The State v. Jodi Arias: break in trial until 28 January 2013 #16 *ADULT CONTENT*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #821
Seems like she has abandonment issues. I wonder if her father abandoned the family. Her rage towards TA may have been some sort of deeps seated issue she has with men stemming from something to do with her father and family dynamics. That is my unprofessional opinion.

Sounds just like a psychopath to me.

I think they are still married and own a diner.

He has not talked to Jodi since she has been in jail from what I have read. Imo he believes she is guilty and is not an enabler like her mom tends to be.

imo
 
  • #822
Okay just finished catching up who the heck was in the car with GS?

We still don't know. They went into the judge's chamber to discuss it.
 
  • #823
If people are shocked or whatnot...why was that 50 shades book such a block buster...it wasn't the writing imo....I still question why people were so attached to it other than the sex....:moo::blushing:

You're right! It was the sex!
Then it became the romance.
Women love that! Imo
 
  • #824
The lapse in time when answering, and his choked up whisper, was even as damaging as the answer itself.

Listening to it several times makes me wonder if both the lapse and change in voice weren't due to a long sip of water. It sounds like it more and more to me.
 
  • #825
IMO, when Nurmi asked about "little boys underwear" it is really "boy shorts", that many many many females wear.
 
  • #826
  • #827
does anyone know if there is video from the evidentiary part of the trial yesterday?

tia

[video=youtube;z4bTzT-c0DI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4bTzT-c0DI[/video]
 
  • #828
IMO, when Nurmi asked about "little boys underwear" it is really "boy shorts", that many many many females wear.

Ive thought the same things since I first heard it said. They are going for the shock value - and "boy shorts" is too commonly known for women's underwear, they are saying "little boys underwear" to make it sound more deviant than it REALLY is! :furious:
 
  • #829
Heading out in a few then I'll be off line other than my iphone rest of the day. Should get to the courthouse around 12:30 and will go straight to stake out my seat. :please:

If you want to stalk me, I'm wearing a white shirt and a big honking heart necklace that's made out of wood so it will look dark. And I look just like my photo, without the Bieber wig (and straighter hair).

Wish me luck! I'm goin in....:seeya:

Yay, Katie! So that means you will be in the afternoon/after-lunch session, right? That occurs around 3:30 Eastern time, for those who want to watch for Katie. Thanks in advance for your excellent reporting!
 
  • #830
Women went gaga because for the sex scenes. per Oprah

but then they kept going on and on like it was some masterpiece....If that was a masterpiece in the making ............
 
  • #831
Only if they agree to talk with them though.

No one can be made to talk to the defense or state unless they subpoena them and then they can still refuse to talk citing the 5th.

Correct. But they cannot plead the fifth overall. It is a plead you apply to each question and it applies only if your answer is going to incriminate you and under oath.
 
  • #832
No source...it just seems weird to me that Nurmi said he had today and tomorrow filled with testimony. How could he be sure unless he is going to keep the same witness on the stand both days. jmo

And Thursday was very recently added to the schedule.
 
  • #833
Well all I can say he better not have told anyone else a different story. That can come back to haunt him. I no more believe in four years they only had anal sex one or twice and then stopped.

Maybe they will have someone else to rebut what he said.

Maybe that was how Jodi hooked him? An open and inviting young woman offering you access to all of her orifices for your sexual pleasure? Quite a hook don't you think?
 
  • #834
but then they kept going on and on like it was some masterpiece....If that was a masterpiece in the making ............

It was nothing to write home about IMO.
 
  • #835
For real? You got a source for that? If so... I must prepare! I have Snacks to get, turn off my phones, etc...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If this is true it will be a hot water and ramon noodle kind of dinner tonight.
 
  • #836
I know, Linda had asked about Abe.

I was joking that he didn't look like a phone on Dr. Drew. lol

sometimes I'm a bit slow..........:blushing:
 
  • #837
omg.. nurmi really wants to get the fake letters (that already got rejected) in.

how in the hello could he do that???

(hoping minor4th or gitanna is around)
 
  • #838
No source...it just seems weird to me that Nurmi said he had today and tomorrow filled with testimony. How could he be sure unless he is going to keep the same witness on the stand both days. jmo

That doesn't mean she is testifying. It could just mean he has witnesses lined up for today and tomorrow, as they are supposed to.
 
  • #839
IMO, when Nurmi asked about "little boys underwear" it is really "boy shorts", that many many many females wear.
And in terms of pedophilia most sexual offenders have very precise preferences. IMO one wouldn't be into girls wearing boys clothing...not to mention her age alone kinda refutes the defense's claims in my opinion.

(Those letters, this allegation, just infuriate me. :furious: I think I come very close to hating her for what she's alleging just to further denigrate him.)
 
  • #840
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
144
Guests online
1,863
Total visitors
2,007

Forum statistics

Threads
632,451
Messages
18,626,889
Members
243,158
Latest member
bcallred
Back
Top