BBM
Hi Snow ... If I may ask ...What article(s) are you referring to with regard to a "sighting at Lowe's"?:waitasec:
WHOA!! Could this be the RUMOR of ACE Hardware (on the mountain), not Lowe's unless something else is out there, but I doubt it.
BBM
Hi Snow ... If I may ask ...What article(s) are you referring to with regard to a "sighting at Lowe's"?:waitasec:
Did this aerial search take place? I don't recall seeing anything about an aerial search.
What does this mean? Posted yesterday by the same reporter who took the pics of that Jeep.
newsken Ken Nicholson
Good thing I didn't dismiss the #GailPalmgren flyer when we first received it. #CHAnews
about 19 hours ago
http://twitter.com/#!/newsken/statuses/84355400266285057
If there was any truth in the sighting of Gail at Lowes, then maybe she was getting new door locks to change them out since Matt told her he was filing for a legal separation and somebody abducted her at Lowes? Just a thought.
I honestly doubt they would have announced an aerial search. It could have easily happened without anyone knowing about it since helicopters go over the county all the time.
But you are also correct that unless the Jeep is out in the open somewhere, they aren't going to find it this time of year. Too much foliage.
WHOA!! Could this be the RUMOR of ACE Hardware (on the mountain), not Lowe's unless something else is out there, but I doubt it.
I may be reading what you said wrong, and if so, I apologize. The plan for the search was announced (link here) but there was no follow up on that as far as we know.
These recent posts from people who know the area are enlightening, but it is a little disheartening that there are so many places to stash that Jeep, especially in the summer. I just have a feeling that nothing real is going to happen with this case until the Jeep or Gail are found.![]()
Holy guacamole, that's terrible. See, this is part of the reason why I am not all that concerned about Arlene not being given a direct pipeline to LE. If she doesn't realize Gmail is nothing but web based email, then how accurate is her statement that Matt was using tracking devices? And SMM didn't even question that or clarify it, am I correct?
Just an insight into the Chattanooga area: If you research, you will find that Chattanooga and the surrounding area has a high crime rate considering the population. However, the crime is generally located in specific downtown areas and usually involves robberies, shootings and stabbings that are mostly gang/drug or domestic related. As a matter of fact, we have had very high homicide/violent crime rates this year. But, stranger abduction/carjacking crime is very low here. While it is certainly possible that she may have been abducted by a stranger, the probability is very low in this area. IMO.
You are right it was ACE Hardware. My mistake. Thank you for correcting me.
I am very suspicious that the text AD received came from LE. First of all, do the police routinely text someone in an important matter, such as this? If a member of LE believes that a person is interfering in an investigation to the point of loosely threatening to have them arrested, would they text that? I would think that their first choice would be a face to face meeting and if the person was not available for that, they would call, at least. I imagine they would want to properly identify themselves and make their point very clear. I believe even if they didn't get an answer, they would leave a message and ask for a call back. I am pretty sure that if AD received a VM message asking her to call LE, she would do that very quickly. I have also seen many "anonymous" people out there with fake profiles and let's just say, sensitive to the innocence of MP, making very harsh and threatening statements online directed at AD and others in the community that are asking questions and trying to help. In my opinion, it is more likely one of these persons sent that text. Has a member of LE admitted to sending that text?
Holy guacamole, that's terrible. See, this is part of the reason why I am not all that concerned about Arlene not being given a direct pipeline to LE. If she doesn't realize Gmail is nothing but web based email, then how accurate is her statement that Matt was using tracking devices? And SMM didn't even question that or clarify it, am I correct?
snipped...
I can only speak for myself, but I'm not upset about it because LE took some stuff from her, just not all. Also, we don't know what she has, it may not be pertinent. And we don't really know the extent of this "ignoring" of AD. She wants LE to stay in touch with her and believe everything she says, but hasn't said a thing as far as I know about LE talking to family. IMVHO, the family should come first before friends, and since we know Diane already said LE told her they couldn't say anything because it might compromise the case, well the same goes for Arlene whether she likes it or not.
It's possible that LE is really dropping the ball on this, but it's also possible that LE knows what it's doing. We don't have enough info to really judge.
IMHO, I believed that she was referring to GP's gmail account e-mail that was being forwarded to MP, which is relatively easy to set up. It's used a lot for organizations to monitor company e-mail's, too. :twocents:
Arlene has strong credibility in my eyes, because of the number of things she's said that have been corroborated by other stories.
SMM's credibility is shot in my book.
Doing more research, but here is what I have so far...please remember that AD is not an "internet techy", so she may have used the wrong name for the software in her interview. Gail had an aol.com email accountHoly guacamole, that's terrible. See, this is part of the reason why I am not all that concerned about Arlene not being given a direct pipeline to LE. If she doesn't realize Gmail is nothing but web based email, then how accurate is her statement that Matt was using tracking devices? And SMM didn't even question that or clarify it, am I correct?