PASA
Verified Juanette
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,781
- Reaction score
- 6
Knives at restaurants are very, very sharp. Just saying. jmo
I wonder if any of the kitchen knives at Casa Ramos went missing?
Knives at restaurants are very, very sharp. Just saying. jmo
Hey does anyone know if the parts of the media interviews she did that were NOT used can still be used in trial? 48 Hrs. , Inside Edition, her local press conference?
I am not saying that he deserved to die but his actions innocent or not play into why she did what she did and I can't wait to see te defense will show.
![]()
This could be the type of knife used. Very sharp and durable yet foldable. Would slash tires and used as a weapon.
Additionally, when she was stabbing him 9 times in the back, she was "defending" herself from an attack. His BACK was to her, meaning she just had to turn around and run away. By stabbing him in the back she is an (arguably) aggressive position.
On one of the shows the other night, one of the lawyers was arguing that the State spent too much time focusing on Jodi's changing stories and should have instead hammered on the elements of the crime (premeditation and intent). He likened it to Casey's case and said that it just confused the jury to put on so much evidence of the lies.
I see his point, but disagree. Since Jodi is presumably going to be testifying for her self defense claim, she'll be giving a new account of what happened. (Her 4th version?). It's extremely important for the State to convince the jury that Jodi has absolutely no credibility and should not be believed. The only way to do that is by introducing all of the evidence of her previous lies about what happened to Travis. It's important to show that Jodi will say whatever she thinks will help her at any given moment.
Think about it -- no matter what Jodi says now, no one is going to take it as the truth. It reminds me of Joran Van der Sloot ...he gave so many different accounts of his time with Natalee Holloway that even when he later implicated himself on hidden camera, no one believed him still.
I wonder if any of the kitchen knives at Casa Ramos went missing?
I can totally understand this. I have had a lot of people say I don't care what Travis did he did not deserve to die and I tell them, I am not saying that he deserved to die but his actions innocent or not play into why she did what she did and I can't wait to see te defense will show.
I can totally understand this. I have had a lot of people say I don't care what Travis did he did not deserve to die and I tell them, I am not saying that he deserved to die but his actions innocent or not play into why she did what she did and I can't wait to see te defense will show.
Third, I've noticed that Jodi has repeatedly mentioned that things seemed like a dream or a movie. I think that she has a sense that something larger than herself was being played out in Travis' killing; thus, her self-possession and her repeated professions of innocence and undying love. She is one weird and very frightening cookie.
On one of the shows the other night, one of the lawyers was arguing that the State spent too much time focusing on Jodi's changing stories and should have instead hammered on the elements of the crime (premeditation and intent). He likened it to Casey's case and said that it just confused the jury to put on so much evidence of the lies.
I see his point, but disagree. Since Jodi is presumably going to be testifying for her self defense claim, she'll be giving a new account of what happened. (Her 4th version?). It's extremely important for the State to convince the jury that Jodi has absolutely no credibility and should not be believed. The only way to do that is by introducing all of the evidence of her previous lies about what happened to Travis. It's important to show that Jodi will say whatever she thinks will help her at any given moment.
Think about it -- no matter what Jodi says now, no one is going to take it as the truth. It reminds me of Joran Van der Sloot ...he gave so many different accounts of his time with Natalee Holloway that even when he later implicated himself on hidden camera, no one believed him still.
I know..i do not believe in this case that she ...out of the blue.. killed him because she was jealous or mad ..We all had break ups..hell i did...i would not eat and would totally hate the person that left me...but theres more to the story here...yes she killed him...did she wake up one day and was like :OHHH let me kill him because we only have sex...nah....
One ex of Jodi said that she had a finger that was broken by TA.... was he violent.... or just fed up by her? maybe..who knows...
We might really know our friends but we dont... I dont give here credits to Jodi but theres more to the story and we MIGHT never know..like CA....
![]()
This could be the type of knife used. Very sharp and durable yet foldable. Would slash tires and used as a weapon.
No no an ex said that her finger was permanently damage after TA broke it..i was not talking about the cutsHi, Populju. Actually, in one of the interrogation videos, Jodi herself showed the finger injury to the interviewer and said that the female Ninja did it. That, of course, is a lie, but it seems that an injury like that might have received in her final vigorous slashing of Travis.
It seems reasonable to assume that Jodi was responsible for hacking, tire slashing, fake emails, and other acts directly or indirectly against Travis. She was not an average person suffering from a breakup.
I missed the discussion on Flores' interview techniques because I had not yet registered, but I wanted to add my astonishment in how controlled and skillful he is.
As a matter of fact, his composure nearly matches Jodie's. Not only does he keep shame and judgment out of his voice, but he is very soft spoken as well. After two hours in a room with him I would pretty much have confessed to anything.
I like how he let her spin out the Ninja Tale, fully knowing it was all made up, so he could get some REAL details. When the story is over, he starts pointing out inconsistencies. If he had done this while she was speaking she would have clammed up (like when she said it was two men, then a man and a woman). It takes a very controlled person to keep his powder dry and listen carefully without interruption. I know it's his job, but I find it a really extraordinary example of a suspect interview.
I know they delved into interview "techniques" and I wish I knew more about this in general. If any websleuths have links or resources about the process of suspect interview, I'd be interested in seeing them.
No no an ex said that her finger was permanently damage after TA broke it..i was not talking about the cuts
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.