The State v. Jodi Arias: break in trial until 28 January 2013 #13 *ADULT CONTENT*

[Really?]

I'm thinking TA never traveled into the abyss. Too smart for that. jmo

:floorlaugh:Lol:floorlaugh:

 

[katiecoolady]

I'm afraid to watch---I have two young ones and it's hard for me to go there. Maybe I'll get my courage up this weekend.

It will be there for when you're ready....it would be a very hard story for a mother with little ones to watch.

 

[popsicle]

What is a "shark week" photo(s)?

I hate being new to a case...I don't get all the references. I pick up quick, though! Thanks!

lol One of the photos of her vjayjay looked like it had teeth. Someone on here named the week we were discussing her nekkid pics "shark week". :floorlaugh:

 

[lil_buddy]

I don't get what the heck is supposed to determined at the evidentiary hearing either.

There must be some sort of motion on file for this hearing. Wish we could see it.

 

[PASA]

I imagine she will be going to Federal prison.:jail: I think Sheriff Joe likes to brag about his women's chain gang!

She is currently in county jail. When she is convicted and sentenced she will be transferred to state prison.

HTH

 

[FrayedKnot]

Thanks.

I looked up what evidentiary hearing means in Arizona and Im a little confused. Is this where Jodi has to convince the Judge that self defense should be an option to the jury?:waitasec:

Rule 32.8. Evidentiary hearing

a. Evidentiary Hearing. The defendant shall be entitled to a hearing to determine issues of material fact, with the right to be present and to subpoena witnesses. If facilities are available, the court may, in its discretion, order the hearing to be held at the place where the defendant is confined, giving at least 15 days notice to the officer in charge of the confinement facility. In superior court, the hearing shall be recorded.

b. Evidence. The rules of evidence applicable in criminal proceedings shall apply, except that the defendant may be called to testify at the hearing.

c. Burden of Proof. The defendant shall have the burden of proving the allegations of fact by a preponderance of the evidence. If a constitutional defect is proven, the state shall have the burden of proving that the defect was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

d. Decision. The court shall rule within 10 days after the hearing ends except in extraordinary circumstances where the volume of the evidence or the complexity of the issues require additional time. If the court finds in favor of the defendant, it shall enter an appropriate order with respect to the conviction, sentence or detention, any further proceedings, including a new trial and conditions of release, and other matters that may be necessary and proper. The court shall make specific findings of fact, and state expressly its conclusions of law relating to each issue presented.

e. Transcript. The court may, and shall upon request of a party within the time for filing a petition for review, order that a certified transcript of the evidentiary hearing be prepared. The preparation of the evidentiary hearing transcript shall be at county expense if the defendant is indigent.


http://www.arizonacrimelaws.com/32_8.htm

OBE:

Can you translate for me in regular people speak? I'm embarrassed but I read that over and over and I'm foggy.

Does it mean the DT has to prove the evidence they plan to present has merit? And if it is allowed, and the PT objects, then the burden is on them, the PT to prove the evidence as inadmissible?

TIA!

 

[katiecoolady]

"I've been on Facebook and MySpace a lot...looking at his profile...looking at his pictures..." Jodi says in some kind of interview. Meaning after she killed him. Still obsessing. Gawd she probably had some kind of "Dear Travis" psycho closet somewhere...or shrine in her cell.:jail:

 

[Sulamith]

She is currently in county jail. When she is convicted and sentenced she will be transferred to state prison.

HTH

Thank you, PASA! I will have to look up the diff. between Fed. and State prison.

 

[bobloblaw]

I wouldnt be the least bit surprised that she cheated on the guy she lived with for four years. She couldnt have loved him at all to just up and leave him shortly after she met Travis.

IMO

She left that guy four days after meeting Travis. Pretty sure she was cheating right there.
Typical gold digger move.

 

[polleypockets]

he also commented on her shifting eyes, being in the fetal position and hiding behind her hair while she's making up her story, her choice of words, and playing with her pant leg to maintain control.

does regular body movement expertise apply to some one who is a psychopath or sociopath?

 

[LinasK]

"I've been on Facebook and MySpace a lot...looking at his profile...looking at his pictures..." Jodi says in some kind of interview. Meaning after she killed him. Still obsessing. Gawd she probably had some kind of "Dear Travis" psycho closet somewhere...or shrine in her cell.:jail:

Well...considering she was upset that she couldn't speak to him. Gee Jodi, maybe you should've thought of that before you killed him!!!:banghead::banghead::banghead:

 

[FrayedKnot]

She left that guy four days after meeting Travis. Pretty sure she was cheating right there.
Typical gold digger move.

I think that guy probably help her pack her bags. And bought her a bus ticket.

 

[polleypockets]

I don't get what the heck is supposed to determined at the evidentiary hearing either.

There must be some sort of motion on file for this hearing. Wish we could see it.

in session said they will broadcast it live

 

[katiecoolady]

does regular body movement expertise apply to some one who is a psychopath or sociopath?

That's a really good question.

I'm gonna go ask Janine D. on her FB page....let ya know if she responds.

 

[LinasK]

does regular body movement expertise apply to some one who is a psychopath or sociopath?

He was describing behaviors of lying and Beth Karras asked him why jurors weren't given a crash course in this.
I've seen alot of the same behaviors in Scott Peterson, Susan Smith, and Casey Anthony in their interviews.

 

[Wishbone]

I don't get what the heck is supposed to determined at the evidentiary hearing either.

There must be some sort of motion on file for this hearing. Wish we could see it.

I may be wrong, but I thought the defense was going to challenge the death penalty by submitting evidence that this case doesn’t meet the criteria because she didn’t break into the house or something like that even though there were terrible injuries inflicted on TA? . I’m not clear at all on that though.

 

[katiecoolady]

He was describing behaviors of lying and Beth Karras asked him why jurors weren't given a crash course in this.
I've seen alot of the same behaviors in Scott Peterson, Susan Smith, and Casey Anthony in their interviews.

Who did you see LinasK? I saw Janine Driver on Christi Paul's show this am.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Isnt Monday an evidentuary hearing?

All I can think of is they are wanting to add him to the list at a late date on the witness list.

She's already ruled on prosecutorial misconduct right?

Was it a hearing asked for by the defense?

tia

Judge will hear Dt on prosecutorial misconduct on Monday, the 28th and then rule on that. That is when Gus Searcy is supposed to testify for the DT. No one knows what he will be asked. Or, it hasn't leaked yet.

 

[lil_buddy]

in session said they will broadcast it live

I meant I wish I could see RIGHT NOW the court documents showing exactly what is at issue in this evidentiary hearing.

 

[katiecoolady]

I may be wrong, but I thought the defense was going to challenge the death penalty by submitting evidence that this case doesn’t meet the criteria because she didn’t break into the house or something like that even though there were terrible injuries inflicted on TA? . I’m not clear at all on that though.

The defense was challenging the felony murder alternative charge in this trial. Claiming she was an invited guest therefore doesn't qualify for the felony while committing the murder aspect of the charge. The felony being burglary.

The Judge didn't agree with them though and she ruled with the State so the felony murder alternative charge remains. This is kind of huge for the State because now the jurors don't all have to agree on premeditation for a conviction/death sentence.