BlueCrab said:
Camper,
According to my information, the entire White family testified at the grand jury hearings, which would be Fleet, Jr., Priscilla, and their two children, Fleet III (about Burke's age) and Daphne (about JonBenet's age). I believe the jurors asked many of the right questions because it was Fleet and Little Fleet who disclosed that Burke owned Hi-Tec boots after the Ramseys denied anyone in the family having ever owned Hi-Tecs.
Grand juries are independant, largely unstructured, report to the court, but are somewhat guided by the D.A. They are powerful and able to investigate anyone and anything they want to get to the truth. They are assigned their own team of professional investigators. The Ramsey grand jurors investigated for 13 months, from September of 1998 to October of 1999, and I believe they solved the case. IMO children too young to prosecute were involved; therefore no indictments were issued; a gag order was placed on the case; and that's where things stand to this day.
BlueCrab
Welll, I will yet again pose the question that I have posed for umpteen times, over 8.5 years. HOW deep is the law prohibiting and 'protecting' the names of 'children' 10 and under who are found guilty? Does this law encompass the person/parent who covers for their child? For IF the parent were exposed in the media for writing the phony ransom note, then all thinking folk would then know the child was underage, huh? BUT, IF the note were written to protect a young adult child, then heads would have rolled.
This is why I do think that NOT all of the right questions were asked by the GJ, if your supposition is that White 'knows' something besides what came out in the GJ proceedings.
I refer to your post (BlueCrab)at 9:49 pm
However, IMO Fleet White and Priscilla know who killed JonBenet. The Ramseys know the Whites know, and that's what is behind the smear campaign the Ramseys have been engaged in -- trying to make the Whites appear to have been behaving strangely. It won't work. IMO Fleet has the evidence and will make his court appearances when and if needed. The court gag order on the case also keeps him in check for now.
I find this to be a mixture of mental confusion, perhaps White just hoped and wished that 'the child' would get professional help. Surely White would not want the boy to be exposed, although IF the truth had been told either accidentally or purposefully by their friend White, lives would be comforted and gone comfortably on by now, imop.
Betcha the GJ did not even talk or ask questions about the OLDEST son, who had been officially cleared by BPD, cuz HE had alibi's up the gazoo. WE do not know, do WE, whether the GJ asked or did not ask about HIM. I am guessing that they were mum on the oldest son. Therefore I am hanging on to my 'PET' theory.
DID the oldest son already OWN --- or receive 'THE' or 'a' scarf for Christmas OR at the party of the 23rd, a great BIG hmmm for me. As Thorkim said, 'Dig her up.
BUT ask the guests at the party of the 23rd, DID JAR receive a scarf at that party, and what color was IT.
Recall the quick pic at the cemetary of JAR. Plus the mag interview with JAR asking forgiveness for the killer, before the dirt from the digging of JonBenet's grave had settled.
.
