The surveillance video-**identified** man and the box of wine

[Donjeta]

"Police investigated and discovered the man was a neighbor who gave Bradley a ride to the grocery store."

http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...other-out-shopping-the-night-of-disappearance

Well, that's still a somewhat confusing wording. They had to investigate before they discovered? As opposed to she told them right away when they asked about her day?

Why did she need a ride, does she not have a vehicle?

If she doesn't Lisa couldn't be far if the Mom did it and didn't have help.

 

[LaLaw2000]

Phew, thank goodness as I thought I was starting to have some serious issues. :floorlaugh:

:floorlaugh:

Me too, Patty G! But then I am always having serious issues!

 

[raeann]

You're right. I'm back-azzwards.

I suppose it could be possible for some men, but I doubt the change in side burn style.

And just some general questions, not directed at you.

If LE isn't concerned about him, does it matter who he is? If he's a friend/family member who is normally around to help out why wouldn't he be around after Lisa went missing. Does Deborah drive?

I don't think it matters at all, friend, relative, neighbor whatever. I have ridden to the store with others, and I have taken them with me to the store. No big deal....if my neighbors are in the yard when I leave... I even stop and ask if they need me to get anything while I'm there. Maybe that's a local kind of thing....but its not suspect or unusual in any way. My intent was to show that it was just someone known to all involved and NOT anything scandalous as LE stated.

jmo

 

[CarrieBean]

Well, that's still a somewhat confusing wording. They had to investigate before they discovered? As opposed to she told them right away when they asked about her day?

Why did she need a ride, does she not have a vehicle?

If she doesn't Lisa couldn't be far if the Mom did it and didn't have help.

It would be nice if they would stick to straight facts, huh?

 

[LaLaw2000]

Well, that's still a somewhat confusing wording. They had to investigate before they discovered? As opposed to she told them right away when they asked about her day?

Why did she need a ride, does she not have a vehicle?

If she doesn't Lisa couldn't be far if the Mom did it and didn't have help.

O/T kind of, but whose vehicle is the big white Lincoln that was in the driveway at the beginning? It is no longer there, but was for a while.

 

[Katana]

Who are we supposed to be sleuthing now? Mom and dad right? So why are we posting pictures of this person until he involves himself and comes forward and speaks.

This could be innocent and we are not going to sleuth people just because the news caught them in a shot. Comparing photos?

When the person in the store video speaks out, or when msm reports on him then we move forward WITH ONLY WHAT IS REPORTED.

Law enforcement said this is a non issue right?

The only thing is see as debatable now is did the mom tell le about this trip to the store or was this one of the items left out in questioning.

I know what you are saying but, it does help to know who she was with to decide if she would hide this information and why. Now that I know who she was with it, explains why LE says this is a moot point. Even if she didn't tell LE about it, I think the trip was innocent enough in nature and there really isn't much to the story.

 

[butwhatif?]

I personally don't see any baby food or wipes being bought on video. Only a box of wine. I don't know how the store figured out about baby food or wipes. First they said paper plates and napkins, that changed to baby food and wipes, but I don't see any from that video.

It's edited. Notice the timestamps.....
They enter at 4:46:12
They're in the wine section at 4:49:25 then there's a 14 second edit of the video.
They're at the check-out by 4:50:58 and you see them leave at 4:52.25. He is clearly carrying a shopping bag and she has something from the store in her hand too.

It was a quick shop. In and out in 6 mins.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/44872173#44872173

 

[grandmaj]

The neighbor that gave her a ride to the store is not sleuthable. So everyone carry on from here and remember to be careful not to involve people who have not been named in MSM or haven't spoken out.

As far as that FB and the rumors that were brought here today. If it continues I'm sorry to say there are going to be consequences. Once again it was a rumor that was proven false.

 

[Patty G]

I deleted my post with the photo just in case anyone is looking for it and will wait until the man is formally identified or speaks to the media.

 

[nursebeeme]

Wonderful.

MODS: Can we update the title to say "neighbor"? :crazy:

fixed 'er

 

[CarrieBean]

This is all driving me batty. I'm off to enjoy our last warm day outside. Hopefully Lisa is found before I get back.

 

[GourmetSoy]

Well, that's still a somewhat confusing wording. They had to investigate before they discovered? As opposed to she told them right away when they asked about her day?

Why did she need a ride, does she not have a vehicle?

If she doesn't Lisa couldn't be far if the Mom did it and didn't have help.

BBM
My thought was that JI was home with the kids during her trip to the store. If he was home, wouldn't she have access to his vehicle if they only had one? I don't know how many vehicles they have but at the very least they have one. Unless she doesn't have a drivers license.

So either JI wasn't home with the kids or someone else was sitting with them while she went to the store.

 

[CA Lady]

LE was looking for a missing child. They found a receipt, either on their own or by the mother telling them about it. They asked the grocery store for the video. My thought is, LE was trying to verify if baby Lisa may be seen in the video, to see if they could find evidence she was known to be alive at a confirmed time.

 

[In da Middle]

:floorlaugh:I sure hope I am not caught on any video on this story! Just sayin... And just in case I am, no, I did not have anything to do with this case other than live here!

 

[frankie069]

remember peeps... it is okay to disagree... but attack the post not the poster

:blowkiss:

I just got home and saw we have an "IDENTIFIED" man now and I see how a lot of the posts are going. I am new here so I dont know how this forum usually works and being on other boards, I know how they were about the CA trial. We actually had to have our own board away from the people that thought she was innocent. Its a shame. EVERYONE is passionate about this topic. No one is going to agree 100%, even if 10 of us think she is guilty or innocent we are going to have our own reasons for thinking the way that we do. We have to remember, on this particular topic right now, we are all here for the same reason and that is the hope that Lisa is still alive and if not, that her killer is caught and brought to justice. I hope I havent spoke out of line. :innocent:

 

[Mojen]

:floorlaugh:I sure hope I am not caught on any video on this story! Just sayin... And just in case I am, no, I did not have anything to do with this case other than live here!

I will admit to watching the news and wondering if I was watching In da Middle and not knowing it. :innocent:

I will also admit to mentally calling you Malcolm.

 

[c@rol]

My take away from this is that she does not appear to be upset or in distress in any way in the video.

 

[Angleena]

I think a lot can be explained by this video.

It's possible the man that was with her was under the age of 21 and therefore could not buy alcohol. Maybe she was buying it for him and she didn't want to say anything to LE about it because she didn't want to be charged with providing alcohol to someone under age.

She failed her lie detector test with LE. Maybe she failed her lie detector test because of this. If her test showed deception, and she said that she was unable to fill in the gaps in her time line, this could be one of those gaps that she could/would not fill in.

Just a thought.

 

[Mountain_Kat]

BBM
My thought was that JI was home with the kids during her trip to the store. If he was home, wouldn't she have access to his vehicle if they only had one? I don't know how many vehicles they have but at the very least they have one. Unless she doesn't have a drivers license.

So either JI wasn't home with the kids or someone else was sitting with them while she went to the store.

I had those same exact thoughts, Gourmet. Also now starting to wonder if this is the neighbor DB was refering to when she said she stayed outside talking to the neighbor for awhile that night. For some reason, I was under the impression that this neighbor was a woman, but maybe I was mistaken in that? :waitasec:

 

[~n/t~]

:floorlaugh:I sure hope I am not caught on any video on this story! Just sayin... And just in case I am, no, I did not have anything to do with this case other than live here!

:floorlaugh:


Be sure to let us know if you are though so we won't sleuth you and wonder if you're the kidnapper!