icedtea4me
Given the nature of your psychological interests, I am curious what you make of PR claiming that she thought at first that the RN was referring to an older daughter of JR. (Elizabeth?)
Any theory that Patsy or Burke killed JB by (accidentally or on purpose) hitting her on the head are not medically sound. The little girl was already dead when she was struck on the head, which is why there was almost zero internal bleeding.<snip>
Are you just clarifying the issue? Because I do not believe JB died because Patsy or Burke accidentally hit her on the head. I consider this to be a premeditated murder.Upon reflection of the scalp there is found to be an extensive area of scalp hemorrhage along the right temporoparietal area extending from the orbital ridge, posteriorly all the way to the occipital area. This encompasses an area measuring approximately 7 x 4 inches. This grossly appears to be fresh hemorrhage with no evidence of organization.
http://www.acandyrose.com/12271996jonbenet07.gif
If she had been struck on the head after blood flow to the brain had ceased, there would be no area of extensive scalp hemorrhage.
Are you just clarifying the issue? Because I do not believe JB died because Patsy or Burke accidentally hit her on the head. I consider this to be a premeditated murder.
It's also interesting that only Patsy's paintbrush was used to strangle JB. Pasty does appear to have been framed. Look at the ransom note, notepad and writing paper.
This is largely why I suspect John and John Andrew. Plus I know the contents of the suitcase.
No one cover ups an accidental death by staging a "sexual crime." The family could claim that the little girl fell and hit her head.
And it's worth noting that Patsy innocently called the police, before John could dispose of the suitcase and the dead body.
Firstly, we must understand that this was a premeditated murder. There seems to be two motives. 1) to silence JB so that she cannot report PRIOR sexual abuse; and 2) to frame or at least cast suspicion on Patsy.
A routine "sexual predator" would be more interested in framing the father, than in framing the mother.
Secondly, we must understand that JB that the Patsy theory and the Burke theory are not medically sound. Most likely, the little girl was already dead when she received the head injury, since thee was almost zero internal bleeding.
Thirdly, had Patsy or Burke killed JB by accident by striking her on the head, the family could claim that the little girl fell and hit her head.
Fourth, as a woman, I do not want to give John or John Andrew a few pass (as least one of these men is a sexual abuser), and blame Patsy or Burke. I also consider the Patsy theory to be biased and sexist.
So, who has these two motives? John and John Andrew!
If JonBenet is already dead what is the motivation for whacking her on the head which leaves no visible sign of injury?Secondly, we must understand that JB that the Patsy theory and the Burke theory are not medically sound. Most likely, the little girl was already dead when she received the head injury, since thee was almost zero internal bleeding.
PremeditatedCrime,
If JonBenet is already dead what is the motivation for whacking her on the head which leaves no visible sign of injury?
Patsy's fibers are embedded into the knotting of the paintbrush/ligature device, what's sexist about that evidence?
John Andrew has a cast iron alibi corroborated by folks in another state, so he is not a suspect.
Whereas John Ramsey is, likely along with Patsy, a prime suspect.
So on the face of it, looks like Patsy helped stage the crime-scene along with John Ramsey, even the Grand Jury think this, so much so, they leveled COUNT VII (Accessory to a Crime) at them both.
.
I don't think this was addressed to me but I will comment:icedtea4me
Given the nature of your psychological interests, I am curious what you make of PR claiming that she thought at first that the RN was referring to an older daughter of JR. (Elizabeth?)
Re: Grand Jury
If I am correct, the Grand Jury suspected long standing sexual abuse, running in both the John's family, and also in Patsy's family. Their parents, grandparents and such.
Was Burke interviewed and asked if he had ever been sexually abused?
Re: Sexism
Yes, but look at the two police detectives (Thomas and the other one).
One said that Burke did it, and that only Patsy covered it up. Why not John also covering it up?
The other detective stated that Pasty lost it over a bedwetting accident, and went into a rage. Yet, it was John was known to be a vey strict and disciplinary father, who was known to have rages. He used to yell at Patsy about all sorts of things. Why only Patsy blamed?
Besides John was physically stronger than Patsy. Why hasn't anyone considered that John flew into a rage, and that John bashed JB's head, and then covered it up as an accident.
Besides, if Patsy or Burke had (accidentally) struck JB, the best thing to do would be to take her to the hospital, claiming that the girl had fallen, perhaps in the bathroom. Accidents do happen, and they could pretend that she fell against the bathtub.
Sure, but only if you are correct. No details on this subject has been revealed by the GJ.If I am correct, the Grand Jury suspected long standing sexual abuse, running in both the John's family, and also in Patsy's family. Their parents, grandparents and such.
Interviewed yes, on that question, who knows?Was Burke interviewed and asked if he had ever been sexually abused?
Your focus on sexism is biasing you to ignore the evidence which directly implicates Patsy!One said that Burke did it, and that only Patsy covered it up. Why not John also covering it up?
The other detective stated that Pasty lost it over a bedwetting accident, and went into a rage. Yet, it was John was known to be a vey strict and disciplinary father, who was known to have rages. He used to yell at Patsy about all sorts of things. Why only Patsy blamed?
Sure, why not, except the evidence does not support this theory.Besides John was physically stronger than Patsy. Why hasn't anyone considered that John flew into a rage, and that John bashed JB's head, and then covered it up as an accident.
Which is why it was probably not an accident. Then there is the sexual assault, how does that get explained away at the hospital?Besides, if Patsy or Burke had (accidentally) struck JB, the best thing to do would be to take her to the hospital, claiming that the girl had fallen, perhaps in the bathroom. Accidents do happen, and they could pretend that she fell against the bathtub.
There is another good read about Patsy's psyche entitled "A Mother Gone Bad" written by Andrew Hodges. Fast, fascinating read. Can't put down. Hodges' credentials in bio are fascinating, too.
View attachment 287249 View attachment 287251
<snip>I also watched movie and read the book "The Prime of Miss Jean Brody" that PR recited a portion of as her talent performance in the 1980 Miss Virginia contest.
Few questions:
1. Did JB die at the Whites? Were the Whites, Fernies, and Ramseys all involved in the cover-up?
2. The handwriting seems to match a certain penmanship that Fleet White learned years ago. (This would not be Fleet White's usual handwriting style.)
3. Did John compose the CONTENTS of the note, though he may not have handwritten the note? There's no profanity (swear words) in the note, which is why I suspect John of composing the letter. And, the letter is sort of a "big ego trip."
4. Why was Patsy framed? Sexism? Maybe they were trying to make it look like an old boyfriend of hers was trying to frame her?
5. I've read reports of Patsy having a boyfriend, plus a couple of former boyfriends. But they checked out fine; nothing suspicious. They co-operated with the police. No evidence that they were "sexual abusers" or that they wanted revenge against Patsy.
6. Could John have gotten the body out of the house without the neighbors seeing? I cannot see the body fitting into a suitcase, but I honestly don't know.
Patsy would not have the physical strength to get the body out of the house.
7. John's business had dubious connections and dealings (, perhaps money laundering). I do not rule out the pedophile/
/prostitution angle, but why only frame Patsy?
8. Could be a coincidence that Patsy was framed? It would be more likely that they were trying to pretend that an old boyfriend of hers wanted revenge.
9. I believe the reports that Elizabeth did accuse John of sexual abuse. A few weeks or a few months later, she wound up dead in a "car accident." Since this was fully investigated, can we assume that it was truly an accident?
10. I know about Nancy Krebs. Even if some of her details were exaggerated, it doesn't mean that Fleet/White were not involved in the sexual abuse.
By the way, I'm a Liberal and not religious. I'm anti-, anti-prostitution, and anti-sexual exploitation - but not convinced that
/prostitution was involved. I'm in Canada.
No because she snacked pineapple after leaving the White's, her large intestine does not lie.1. Did JB die at the Whites? Were the Whites, Fernies, and Ramseys all involved in the cover-up?
Patsy's script will differ from Fleet's in predictable features, from memory both scripts have been named in books highlighting this subject.2. The handwriting seems to match a certain penmanship that Fleet White learned years ago. (This would not be Fleet White's usual handwriting style.)
John quite likely assisted Patsy, revising drafts and proof-reading it.3. Did John compose the CONTENTS of the note, though he may not have handwritten the note? There's no profanity (swear words) in the note, which is why I suspect John of composing the letter. And, the letter is sort of a "big ego trip."
Only John could frame her and what would his motive be, sexism is definitely off the menu.4. Why was Patsy framed? Sexism? Maybe they were trying to make it look like an old boyfriend of hers was trying to frame her?
I've seen no official reports on this matter.5. I've read reports of Patsy having a boyfriend, plus a couple of former boyfriends. But they checked out fine; nothing suspicious. They co-operated with the police. No evidence that they were "sexual abusers" or that they wanted revenge against Patsy.
Patsy would have no problem carrying JonBenet out of the house, she was only 6-years old.6. Could John have gotten the body out of the house without the neighbors seeing? I cannot see the body fitting into a suitcase, but I honestly don't know. Patsy would not have the physical strength to get the body out of the house.
The Grand Jury think that both John and Patsy were involved in JonBenet's homicide both were hit with COUNT VII (Accessory to a Crime) and COUNT IV (child abuse resulting in death).7. John's business had dubious connections and dealings (, perhaps money laundering). I do not rule out the pedophile/
/prostitution angle, but why only frame Patsy?
Christmas night in a remote basement wine-cellar seems disconnected from any prior boyfriend, i.e. no forensic evidence.8. Could be a coincidence that Patsy was framed? It would be more likely that they were trying to pretend that an old boyfriend of hers wanted revenge.
No such reports were ever made public. You can assume it was an accident, which for the purposes of investigating JonBenet's homicide has no relevant link.9. I believe the reports that Elizabeth did accuse John of sexual abuse. A few weeks or a few months later, she wound up dead in a "car accident." Since this was fully investigated, can we assume that it was truly an accident?
Its just Fake News published to trash Fleet White's credibility. Also it's old, old and passe.10. I know about Nancy Krebs. Even if some of her details were exaggerated, it doesn't mean that Fleet/White were not involved in the sexual abuse.
Any criminal activity linked with JonBenet's death will be constrained to her immediate family as there is zero forensic evidence relating to anyone outside of her house!By the way, I'm a Liberal and not religious. I'm anti-, anti-prostitution, and anti-sexual exploitation - but not convinced that
/prostitution was involved. I'm in Canada.
4. There was a "Oh, The Places You Will Go" Dr Seuss book and a semen-stained duvet in the suitcase.
Is the title of the Dr. Seuss book, sourced only to JAR's twitter,
a definite?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.