- Joined
- Jan 7, 2005
- Messages
- 7,203
- Reaction score
- 170
misterallgood said:I smell a bigger plan here;
- The alleged embezzling; setting the money aside. There is nothing in the news to indicate the money supposedly embezzled has been recovered.
misterallgood said:I smell a bigger plan here;
- The alleged embezzling; setting the money aside. There is nothing in the news to indicate the money supposedly embezzled has been recovered.
You'd be right about that... but who is to say Raven was done, if he is guilty of the embezzling? He might have gotten snagged only mid-way through his plan. And Scott Peterson had only a thousand dollars more in cash on him when he was caught near the Mexican border.JerseyGirl said:[/list]Didn't Raven only embezzle $9,000? Your theory seems possible but if the figure was only $9,000, I can't imagine him getting far with that money. I could be remembering incorrectly as I'm beginning to go cross-eyed from reading here most of the day!
Do you mean in reference to Raven & Janet's situation? I ask because my children have my last name in use and on their birth certificates.Thinkoflaura said:It's also US law when a baby is born to a married couple for the baby to have the father's last name, as I understand it, and he was born in the US.
Very odd. Parts of this sound familiar and parts sound very unfamiliar. I remember that during the trial he said that he had returned home to find that his wife had murdered two of their children, and that their youngest was still alive but barely. He said that he "finished the job" on the baby to put her out of her misery, and killed his wife out of anger for what she did to their children, (but I don't remember what order the murders to which he confessed occurred). Even after what he did, he blamed his wife for the murders.PrayersForMaura said:Name is Longo I believe:
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/archives/00001549.html
"On Dec. 27, the bodies of MaryJane, 34, and 2-year-old Madison were found stuffed in suitcases in Yaquina Bay. Their bodies were recovered just yards from a second-floor balcony in an upscale condominium where Longo stood in a biting coastal drizzle and admired the "perfect setting" late on the night of Dec. 16.
"
Yes, this is definitely him. I forgot about this part:misterallgood said:Here's an article about Longo ...
WOW! That's a good point!golfmom said:IF the computer disappeared between Janet's murder and the search warrant that could cause some pretty serious problems.
We know that the computer was in the house on the 25th;
Janet was murdered the 26th;
the search was conducted the 27th.
So in his deep grief, Raven did what with his computer ? ? ?
True but if he got snagged mid-way through, wouldn't he realize that he'd have to put the rest of the plan on the back burner until he had more than $9,000?misterallgood said:You'd be right about that... but who is to say Raven was done, if he is guilty of the embezzling? He might have gotten snagged only mid-way through his plan.
I mentioned that thought too in an earlier post. He mentions in his ramblings that the company tightened the expense budget, and miraculously, he was the only one to keep it in line. This is probably because he knew the game was up and he'd probably be under close scrutiny. As I mentioned earlier, padding the expense reports is definitely a form of embezzlement. If you notice the dates on the indictment, he's charged with embezzling on the 1st of the month for 4-5 months in a row, on the same date. In many companies, expense reports are due at the end of the month, i.e. the 1st of the following month.golfmom said:Raven was a salesman, so what opportunity would he have to embezzle?
My thought is that he was padding his expense reports to the tune of $1,500 a month with fake receipts.
What do ya'll think?
Yes, if he was non-psychopathic and practical and rational.JerseyGirl said:True but if he got snagged mid-way through, wouldn't he realize that he'd have to put the rest of the plan on the back burner until he had more than $9,000?
To continue on this thought, I highly doubt that he squirreled the money away, at least long term. He had been wanting that motorcycle for some time and probably used the money towards that, or one of his other toys. I really can't imagine a motive here, however. His wife was a saint.NCBanker said:I mentioned that thought too in an earlier post. He mentions in his ramblings that the company tightened the expense budget, and miraculously, he was the only one to keep it in line. This is probably because he knew the game was up and he'd probably be under close scrutiny. As I mentioned earlier, padding the expense reports is definitely a form of embezzlement. If you notice the dates on the indictment, he's charged with embezzling on the 1st of the month for 4-5 months in a row, on the same date. In many companies, expense reports are due at the end of the month, i.e. the 1st of the following month.
Great minds think alike!
Very good post, misterallgood. Your points are well-taken.misterallgood said:That you would offer a rational argument speaks well of you, though, JerseyGirl -- and I'm totally serious. What it says to me is that you aren't able to really put yourself in the head of someone capable of these kinds of acts. I wish I couldn't, but it comes with a certain upbringing, exposure to certain personality types, being related to them by blood.
No, he didn't graduate from any kind of college. I don't know about HS, or whether he took a GED test. He had 1 year at a Jr. College, and 1 yr. at the college Janet went to. It's part of his archived " IT experience" resume".PrayersForMaura said:True he probably has his own, he just doesn't strike me as very smart. Especially in the email I saw that he wrote to a client of his... He's a wannabe smart one but it seems Janet graduated with some honors and I wonder if he graduated at all??
Thinkoflaura said:No, he didn't graduate from any kind of college. I don't know about HS, or whether he took a GED test. He had 1 year at a Jr. College, and 1 yr. at the college Janet went to. It's part of his archived " IT experience" resume".
Yes, I've been going back and adding everything offically said or known up and checking it against Raven's archived entries today.. Interesting.golfmom said:One thing I found odd in the press release from the college it mentioned that Janet took a year off from school to spend with Raven. Usually, once people leave school like that it takes a long time for them to get back to school (if they ever do). I think it says a lot about Janet that she returned to finish her education.