The Smiths

Status
Not open for further replies.
In her FB message Tammi Smith said on 1-27-2010 @ 1:53 pm
Paraphrased...about LE searching the landfills

Tammi says it shouldn't matter whan anyone thought, LE should have started searching after that text. (from Elizabeth to Logan stating she killed Gabriel.)
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php...#/photo.php?pid=643231&id=1585061919&comments

This was after saying from the beginning they believed Gabriel was alive and in fact had heard him crying while on the phone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Smiths told CBS5 they are confident little Gabriel is alive. They were in contact with Elizabeth Johnson up until she was arrested, and they could hear Gabriel through the phone in the background.

"I heard the baby babble... I heard the baby cry, " Smith said.
http://www.kpho.com/news/22125969/detail.html
 
In her FB message Tammi Smith said on 1-27-2010 @ 1:53 pm
Paraphrased...about LE searching the landfills

Tammi says it shouldn't matter whan anyone thought, LE should have started searching after that text. (from Elizabeth to Logan stating she killed Gabriel.)
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php...#/photo.php?pid=643231&id=1585061919&comments

This was after saying from the beginning they believed Gabriel was alive and in fact had heard him crying while on the phone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Smiths told CBS5 they are confident little Gabriel is alive. They were in contact with Elizabeth Johnson up until she was arrested, and they could hear Gabriel through the phone in the background.

"I heard the baby babble... I heard the baby cry, " Smith said.
http://www.kpho.com/news/22125969/detail.html

More related inconsistencies:

Whereas Tammi says she heard Gabe babbling, she also says Eliz wouldn't talk on the phone with her Dec 27, so either she didn't hear Gabe babbling, or she did talk with Eliz on the phone:

TAMMI SMITH: Sunday the 27th. And that was the day that she would not communicate with me by verbal. She only communicated by texting and telling me that she was out of range because she was driving.
 
Such a great pick up BeanE. She can't have it both ways.
 
Post respectfully snipped

"Immediately after she sent him the text that said she killed the baby, she sent us a text saying that she did that to get back at the father and that the baby was fine," said Jack Smith.

http://www.kpho.com/news/22125969/detail.html

Doesn't Jack know that LE can retrieve those text messages? People think that deleting them from the phone gets rid of them. Not true.
 
In her FB message Tammi Smith said on 1-27-2010 @ 1:53 pm
Paraphrased...about LE searching the landfills

Tammi says it shouldn't matter whan anyone thought, LE should have started searching after that text. (from Elizabeth to Logan stating she killed Gabriel.)
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php...#/photo.php?pid=643231&id=1585061919&comments

This was after saying from the beginning they believed Gabriel was alive and in fact had heard him crying while on the phone.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Smiths told CBS5 they are confident little Gabriel is alive. They were in contact with Elizabeth Johnson up until she was arrested, and they could hear Gabriel through the phone in the background.

"I heard the baby babble... I heard the baby cry, " Smith said.
http://www.kpho.com/news/22125969/detail.html

I suppose this means that what Tammi Fay is telling the world NOW is that she LIED when she said that, and that all us FOOLS, including law enforcement, should have KNOWN she was a liar from the very beginning.

I'm beginning to wonder how she's managed to stay out of the mental hospital so many years now.
 
Just wanted to post this as it has a lot of good info on TS & JS. It is all pretty much stuff we already knew -- just wanted this all in one place.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2581663/missing_baby_gabriel_johnson_tammi_pg3.html?cat=41

There is this, tho, in regards to the supposed friend of theirs in SA:

Update 1/26: Jack and Tammi Smith have a friend who lives in San Antonio. Police investigating baby Gabriel's disappearance have questioned this man but have not disclosed details of the interview.

Anyone know if we've ever heard either of them deny knowing anyone in SA?
 
Doesn't Jack know that LE can retrieve those text messages? People think that deleting them from the phone gets rid of them. Not true.

Should we assume that also goes for her MySpace and Facebook pages where she deletes the postings that are a little too close to the truth for her comfort level? Please tell me LE is monitoring everything....
 
Just wanted to post this as it has a lot of good info on TS & JS. It is all pretty much stuff we already knew -- just wanted this all in one place.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2581663/missing_baby_gabriel_johnson_tammi_pg3.html?cat=41

There is this, tho, in regards to the supposed friend of theirs in SA:



Anyone know if we've ever heard either of them deny knowing anyone in SA?

Is there a link from a news source on this friend? That blog is known for its inaccuracies.
 
According to azcentral, The Smiths have hired criminal attorney Mike Kimerer:
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/2010/01/28/20100128missingbaby01282010-CR.html

Kimerer's known for unsuccessfully using the homicidal somnabulism defense in the Scott Falater trial. (Falater was convicted of stabbing his wife Yarmila to death):

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1999-07-01/news/wake-up-call/1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicidal_somnambulism#Falater_case


He's also attorney of record for Debra Jean Milke, a mother convicted in the death of her young son. Milke has been in the local news lately because she may get a new trial soon.

http://www.debbiemilke.com/en/defense/kimererandderrick.shtml
 
According to azcentral, The Smiths have hired criminal attorney Mike Kimerer:
http://www.azcentral.com/12news/news/articles/2010/01/28/20100128missingbaby01282010-CR.html

Kimerer's known for unsuccessfully using the homicidal somnabulism defense in the Scott Falater trial. (Falater was convicted of stabbing his wife Yarmila to death):

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1999-07-01/news/wake-up-call/1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicidal_somnambulism#Falater_case


He's also attorney of record for Debra Jean Milke, a mother convicted in the death of her young son. Milke has been in the local news lately because she may get a new trial soon.

http://www.debbiemilke.com/en/defense/kimererandderrick.shtml

I'm so sick of hearing that people's attorneys have told them not to talk to LE, not to talk to the media. Just once I'd like to hear an attorney say, "And I immediately told my client they have got to do the right thing, and tell LE everything they know, and tell the truth right away. The most important we do is to help the endangered child in this case, and then we'll deal as best we can with the consequences to my client for any wrongdoing should any have taken place."

It's about the child. Always.
 
I'm just trying to figure out the reasoning for needing an atty that handles murder cases? I mean, if they didn't do anything wrong, wouldn't they just need an atty to help them with the media and guide them through?
 
I'm really not surprised the Smiths have obtained the services of an attorney. Actually, I'm surprised they didn't do it before now. But they know from Logan's recent interviews LE is including them in 'building the case' against EJ and he even indicated what LE is looking at for them, 'aiding in parental interference,' or something close to that.

I don't believe the fact this attorney has defended those accused of murder is anything of importance. It's just that he's a high-profile criminal attorney. I wouldn't even doubt if he called the Smiths first and they finally decided to obtain his services.

I sure hope they find Gabriel before any of this goes to trial. The longer EJ remains silent on where Gabriel is, the more I fear the worst.

JMHO
fran
 
http://www.kpho.com/video/22241483/index.html

After the "interview" with EJ's twin brother, there is a segment on TS and how she filled out the court documents for EG

The reporter asks, if we know you lied about this, how is it that we are supposed to believe anything you say, and Tammi' s answer "Just pray on it" and something to the effect that she just wanted to help someone not get hurt

This IMO is evidence of her attitude that as long as she is helping someone, that she is innocent, no matter what means of help she provides
 
I'm just trying to figure out the reasoning for needing an atty that handles murder cases? I mean, if they didn't do anything wrong, wouldn't they just need an atty to help them with the media and guide them through?

Just respectfully bumping a post by AZ lawyer from thread 18 page 4 to this thread because I think it is an answer to your question

Mike K is a well-known criminal lawyer here. He was president of the AZ Bar at one point, I believe, and is known for his creative approaches to defending his clients. He is also very comfortable with using the media to assist him in his defense.


Seems a natural fit, since the Smiths have been using in the media to assist them in their defense all along IMO
Oh and since the media recently mentioned that Temple police are trying to build a case against them, they would naturally need a criminal attorney IMO
 
http://www.kpho.com/video/22241483/index.html

After the "interview" with EJ's twin brother, there is a segment on TS and how she filled out the court documents for EG

The reporter asks, if we know you lied about this, how is it that we are supposed to believe anything you say, and Tammi' s answer "Just pray on it" and something to the effect that she just wanted to help someone not get hurt

This IMO is evidence of her attitude that as long as she is helping someone, that she is innocent, no matter what means of help she provides

She needs to be praying to get smart enough not to confess to committing a crime on nationwide television.
 
I've tried to figure why TS said she was going to be a 'foster mom' and referred to H's 'brother,' all AFTER EJ had picked up Gabriel to allegedly see LM. I think I may have finally made some sense of it. See what you think.

EJ gave Gabriel to TS and JS with the intentions of them adopting him. But when LM wouldn't cooperate and filed for custody, EJ knew the Smiths wouldn't be able to keep him. She needed a new plan to keep GJ away from LM. She unilaterally decided to take the baby somewhere else to rid herself of him, somewhere where LM didn't know about. Thus the trip to Texas.

The lie to the Ss that she was taking him to see his daddy may have just been the 'excuse' she used to get them to agree to let her leave with the child. When they may have objected, she may have told them that she'd take him to see his daddy to placate him but would return with the baby and they could be 'foster parents.'

Perhaps TS and JS really didn't know she was going to SA and when they found out she was gone from AZ and they finally had contact with her, they tried to persuade her to return. Thus the flurry of phone calls and messages, etc.....

It's possible that like others have said here, EJ may have made contact with another possible 'adoptive family' but she certainly couldn't tell TS that. After all, they thought they were going to get the baby. That's why they tried to hook her up with the gal Jan in Tn and their house they own there. But then EJ went completely rogue on the S's and we now have this messed up case.

Maybe the Ss don't know for sure, like us and LE, what happened to Gabriel. Like everyone else, they're working as if Gabriel is alive. They thought they could get EJ to at least talk to them, thus the insinuating themselves into the case. IMO, they may have liked the lime-lite, which, frankly did them no favors.

Now it's all coming back to bite them! That's what happens when you play with fire!

JMHO
fran

PS...........I started to put this on another thread here, but deleted it and brought it over here.

does anyone have an opinion on this theory? fran
 
I've tried to figure why TS said she was going to be a 'foster mom' and referred to H's 'brother,' all AFTER EJ had picked up Gabriel to allegedly see LM. I think I may have finally made some sense of it. See what you think.

...

does anyone have an opinion on this theory? fran

snipped by me...

I'm really on the fence about these people... their actions have just been very bizarre, but they also seem like the life they lead is somewhat bizarre, so that it might be "normal" for them???
 
I've tried to figure why TS said she was going to be a 'foster mom' and referred to H's 'brother,' all AFTER EJ had picked up Gabriel to allegedly see LM. I think I may have finally made some sense of it. See what you think.

EJ gave Gabriel to TS and JS with the intentions of them adopting him. But when LM wouldn't cooperate and filed for custody, EJ knew the Smiths wouldn't be able to keep him. She needed a new plan to keep GJ away from LM. She unilaterally decided to take the baby somewhere else to rid herself of him, somewhere where LM didn't know about. Thus the trip to Texas.

The lie to the Ss that she was taking him to see his daddy may have just been the 'excuse' she used to get them to agree to let her leave with the child. When they may have objected, she may have told them that she'd take him to see his daddy to placate him but would return with the baby and they could be 'foster parents.'

Perhaps TS and JS really didn't know she was going to SA and when they found out she was gone from AZ and they finally had contact with her, they tried to persuade her to return. Thus the flurry of phone calls and messages, etc.....

It's possible that like others have said here, EJ may have made contact with another possible 'adoptive family' but she certainly couldn't tell TS that. After all, they thought they were going to get the baby. That's why they tried to hook her up with the gal Jan in Tn and their house they own there. But then EJ went completely rogue on the S's and we now have this messed up case.

Maybe the Ss don't know for sure, like us and LE, what happened to Gabriel. Like everyone else, they're working as if Gabriel is alive. They thought they could get EJ to at least talk to them, thus the insinuating themselves into the case. IMO, they may have liked the lime-lite, which, frankly did them no favors.

Now it's all coming back to bite them! That's what happens when you play with fire!

JMHO
fran

PS...........I started to put this on another thread here, but deleted it and brought it over here.

does anyone have an opinion on this theory? fran

We are thinking alike.

ETA: and it would be great to have a thread to sleuth Eliz finding someone to give Gabe to w/o the Smiths knowing about it/being involved.
 
I've tried to figure why TS said she was going to be a 'foster mom' and referred to H's 'brother,' all AFTER EJ had picked up Gabriel to allegedly see LM. I think I may have finally made some sense of it. See what you think.

EJ gave Gabriel to TS and JS with the intentions of them adopting him. But when LM wouldn't cooperate and filed for custody, EJ knew the Smiths wouldn't be able to keep him. She needed a new plan to keep GJ away from LM. She unilaterally decided to take the baby somewhere else to rid herself of him, somewhere where LM didn't know about. Thus the trip to Texas.

The lie to the Ss that she was taking him to see his daddy may have just been the 'excuse' she used to get them to agree to let her leave with the child. When they may have objected, she may have told them that she'd take him to see his daddy to placate him but would return with the baby and they could be 'foster parents.'

Perhaps TS and JS really didn't know she was going to SA and when they found out she was gone from AZ and they finally had contact with her, they tried to persuade her to return. Thus the flurry of phone calls and messages, etc.....

It's possible that like others have said here, EJ may have made contact with another possible 'adoptive family' but she certainly couldn't tell TS that. After all, they thought they were going to get the baby. That's why they tried to hook her up with the gal Jan in Tn and their house they own there. But then EJ went completely rogue on the S's and we now have this messed up case.

Maybe the Ss don't know for sure, like us and LE, what happened to Gabriel. Like everyone else, they're working as if Gabriel is alive. They thought they could get EJ to at least talk to them, thus the insinuating themselves into the case. IMO, they may have liked the lime-lite, which, frankly did them no favors.

Now it's all coming back to bite them! That's what happens when you play with fire!

JMHO
fran

PS...........I started to put this on another thread here, but deleted it and brought it over here.

does anyone have an opinion on this theory? fran

Seems well-thought out and plausible. I especially agree with the part about EJ going rogue.

I also tend to think that the idea of "abandonment" was a strategy given to EJ by TS. I wouldn't be surprised if TS has used this successfully before in getting custody of JS's grandchild. IF that is true, then I think the Smiths coached her to run rather than let Logan have Gabe for his lawful period of custody. The timer was already running on that 30 days, so I think the plan was to keep the count-down going so they could charge "abandonment".

I suppose it is possible that the Smiths only gave her the strategy and helped her falsify documents before she ran, and then didn't know anything from the time she took off. But with their very high need to be in control, I don't think so. The way Tammi has proven herself to be a habitual liar, I have to look at everything she says as a potential lie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
168
Guests online
472
Total visitors
640

Forum statistics

Threads
625,786
Messages
18,509,982
Members
240,846
Latest member
riversmama23
Back
Top