What the heck does any of this stuff about Echols' address have anything to do with a timeline? I'll do you a favor kyleb and others who are hung up about the address. I'll start a new thread there and it can be discussed to your heart's content.
Well then please let me refresh your memory with some examples from this thread when I brought up the fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders:
And here's one particularly notable example among many from previous threads:
Now again, surely you can see understand why I'm in no hurry to finish condensing the body of evidence down to timeline format here until those who've been requesting it can bring themselves to acknowledge the simple and well documented fact that Echols lies about where lived at the time of the murders?
So what does compel you to give weight to CR's explanation which she's provided absolutely no evidence to support?Anyway, I'm not entirely convinced of the impossibility that her explanation is valid. And no, I'm not unconvinced because I wish to believe he is telling the truth, so please don't suggest that as I've seen you do to others.
So what does compel you to give weight to CR's explanation which she's provided absolutely no evidence to support?
Well you're free to come to terms with [ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9999749&postcount=93"]the evidence I've previously presented in this thread[/ame] which proves CR's explanation false beyond any reasonable doubt, at which point you could help others do the same, and then I'll finish that long awaited timeline which anyone who actually cared to familiarize themselves with the body of evidence in this case could've made for themselves at any point across the past two decades. But again, as long as you all refuse to acknowledge the simple and well documented fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders, I'm in no hurry to finish the timeline.I'm finding this back and forth on this topic to be increasingly tiresome.
Well you're free to come to terms with the evidence I've previously presented in this thread which proves CR's explanation false beyond any reasonable doubt, at which point you could help others do the same, and then I'll finish that long awaited timeline which anyone who actually cared to familiarize themselves with the body of evidence in this case could've made for themselves at any point across the past two decades. But again, as long as you all refuse to acknowledge simple and well documented fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders, I'm in no hurry to finish the timeline.
The fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders is obviously an issue for those who refuse acknowledge it, particularly those of you who falsely accuse me of dishonesty for pointing out as much.
The fact that Echols lies about where he lived at the time of the murders is obviously an issue for those who refuse acknowledge it, particularly those of you who falsely accuse me of dishonesty for pointing out as much.
He keeps repeating the same lie over and over to his supporters. He has no respect for his supporters and maybe he considers them to be the 'sheep' he has spoken about before.
How convenient and yes, I was surprised when I saw how close it was, yet he tried to claim he didn't know the area. He is a terrible liar isn't he?
I'd truly like to see a timeline of events showing how and when this crime occurred from a non's perspective. I'm not directing this request at anyone in particular and any non who doesn't want to do so doesn't have to hurl unsupportable insults at me. Simply ignore the request. IIA
I also would love to see some sort of timeline, but the thread keeps getting derailed due to off-topic posts. :banghead:I would not hold your breath CR.