The "Everything Michael Jackson" Thread

  • #301
kgeaux said:
I think the nydailynews is a tabloid type of paper. They go for the sensational and haven't been above exaggeration and maybe flat out making stuff up.

They got some things right in the runaway bride case, but sometimes they are really off the wall.

A grain of salt may be called for here!
The Daily News is tabloid in format, as all but the NYT are in that area, due to the fact most people read them on the subway on the way to work, but not reputation.
 
  • #302
deandaniellws said:
But that means since they are not his kids..he feels free to molest them all he wants. :mad:
And he designed them to be the physical types he prefers (except Paris, which was clearly a mistake).
 
  • #303
BillyGoatGruff said:
And he designed them to be the physical types he prefers (except Paris, which was clearly a mistake).
LOL...guess so. :crazy:
 
  • #304
Wolfwood said:
It wasn't even the RIGHT woman! They attacked someone who had nothing to do with Joe! They had to pay her off so she doesn't take them to court.
Hey, Ma Barker was a Christian woman!
 
  • #305
deandaniellws said:
Lol...what trash!:doh:
Did you hear that the drummer for the Jackson Five was recently murdered in Gary, Indiana?
 
  • #306
Goody said:
Did you hear that the drummer for the Jackson Five was recently murdered in Gary, Indiana?
Maybe he knew something and Ma Barker-Jackson had to knock him off! LOL :D
 
  • #307
I always thought those kids were michael's real kids-that maybe they just did an invitro or something with his sperm. You'd think he's want to pass on his singing genes if it was genetically possible. Why not use his own sperm?
 
  • #308
ellen13 said:
I always thought those kids were michael's real kids-that maybe they just did an invitro or something with his sperm. You'd think he's want to pass on his singing genes if it was genetically possible. Why not use his own sperm?

IMO, because he doesn't want his kids to look like himself, or any of the Jackson's. Not that the Jackson's look like their old selves anyway, but that's my guess. MJ is full of self-loathing, it doesn't take a rocket surgeon to see that's why he has mutilated his face.

Yes, I know there is no such thing as a "rocket surgeon", it's my little combination of rocket scientist and brain surgeon.
 
  • #309
ellen13 said:
I always thought those kids were michael's real kids-that maybe they just did an invitro or something with his sperm. You'd think he's want to pass on his singing genes if it was genetically possible. Why not use his own sperm?

Probably because he would feel more comfortable molesting them if they were not biologically his, maybe?!!
 
  • #310
lizziedripping said:
Err, is it true that Michael and Janet Jackson are actually the same person - has anyone ever seen them together?????? LOL :doh:
OK. I almost fell off my chair laughing! That was a good one.:clap:
 
  • #311
OmG This entire thread has made me sick to my tummy. These are a messed up bunch of people!
 
  • #312
solidarity said:
Probably because he would feel more comfortable molesting them if they were not biologically his, maybe?!!
That is why he wanted them. Interesting that he wanted to be white so bad that he bleached himself and made sure his bought children were white also.
 
  • #313
OneLostGrl said:
OmG This entire thread has made me sick to my tummy. These are a messed up bunch of people!
What makes it so sick is this guy has been allowed to prey on children due to wealth and fame.
Debbie Row, who had his children, testified how good he was. His family stands by him and when the trial is over decide to tell all. He has been allowed to be a sicko and his family is sick for going along with it.
 
  • #314
  • #315
Jermaine is full of crap, imo.! It will be interesting to see if he sues anyone--I bet he doesn't because it would all come back to bite him in the rear, I think.

shopper, thanks for posting tonight's LKL transcript.
 
  • #316
  • #317
  • #318
Goody said:
Hey, Ma Barker was a Christian woman!
And she didn't pretend she was something other than what she was.
 
  • #319
ellen13 said:
I always thought those kids were michael's real kids-that maybe they just did an invitro or something with his sperm. You'd think he's want to pass on his singing genes if it was genetically possible. Why not use his own sperm?

My guess is because he's only "in love" with the perfect BLONDE blue eyed humans..... (the little ones) and his genes would interfere tremendously. Also, my hunch is his little girl gets 0 attention. Prince I & II probably get daddys attention. He doesn't like little girls.
 
  • #320
IMO...this whole family needs major, major help and I'm not even sure that this world has the kind of help they need!
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
2,254
Total visitors
2,388

Forum statistics

Threads
632,497
Messages
18,627,626
Members
243,171
Latest member
neckdeepinstories
Back
Top