- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
- Messages
- 2,793
- Reaction score
- 1,669
As it has been said,the lack of compassion & anxiety for the missing stepson shows...".there is ICE in them there veins!! I care only for my own feelings."
The problem I have with the argument that her e-mail is about establishing alibis is that LE was interviewing her with that as their primary goal, and not once, not twice, not three times, not four times, but going on five times in the span of two days. If LE is having her go over and over and over her day, then of course she's going to be obsessed with it, she's going to know it inside and out, she's going to be increasingly focused on times, where she was, what she did, and not necessarily because she's guilty, but because LE is drilling her and drilling her and drilling her about where she was that morning. It's going to be at the forefront of her mind because she's being rigorously and repeatedly questioned about it. In these edited e-mails, she may not be directly expressing concern for Kyron, but ultimately, that could be the root of her frustration along with having a negative reaction to indirect suspicion (at that time) that she may have been involved in Kyron's disappearance.
Also, Kaine and Desiree, especially Desiree, have said that obviously Terri was a phenomenal actress prior to Kyron's disappearance. What happened? If she's a sociopath, if she's such a great actress, if she's adept at fooling everyone, then why did she suddenly lose that ability to continue being a great actress? If she's a sociopath, expertly picking up clues about how to behave, then how do you explain her problematic, self-destructive behavior in the aftermath of Kyron's disappearance?
cypress, TH's self destructive behavior began months before Kyron went missing if we are to be believe the MFH took place. Desiree and Kaine not knowing that TH had plotted this until AFTER Kyron went missing explains why they think she was a phenomenal actress prior to Kyron's disappearance.
TH suddenly lost that ability because LE turned their focus on her (based on her own behaviors) prior to AND after Kyron's disappearance. That's why she lawyered up and stopped talking. She couldn't fool anyone anymore. IMHO.
But we DON'T know that the MFH took place. We DON'T know if Terri plotted this, and we DON'T know if she was acting prior to his disappearance. She lawyered up because people were accusing her of attempted murder and kidnapping. I'd have gotten a lawyer, too! Who has she attempted to fool? She hasn't said much since June 5 when she was giving a friend of hers a timeline in an email.
The problem I have with the argument that her e-mail is about establishing alibis is that LE was interviewing her with that as their primary goal, and not once, not twice, not three times, not four times, but going on five times in the span of two days. If LE is having her go over and over and over her day, then of course she's going to be obsessed with it, she's going to know it inside and out, she's going to be increasingly focused on times, where she was, what she did, and not necessarily because she's guilty, but because LE is drilling her and drilling her and drilling her about where she was that morning. It's going to be at the forefront of her mind because she's being rigorously and repeatedly questioned about it. In these edited e-mails, she may not be directly expressing concern for Kyron, but ultimately, that could be the root of her frustration along with having a negative reaction to indirect suspicion (at that time) that she may have been involved in Kyron's disappearance.
Also, Kaine and Desiree, especially Desiree, have said that obviously Terri was a phenomenal actress prior to Kyron's disappearance. What happened? If she's a sociopath, if she's such a great actress, if she's adept at fooling everyone, then why did she suddenly lose that ability to continue being a great actress? If she's a sociopath, expertly picking up clues about how to behave, then how do you explain her problematic, self-destructive behavior in the aftermath of Kyron's disappearance?
I have another concern I need to express. Hopefully, this is the right thread to address this, since the info is from her emails.
Here's Terri, with a baby who's feeling bad enough for her to go to two different stores looking for a particular medication.
Yet, what does she do afterward? Does she try a third store, maybe a regular drugstore, or something other than Fred Myers, to locate the much desired medication? Or does she go home, so she can sooth the baby in their own environment?
No, after a period of driving around, (a few minutes or an hour or more?) she takes the baby to a gym.
Would you take a fussy, uncomfortable baby to a gym? Even if the baby wasn't really ill, as in running a fever, would you be able to concentrate on exercising for a whole hour if your baby was being fussy?
This doesn't ring true for me. Even with knowing that driving can indeed sooth a baby (I know, I remember, I raised three children), the "fact" is, according to Terri, is that it didn't work this time. So why not go home then? Why at that point take this unhappy baby - who you were trying to find meds for - to a noisy GYM for a whole hour?
The feeling I get from her email is that the sole purpose of her activities (at least the ones she tells about) was to establish alibis for her day. That's really the way I see it.
If some other emails surface that show another side to her feelings on that day after Kyron disappeared, I'll be open to revising my opinion. But that won't change the fact that I think taking an unhappy baby to a gym for an hour is a normal thing to do.
You exercise buffs can correct me if I'm wrong.
But we DON'T know that the MFH took place. We DON'T know if Terri plotted this, and we DON'T know if she was acting prior to his disappearance. She lawyered up because people were accusing her of attempted murder and kidnapping. I'd have gotten a lawyer, too! Who has she attempted to fool? She hasn't said much since June 5 when she was giving a friend of hers a timeline in an email.
Agree. And, investigators say the "plot never went beyond talk", which makes me question the validity of any "plot"...
http://www.portlandtribune.com/news/story_2nd.php?story_id=128293469651541900
BBM
I think one of the other big things that she originally said that was refuted later by DY, was how DY and TH met and when TH began caring for Kyron.
Is the "90 minute ride" supposed to have been right after leaving the school?
Is it supposed to be on Sauvie Island? TIA!
I respectfully disagree with that we cannot extrapolate anything from her emails. I find that there are several things quite pertinent to the case that can be extrapolated that do not hinge on if they were edited, taken out of context, nor does it matter what was asked or stated in previous or following emails to these in question.
First email in question~begin~
![]()
We learn straight from the horse's mouth exactly when the "mix up", "mess up", "confusion"[as described by Terri]occurred, the morning of the 4th.
(whereas before this email it had been speculated as occurring on both Thurs. and Friday the 4th)
We learn that there was a chaperone list that day. We also learn that there were no males signed in on that list that day, yet Kyron was seen[after Terri had already left from the school property] with a .
man[assumed to have been chaperone] and 2 girls.
(Though we DO NOT KNOW who relayed this specific info to Terri[maybe that part was edited out])
We learn from Terri that she left the school at 9 a.m.
(Though I am only extrapolating the info gleaned from this first of four emails, she does however follow up this statement with she has a time stamped receipt for exactly 912 a.m. exactly 7 miles away, in one of the the 3 remaining emails)
This is just a very few important and very pertinent details that we can extrapolate from the emails and as I said this info is not affected by in or out of context, edited portions, or whether a question or statement was preceded or was followed by these 4 emails..
I agree with you debs, we DON'T know that the MFH took place. I wouldn't be typing about a MFH plot if it hadn't been reported. Who hires someone to kill their spouse?!? People do, but divorce seems more logical to me.
That Kaine requested a RO using this information provided to him (seemingly) by LE, and that a judge granted the RO...And that TH hasn't seen baby k since the end of June, I have to assume that the MFH plot is a very real probability.
I'm only basing my opinion on what's been reported in MSM. The only source I have to formulate an opinion since I'm not related to the case and live several states away.
It's all just my own speculation based on what I've read.
I'm sorry but I respectfully disagree. I put myself in the position of the one whom the "talks" had as the target.(which would be Kaine). I put myself in his position. Then I think about the "talks" that took place with me as the "target" of these "talks". Then it is more than apparent there was a MFH plot.
There are"talks" between two people(with one of those two being my spouse). MY spouse "discussing" the matter of having the target(which would be me) killed by the person other than my spouse. "Talks" that included IMO an amount of what it would cost(either an amt given by the person which has been asked my spouse to kill me) or (an amt offered by my spouse to the person whom they are "talking" with about murdering me).
The one tiny paragraph above is more than enough for the vast majority of human beings that I know to not only be extremely disturbed about but way more than enough for me to say there was a murder for hire plot discussed by my spouse about having me killed.
Is that above enough to have someone charged with MFH, NO. But no one has been charged with MFH.(But is skating on razor thin ice of meeting "conspiracy" to commit MFH)
But I am only speaking with regards to the question of is there enough to say there was a plot?
And yes, just as it has been called a "plot" since the first week of July when this news broke there was such. It is a MFH plot and just from tiny, tiny bit we know, more than qualifies as a MFH plot
Just wondering, if TH divorced KH, as far as custody of Kyron goes, her being step mother, she would have none, is that correct?
If, KH demised, would TH have custody or would Kyron be immediately sent to his mother DY?
Probably should be asking this in the legal thread, but the answer may just possibly have to do with why not just divorce KH.
Anyone know the answer to this?
Just wondering, if TH divorced KH, as far as custody of Kyron goes, her being step mother, she would have none, is that correct?
If, KH demised, would TH have custody or would Kyron be immediately sent to his mother DY?
Probably should be asking this in the legal thread, but the answer may just possibly have to do with why not just divorce KH.
Anyone know the answer to this?