The Great New Spin

  • #21
Show Me said:
The RST has the best 'spin' of all. Look at allllllll the suspects, John, Patsy and their team has named or suggested thru innuendos. Not only thru news media, but also on various tv shows and in their own book!

Hey the RST 'suspects' all didn't kill JonBenet, so what the RST is promoting is slanderous to the innocent victims.

Funny how many RST suspects took polygraphs for the LE...while the Ramseys (although promising publicly they would, even 10 of them)...never did.

Funny also how the Ramseys were the ONLY ones to retain attorneys and yet nobody else is in jail and the Ramseys remain the only suspects

Only the Ramseys, as per the RST are excused by the DNA, but nobody else is. They still toss around names of people whose DNA also doesn't match, but only the Ramseys get a pass I guess.

Actually, it's not so funny.

RST idiocy!
 
  • #22
Barbara said:
So then there is no reason to believe Beckner or the other members of the BPD when they state that Burke didn't do it, the Ramseys DNA don't match, and other Ramsey innocence statements?

The BPD, including Beckner also have stated various things that are exculpatory to the Ramseys.

So which is it?

Very selective Maikai, the RST quotes Steve Thomas when it is kind to the Ramseys, they quote various police statements when it is favorable to the Ramseys, but then other times, we have quotes like the above from Tracey and Maikai.

Which is it?

Which statements should we believe and which ones are outright lies .

Are you stating that Beckner outright lied about the bootprints not matching Helgoth?????????? Are you saying they made it up?

Bumping in case Maikai or anyone else would like to clarify exactly which statements from the BPD are correct and which ones are lies?

We should make a list so that we are all not theorizing about BPD results that are lies, Thomas' statements that are false and all the other "evidence" that is seemingly just made up and inaccurate.

I would like to add that if the BPD results are inaccurate, might the results that seem to "clear" the Ramseys also be inaccurate? Perhaps further testing of Ramsey prints and DNA are in order.

It would be nice to get an answer
 
  • #23
My niece visited us today. She's studying Forensic Science at University and he was bursting to talk about the documentary which she'd seen last week. It was the first conversation I'd had about it (excluding my Mother who is staying with us just now).

My niece hasn't followed the case, but she is fascintated and wants to watch the other two documentaries and to read the books. I'd prefer she did that before we have any kind of real discussion.

We were a bit miserable today because the weekend sailing was cancelled due to the most appalllingly eather we've been having. However, my niece's visit was fun and she's invited me for a tour of the Forensice Science Unit next week. I'm going to meet some Professor so I'm going to have to think of some questions to ask him. Think I might ask about the DNA actually Woohoo!
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
120
Guests online
2,179
Total visitors
2,299

Forum statistics

Threads
632,615
Messages
18,629,099
Members
243,216
Latest member
zagadka
Back
Top