The Strawberry birthmark and other things about Kyron

[gwenabob]

It's interesting to me when TH is compared to Casey Anthony or Scott Peterson, because there was so much more information in both of those cases~IMO, TH's not in their league yet (need more proof!)...

I disagree. There was little or no evidence against Scott Peterson 6 weeks into the investigation. Nothing solid anyway, just a lot of circumstantial evidence and gut feelings. I knew OJ was lying, I knew Casey was lying, and I knew Scott was lying. And now I know Terri is lying. I will depend on LE and the DA to present the evidence my gut already knows exists.

 

[BeanE]

IIRC, it was worded, "No"

Is it when Desiree said she'd never even spoken to Terri until a year and a half after Kyron was born that you're referring to, Calliope? Or a different statement?

 

[debs]

I disagree. There was little or no evidence against Scott Peterson 6 weeks into the investigation. Nothing solid anyway, just a lot of circumstantial evidence and gut feelings. I knew OJ was lying, I knew Casey was lying, and I knew Scott was lying. And now I know Terri is lying. I will depend on LE and the DA to present the evidence my gut already knows exists.

What has Terri said in public that you base your knowledge on her lying? I haven't heard a word from her.

 

[gardeness]

I disagree. There was little or no evidence against Scott Peterson 6 weeks into the investigation. Nothing solid anyway, just a lot of circumstantial evidence and gut feelings. I knew OJ was lying, I knew Casey was lying, and I knew Scott was lying. And now I know Terri is lying. I will depend on LE and the DA to present the evidence my gut already knows exists.

We can disagree~I have no problem with that. I have no inclination to dig anything up on Scott Peterson, but there was plenty of circumstantial evidence early-on-----wayyyyyy more than anything they have released on Terri.

I didn't care about OJ (I was going through my own domestic problems right then), I knew Casey and Scott were lying, and I am waiting for more proof on Terri before deciding.

 

[Calliope]

That's exactly what all the Scott Peterson apologists said too...

Perhaps, but regardless of that it's true. For over 25 years, I've dealt with people during the most stressful times of their lives and in all stages of grief. I can honestly say nothing surprises me any more, and there is no "normal".

 

[gwenabob]

We can disagree~I have no problem with that. I have no inclination to dig anything up on Scott Peterson, but there was plenty of circumstantial evidence early-on-----wayyyyyy more than anything they have released on Terri.

Nope.
We knew he was the last to see her, (check)
We knew he staged a phony "kidnapping" (check)
We knew he lied about where he was that day..."I was golfing...I was fishing...I was, er...?" (check)
He had a secret fling (check)
There was no evidence of murder on the premises (check)
He showed inappropriate behavior for someone who was "grieving" -(check)

Hmmm. Sounds familiar!

Now all we have to do is wait for the body to appear. May G_d grant us this one prayer.

 

[wondering1]

Perhaps, but regardless of that it's true. For over 25 years, I've dealt with people during the most stressful times of their lives and in all stages of grief. I can honestly say nothing surprises me any more, and there is no "normal".

with respect, just because you've seen and heard it all doesn't make all you've seen and heard *normal.* I'm guessing your experience requires that you address these people's issues without judgment, i.e., like a grief counselor or psychologist, as opposed to one who is required to form an opnion about the behavior, like a custody evaluator or forensic psychologist? Actually, I guess I'm asking that question. What is your frame of reference?

 

[Kimster]

Closed. Completely Off Topic.