last edited:
  • #25
The information about writing on a wall in a house in Mount Carmel is interesting. Supposedly the writing referred to the Dardeen Murders. In the article mentioned above HEARTLAND UNSOLVED:NEVER FORGET, Keith's mother says the writing was cut out of the wall by the police, but did not advance the case. I had not heard of this discovery before. I wonder whose house this was found in. Of course that is not mentioned. The article is a good read . It is in two parts. This case is so disturbing , I hope DNA solves it, it's time the Dardeens received justice. It's been far too long. JMO MOO
 
  • #26
Tommy was very sneaky ,going though windows sometimes ,befriending the victims dogs ,his tactics varied wildly and he also was apt to make split second choices on who an why he was murdering people.
Sellers of the House .
If they had a for Sale sign up , Tommy could have seen that as a sign he was supposed to murder this family. And Tommy was very brutal. He murdered a girl because she had a Tommy Hilfiger shirt on. imo. I Think he did murder this family.
Back around 2000 I had thought it might be the serial killer Angel Maturino Reséndiz but they never found anything that tied him to the murders. I never believed it was Sells, too many inconsistencies in all his stories, and so many other killings he claimed were proven he didn't do.

What is the significance of the watermelon ceramics? Were they unique? Some posters elsewhere say watermelon dishes were common in the 1980s. Were the dishes smashed? Since one of his stories is he was asked to the house for dinner (he took that story back), did LE ask what design was on the dinnerware? It has to be in the police report, maybe in a photo. He's talking 13 years after the murders.


2010 article.

Detective Capt. John Kemp of the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office has worked on the Dardeen family murder case since 1987.

Kemp was able to spend hours interviewing Sells after his admission to the crimes. He is almost certain Sells committed the crimes.

"A couple of things he told us were never released to the public, and a couple of things he told us we didn't even know at the time we interviewed him, but we checked on them and found them to be true,"

Kemp said. "I still have questions and would like nothing better than to get him up here, but that is not going to happen because Texas isn't going to turn him loose.

But still, in my mind, he is suspect No. 1."
 
  • #27
Back around 2000 I had thought it might be the serial killer Angel Maturino Reséndiz but they never found anything that tied him to the murders. I never believed it was Sells, too many inconsistencies in all his stories, and so many other killings he claimed were proven he didn't do.

What is the significance of the watermelon ceramics? Were they unique? Some posters elsewhere say watermelon dishes were common in the 1980s. Were the dishes smashed? Since one of his stories is he was asked to the house for dinner (he took that story back), did LE ask what design was on the dinnerware? It has to be in the police report, maybe in a photo. He's talking 13 years after the murders.


2010 article.

Detective Capt. John Kemp of the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office has worked on the Dardeen family murder case since 1987.

Kemp was able to spend hours interviewing Sells after his admission to the crimes. He is almost certain Sells committed the crimes.

"A couple of things he told us were never released to the public, and a couple of things he told us we didn't even know at the time we interviewed him, but we checked on them and found them to be true,"

Kemp said. "I still have questions and would like nothing better than to get him up here, but that is not going to happen because Texas isn't going to turn him loose.

But still, in my mind, he is suspect No. 1."
They were not unique at the time. Everyone and their momma had watermelon ceramic something in their mauve and country blue kitchen with ruffled curtains and a cartoonish duck themed wallpaper border. She probably also kept a basket on the floor of the living room for old magazines, random toys and the TV Guide and had furry covers for the toilet tank and lid.
 
  • #28
This case is one of the most brutal, and cold blooded murder cases, and I want to see it solved badly partially because I want to see the face of the person evil enough to do this.
Some people think that a stranger/serial killer committed this crime, but I don't. I think this was personal, and this person had a true hatred for one or both of the adult victims.

Shame it's not solved due to the likelihood of physical evidence.
I keep expecting to get a Google alert that the case is solved. One of these days hopefully
 
  • #29
@morf13 can you comment on whether the additional details of the mutilations are accurate?

The first paragraph (of two) mentioning the Dardeens’ injuries starts with “Keith Dardeen’s body was found in a field a mile away from the trailer where he and his family called home.”


Just curious, as they seem to be a legit organization (associated with Innocence Project?) but also seem all in on Sells as drug mule/contract hit on Dardeens, which I find ludicrous (of course I don’t know all the facts they do, presumably:)).
 
  • #30
@morf13 can you comment on whether the additional details of the mutilations are accurate?

The first paragraph (of two) mentioning the Dardeens’ injuries starts with “Keith Dardeen’s body was found in a field a mile away from the trailer where he and his family called home.”


Just curious, as they seem to be a legit organization (associated with Innocence Project?) but also seem all in on Sells as drug mule/contract hit on Dardeens, which I find ludicrous (of course I don’t know all the facts they do, presumably:)).
From my recollection, that's correct.
 
  • #31
@morf13 can you comment on whether the additional details of the mutilations are accurate?

The first paragraph (of two) mentioning the Dardeens’ injuries starts with “Keith Dardeen’s body was found in a field a mile away from the trailer where he and his family called home.”


Just curious, as they seem to be a legit organization (associated with Innocence Project?) but also seem all in on Sells as drug mule/contract hit on Dardeens, which I find ludicrous (of course I don’t know all the facts they do, presumably:)).
If this is true, do mules not get paid well?
 
  • #32
thanks but post #7 is gone
I'll check out other links

ETA: I found the info - what a terrible case!
Absolutely one of the worst.
 
  • #33
With each bit of research I have done on the case the more convinced I am the answers lie in Keith’s past. He was scared for some reason and wouldn’t say why. I suspect Keith Dardeen had major skeletons in his closet and those skeletons, those secrets, finally caught up and he and his family paid with their lives. Look at the mutilation of his body as a key, the way his genitalia was mutilated and positioned. That doesn’t feel like something a serial killer with no personal connection to their victims would do but rather what someone who knows the dark secrets of a person would do. I think his mother knows more than she has let on. Her wording is one of the keys to finding who killed this family. Something occurred in the past involving Keith, probably something covered up or buried, but it got out in the end. I have been saying this on comment sections for YouTube videos covering this case but I have never been convinced it was Sells. The mutilation feels a bit too personal in nature and that message might be a clue to the true motive behind the deaths. We need access to the contents of that message.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Why does the article not mention what the murderer did to the newborn baby that was born in the middle of this attack? That is one of many reason I believe Tommy Sells to have done this crime. Texas refused to let him leave the state after his death row convictions which lead to a lot of cases being left unanswered.

A Couple and Their 2-Year-Old Son Were Brutally Murdered — More Than 30 Years Later, The Case Is Still Unsolved
I know this is an old post, but chances are, they have left that unpublished because it's one of those things that "only the perpetrator would know."
 
  • #35
With each bit of research I have done on the case the more convinced I am the answers lie in Keith’s past. He was scared for some reason and wouldn’t say why. I suspect Keith Dardeen had major skeletons in his closet and those skeletons, those secrets, finally caught up and he and his family paid with their lives. Look at the mutilation of his body as a key, the way his genitalia was mutilated and positioned. That doesn’t feel like something a serial killer with no personal connection to their victims would do but rather what someone who knows the dark secrets of a person would do. I think his mother knows more than she has let on. Her wording is one of the keys to finding who killed this family. Something occurred in the past involving Keith, probably something covered up or buried, but it got out in the end. I have been saying this on comment sections for YouTube videos covering this case but I have never been convinced it was Sells. The mutilation feels a bit too personal in nature and that message might be a clue to the true motive behind the deaths. We need access to the contents of that message.
Could you kindly provide the details as to what Keith's mom said?
 
  • #36
Could you kindly provide the details as to what Keith's mom said?
What she said:
“I think someone wanted Keith to sell drugs and he refused.” Also “Or there's a possibility someone liked Elaine and she wouldn't accept his advances and he took out his rage on both of them ... We just don't know.” I suspect what she omitted, her other suspicions, might be a key to finding the motive. Like I said this felt too personal in nature to be the work of a random person. I think Keith did something as a teen/young adult and it came back to bite him, hard, with his family paying the price as well for his actions. Now what that could be I don’t want to say anything as it is just speculative but I imagine something sexual in nature based on the mutilation of his genitalia.
 
  • #37
I hate this case. it's one of the ones I wish I'd never heard of.

the possibility that it's someone's from keith's past is interesting. but if it were revenge for something, does that type of murderer typically kill the wife and children too??

for some reason I find it easier to imagine a pure sadist who just liked brutally murdering.
 
  • #38
I hate this case. it's one of the ones I wish I'd never heard of.

the possibility that it's someone's from keith's past is interesting. but if it were revenge for something, does that type of murderer typically kill the wife and children too??

for some reason I find it easier to imagine a pure sadist who just liked brutally murdering.
Well if they saw him living the “good life” after getting away with what I suspect he possibly did then yes. Also if they view the entire family as “tainted”.
 
  • #39
What she said:
“I think someone wanted Keith to sell drugs and he refused.” Also “Or there's a possibility someone liked Elaine and she wouldn't accept his advances and he took out his rage on both of them ... We just don't know.” I suspect what she omitted, her other suspicions, might be a key to finding the motive. Like I said this felt too personal in nature to be the work of a random person. I think Keith did something as a teen/young adult and it came back to bite him, hard, with his family paying the price as well for his actions. Now what that could be I don’t want to say anything as it is just speculative but I imagine something sexual in nature based on the mutilation of his genitalia.
Please, provide a link to this.
 
  • #40
Hello websleuths and Happy Easter. I am a new user here and this has been my pet case for a number of years and I have many (conflicting) thoughts and theories as to what may have happened that night the Dardeens were murdered. In my opinion, the murderer is almost certainly not Sells for many reasons, some of which I will not get into right now.

I have seen a number of rumors and theories online from other Dardeen "researchers" that there was a woman at Keith's church who was unhealthily infatuated with him, possibly named Susan. Keith repeatedly spurned her advances and propositions. This Susan had a mentally-ill brother with a bad temper named Paul who was a helper at the church. It is said that after it was announced in the church that Elaine was expecting, this Susan, infuriated, began to plot the murder with her brother, essentially manipulating him into carrying it through. She had allegedly told Paul that Keith had attempted to rape her, that Elaine had been making fun of him, and that the Dardeens were attempting to kick him out of the church. A part of me wonders whether or not the mysterious young woman who came to the Dardeen trailer to ask to use the phone and was refused entry by Keith could have been this Susan. Supposedly Susan is still alive and Paul has deceased, but I cannot trace this rumor back to the person who first originally said it, and of course, I have yet to confirm whether the two were actually real.

(According to people on Facebook who were in his congregation, after moving to Ina, Keith and Elaine went to Spring Garden Community Church which was somewhere in Spring Garden Township, which contains Ina, the town of Bonnie to the north, and surrounding unincorporated small settlements. The church and the building have not existed since at least the early 2000s and I have been unable to find any more information about this church, let alone what its address might have been. At some point I would like to corroborate with people who were in that congregation whether or not Susan or Paul were real people.)

Whether or not the Susan and Paul story is online hearsay, I 100% believe the murder had to have been done by someone from the area who had known Keith and Elaine since their move to Ina, whether or not either of them had any meaningful interactions with the murderer(s). The brutality and bizarre staging of the entire crime make no sense for a professional hit or a case of mistaken identity. If the killer was a drifting SK using the railroads to move around (like Sells) it doesn't make sense why they wouldn't have parked the car closer to the railway in Benton.

Given that Keith and Elaine were only in Ina for about a year this would narrow it down to someone from the church, someone from Keith or Elaine's work, or someone who had enough information on and rapport with the Dardeens to know where they lived and what their schedule was. If the killer was "let in" then this may be the most likely reason, especially if it's someone from the same church who Keith might have implicitly trusted more than others. Though I think it is just as likely that the killer got a hold of the keys to the trailer - the house keys could have been on the same keyring as the car keys.

The staging of Keith's murder also makes me imagine it's a local. Keith was scheduled to work at 11 that Tuesday and it is likely he might have picked up his killer or was "intercepted" on his way there while making his way down I-37. A quick map I made of the primary locations involved. His body was positioned only several feet away from the Jefferson-Franklin county border, which the perp(s) might have known would complicate investigative efforts. Keith's body was also dumped about 1000 feet away from the property of Rend Lake College, just off to the side of one of the main roads leading there, meaning whoever killed Keith and mutilated him might have wanted his body to be discovered.

While I understand a rural midwestern county might not have much in the way of funding investigations into complex cold cases, the lack of interest the Jefferson County Sheriffs Dept has taken with this case in recent decades upsets me, especially with the many revolutions that have taken place in forensic technology since the late 1980s. Even something as simple as correcting the facts and being open with the information on this case (within reason) has yet to be done. As many other cold case murders are being solved due to DNA it boggles me that a crime like this, with different crime scenes spanning miles, has absolutely zero DNA from the killer(s). I would be very surprised if more than just a handful of crime scene items have been even run through CODIS.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
121
Guests online
1,953
Total visitors
2,074

Forum statistics

Threads
646,155
Messages
18,855,029
Members
245,920
Latest member
Onewayoflife
Top