Timeline of Events

What the heck does any of this stuff about Echols' address have anything to do with a timeline? I'll do you a favor kyleb and others who are hung up about the address. I'll start a new thread there and it can be discussed to your heart's content.
 
Well then please let me refresh your memory with some examples from this thread when I brought up the fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders:











And here's one particularly notable example among many from previous threads:



Now again, surely you can see understand why I'm in no hurry to finish condensing the body of evidence down to timeline format here until those who've been requesting it can bring themselves to acknowledge the simple and well documented fact that Echols lies about where lived at the time of the murders?

It looked to me like most of those posts weren't denying that he lied about where he lived, except CR's posts, and of course my own post, but we've already established that I was groggy and looking at the wrong file, which I quickly acknowledged when you pointed it out to me. Anyway, I'm not entirely convinced of the impossibility that her explanation is valid. And no, I'm not unconvinced because I wish to believe he is telling the truth, so please don't suggest that as I've seen you do to others. Perhaps you and CR can further discuss it in the new Echols' address thread if you're both willing. Honestly, I don't fully understand your reluctance. It seems almost equally time consuming to keep bringing up this issue as it would be to post a timeline, but if you don't feel like doing it, well then you don't have to.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Anyway, I'm not entirely convinced of the impossibility that her explanation is valid. And no, I'm not unconvinced because I wish to believe he is telling the truth, so please don't suggest that as I've seen you do to others.
So what does compel you to give weight to CR's explanation which she's provided absolutely no evidence to support?
 
So what does compel you to give weight to CR's explanation which she's provided absolutely no evidence to support?

I wouldn't say I'm compelled to give CR's explanation weight. You're correct in that I've seen no evidence to support her explanation, but I never said I believed it to be an established fact. I only said I didn't think it impossible that it could be valid. The situation she described doesn't sound impossible to me because I am currently in a split living situation. I spend much of my time here in this small town taking care of my parents and have this address on my license, although my name is on a lease the city relatively nearby. But nobody signed up to hear about me. The similarities between my situation and the one she described are not enough to convince me that her explanation is true. I am not offering up my experiences as evidence to back her assertion. I'm not as concerned about it as you are, though. Maybe you should ask her for evidence. I'm finding this back and forth on this topic to be increasingly tiresome. But I would like to see you post a timeline once you find a way to resolve this issue.

CR-Sorry for talking about you like you're not here!

Edited to add: I tried to post this in the Echol's address thread. I'm not sure how it ended up here. A sign that I should go to bed. Apologies for furthering the derailment of the long awaited timeline.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'm finding this back and forth on this topic to be increasingly tiresome.
Well you're free to come to terms with [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9999749&postcount=93"]the evidence I've previously presented in this thread[/ame] which proves CR's explanation false beyond any reasonable doubt, at which point you could help others do the same, and then I'll finish that long awaited timeline which anyone who actually cared to familiarize themselves with the body of evidence in this case could've made for themselves at any point across the past two decades. But again, as long as you all refuse to acknowledge the simple and well documented fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders, I'm in no hurry to finish the timeline.
 
Well you're free to come to terms with the evidence I've previously presented in this thread which proves CR's explanation false beyond any reasonable doubt, at which point you could help others do the same, and then I'll finish that long awaited timeline which anyone who actually cared to familiarize themselves with the body of evidence in this case could've made for themselves at any point across the past two decades. But again, as long as you all refuse to acknowledge simple and well documented fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders, I'm in no hurry to finish the timeline.

I have no motivation to come to terms with anything you've presented on that topic as I've never denied that Echols' lied about where he lived. Your issue is with other people. I won't be helping anyone come to terms with it either. As I've said, I'm not as concerned with this topic. If your aim is to sway the opinions of others on this board, you might consider trying a different approach. And now I am going to try a different approach and discontinue engaging you any further with regard to Echols' address at the time of the murders, and timelines, for that matter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders is obviously an issue for those who refuse acknowledge it, particularly those of you who falsely accuse me of dishonesty for pointing out as much.
 
The fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders is obviously an issue for those who refuse acknowledge it, particularly those of you who falsely accuse me of dishonesty for pointing out as much.

There's a thread for it now. You can carry it over there.
 
The fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders is obviously an issue for those who refuse acknowledge it, particularly those of you who falsely accuse me of dishonesty for pointing out as much.

He keeps repeating the same lie over and over to his supporters. He has no respect for his supporters and maybe he considers them to be the 'sheep' he has spoken about before.
 
How does lying about one's address make one a murderer? I believe that's the real issue here. If lying about one's address makes one a murderer, then I fear that there are a lot of undiscovered murderers out there! I constantly get mail addressed to people who don't live at my residence, although the address on the envelope is correct. Sometimes people lie about their address just so they'll be left alone! I'm not saying it's right, but it happens!

I'm also not saying that Damien was trying to be left alone when he said what he did on the Larry King show (or whatever show it was that has someone's knickers in a knot). I think Damien was simply pointing out that he was, more or less, living in two places at the time. Both of them had West Memphis postal addresses, but one of them, his girlfriend's place, was really closer to being in Marion. He was simply trying to make everything plain. I understand because I live in a part of a large city that is not really in the incorporated portion of the large city, but my postal address uses the large city name. However, to anyone from the area, I can tell them the name of my small community, and they know where I am!

Let me make it a bit plainer. I lived in Houston, TX for 32 years. There are several unincorporated communities within Houston that receive mail at a Houston address but are actually located in places like University Village or Spring Branch, which are separate municipalities in their own right. To people in Houston, saying you live in University Village (the Village for short) or Spring Branch tells them exactly where you live. However, the mail for those places goes to a Houston, TX address. So, sometimes giving an address isn't always the best way of detailing the exact location of a dwelling. Sometimes it's necessary to explain a bit further, and that's not lying! Get it?

Now, can we please stop this nonsense about Damien's address?
 
He keeps repeating the same lie over and over to his supporters. He has no respect for his supporters and maybe he considers them to be the 'sheep' he has spoken about before.

Hey at least he seems to have dropped the silly 'rape on death row' allegations! Perhaps we should be grateful for small mercies?
 
How convenient and yes, I was surprised when I saw how close it was, yet he tried to claim he didn't know the area. He is a terrible liar isn't he?
 
How convenient and yes, I was surprised when I saw how close it was, yet he tried to claim he didn't know the area. He is a terrible liar isn't he?

Yes he is and so is Baldwin. It doesn't seem to bother either one. It's as though they are acting a part in a movie, oh, but they are aren't they? I guess they consider it their 'new job' title, Liars.
 
I'd truly like to see a timeline of events showing how and when this crime occurred from a non's perspective. I'm not directing this request at anyone in particular and any non who doesn't want to do so doesn't have to hurl unsupportable insults at me. Simply ignore the request. IIA

I would not hold your breath CR.
 
:stop:


[ame="http://websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=159"]The Rules - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
161
Guests online
968
Total visitors
1,129

Forum statistics

Threads
626,640
Messages
18,530,186
Members
241,106
Latest member
BuffaloBen1781
Back
Top