Q: Any doubt she was the driver or in the car alone?
A: There's no evidence otherwise.
The airbags are ineffective without the seatbelt, he says.
(I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm having trouble breathing just reading this :furious: )
Q: If she had her seatbelt on would it have changed the outcome?
A: We didn't have enough evidence.
We never asked the manufacturer for help, he says. There's certain data that only the manufacturer can read from the EDR and they won't let us read it, he says. I'm not going to waste time by asking because I've asked before, he says.
:banghead:
There was an envelope with Arlene's name on it with $80 cash, and we gave it to her, they said.
There was no letter in the envelope, the detective says.
"It was 155 feet from the rock to the final rest of the Jeep, it was a pretty significant impact."
It took a front impact, which deployed the airbags, rolled to the rear, which wanted to deploy the airbags.
The interior of the Jeep itself held up pretty well, he says.
These three impacts were not survivable, I think, he says.
We work everything backwards, which is opposite of what everyone else does, he says.
We couldn't realistically animate this crash, because of the lack of evidence, he says.
By 5p.m. that afternoon the tire marks on the road would have been gone he says, because of the low speed of the crash.
:waitasec: