This Week on Websleuths Radio Attorney Richard Hornsby

[babycat]

Anybody know if Websleuths Radio will be available on Stitcher Podcast radio, or otherwise streaming on smart phone?

 

[cherishtoo]

That is my question as well and why I think he State should have filed a Motion in Limine to block arguing such a theory without experts who would provide the necessary link between being molested as a child and being unable to either (1) report the death of your child or (2) grieve over the death of your child.

Is it possible that the defense is just now trying to get their expert in?

On 5/26 Baez was asking JP to sign a motion for approval for the transcripts of Dr. Krop. On 5/27 the defense filed a Supplemental Defense Witness List, which (I believe) we haven't seen yet.

 

[ThinkTank]

Is it possible that the defense is just now trying to get their expert in?

On 5/26 Baez was asking JP to sign a motion for approval for the transcripts of Dr. Krop. On 5/27 the defense filed a Supplemental Defense Witness List, which (I believe) we haven't seen yet.

We have not seen the new witness on the Defense Supplemental Witness List - yet.
But Dr. Krop was added to the Defense Penalty Phase Witness List on Dec 30, 2010.
I believe the Defense is now asking the Judge to order JAC to pay for Dr. Krop's fees (not his transcript). Dr. Krop has not been deposed by the State.

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26331346/detail.html
DEFENDANT'S SECOND PENALTY PHASE DISCOVERY RESPONSE

Dr. Harry Krop - Penalty Phase expert - Psychologist - Gainesville, FL
added Dec 30, 2010

new jail visitor in February - Psychologist Harry Krop - 3 1/2 hours on Feb 15, 2011
former forensic psychology expert for the State of Florida
focused on competency and mitigating factors
currently in private practice - is an associate professor in the Dept of Psychiatry at UF


https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1eypXuLsh5uatd0yhKQPIBl3_qCYIw5K-bc0q2jEVkHo&hl=en
STATE WITNESS LIST

https://docs.google.com/document/edit?id=1SJuT6ZnZa_DMbH7rK5QXMFWMCG9xV7KVoIjLLRZfg_E&hl=en
DEFENSE WITNESS LIST

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t1IKoWtQFXbILJ9pVMwT-c0dXhXOtFw-u5N2jfvVJM0/edit?hl=en
DEFENSE PENALTY PHASE WITNESS LIST

 

[ynotdivein]

RH, I am so looking forward to hearing you tonight on WS radio.

Do you think CJBP will rule that the sexual abuse allegations be verboten unless and until a witness provides direct testimony about it?

And if so, what if anything can the SA do to "un-ring the bell" in the jurors' minds? I know that they will be instructed to disregard opening statements on both sides as evidence, but JB opened a barn door with his allegations. How can the SA keep the horses from running wild in the jurors' minds, as it were?

 

[Oakley]

Generally, the attorney who is most likely to elicit an adverse reaction from a witness should be the one to cross examine the witness.

Casey has specifically expressed her dislike for Ashton.

Also, Linda is a very methodical questioner, meaning it would be easier for Casey to maintain a consistency and time continuum with Linda's style of questioning. On the other hand, Jeff is better at examining without a scrit if you will and is more comfortable being argumentative with witnesses, whereas Linda maintains her composure and level.

ITA You, Mr Hornsby, are simply *brilliant!* But don't let that go to your head, OK?

So looking forward to tonight's broadcast! :great:

 

[Tricia]

Counting down to tonight's show.

5 PM PST - 6 PM MST - 7 PM CST - 8 PM EST.

GO HERE http://www.latalkradio.com/ and click on the "Listen Live 2" button on the right hand side of the page at showtime.

Number to call for questions 1-818-602-4929

Scrambling to get it all together.

See you tonight on the radio

 

[beach]

:bump:

 

[ynotdivein]

Bumping with one hour to go...

 

[Noddy]

Question: At the risk of sounding totally naive, can the jury render their verdict before all the evidence is in? You know, the guilty verdict. :innocent:

 

[Tricia]

Almost show time. About 35 minutes. Don't forget you can call in at 818-602-4929/

Richard Hornsby and Kimster will be our guests.

Go to http://www.latalkradio.com and look for the big "listen live 2" button on the right hand side of the page. Showtime is at the top of this hour.
5PM Pacific/8PM Eastern.

 

[ynotdivein]

Tricia, do you want members to post questions here on this thread, or chat, or both?

 

[tlcya]

gonna have to be here as the chat button not up there this week ynotdivein, at least for the moment.

Have a great show everyone, looking forward to RH's thoughts

 

[tlcya]

CBS news covering Pres in Joplin

 

[janine]

oooooh- Excited to hear Mr. Hornsby's thoughts. :great:

 

[tlcya]

Can RH think of any reason why the SAO did NOT file a motion to prevent the DT from all this abuse excuse carpolla?

I am in total agreement with you that they should have filed a Motion in Limine.

Just wondering if there is some strategic advantage that could be gained on their part by not having done so right there as soon as JB started telling his tale?

Is it possible they are letting him flail about a bit, count on playing this particular card and then snatch it out from under him down the road, forcing him to come up with yet another defense on the fly?

The SAO seems so very prepared for this trial I am just really puzzled by their not doing so.

 

[LaLaw2000]

Anxiously waiting!! Gonna be a great show!

 

[ynotdivein]

http://www.latalkradio.com/

Hit the "listen live" button on the right side of your screen.

 

[tlcya]

o/t but I love the new bolding of the mod's hats. So much easier to immediately identify one without having to go looking to find out who is online

 

[ynotdivein]

:woot: Tricia! Love you too!

 

[uklaw]

I would just like to preface my first question with this comment. I am glad that you have, appropriately, commented in the past that the important question is not whether or not Casey Anthony is guilty but what crime she is guilty of (if any)? You have also stated that, for the purposes of the trial, what is important is what the state can prove and that in this sense their is a difference between a person being “not guilty” and “innocent”.

QUESTION 1: However, leaving that aside, what crime do you think (based upon the evidence you have seen) that Casey Anthony is an actual fact guilty of (regardless of whether or not the state can in fact prove it beyond a reasonable doubt).

I would be quite interested in your view on this since most of the commentators on shows like Nancy Grace lose credibility with me, often seem eccentric or have an agenda. Further, people on different forums tend to, understandably, get very emotional regarding this case.

SECOND QUESTION: Is there anything in the jury selection that could cause any conviction to be overturned on appeal?

I am, in particular thinking of the fact that Judge Perry did not allow the Defense to refrain from exercising their Peremptory Challenges until they had conducted voir dire with all of the venirepeople. I also understand that Florida provides greater protection with respect to peremptory challenges that the US Constitution does and that the US Supreme Court’s decision in Rivera v. Illinois (Provided that all jurors seated in a criminal case are qualified and unbiased, the Due Process Clause does not require automatic reversal of a conviction because of the trial court’s good-faith error in denying the defendant’s peremptory challenge to a juror) would be of no assistance to the state in Floridian proceedings.