Deceased/Not Found TN - Joseph "Joe Clyde" Daniels, 5, Dickson, 3 Apr 2018 *autistic* *PLEA: No Contest* *appeal filed 2023* #3

[Allabouttrial]

Nick is live on Newschannel 5 FB taking questions.
BTW I really appreciate all of you who are posting regular updates, duplicate or not

 

[Jewels53]

If you want - I can keep an eye out on the posts tweets - and you can run to the store. Just let me know when you leave - unless you think they will have a verdict today....

I am afraid if I leave they will have a verdict. If I decide to go I will go at their lunch time.

 

[angelainwi]

I am afraid if I leave they will have a verdict. If I decide to go I will go at their lunch time.

A woman after my own heart, trying to schedule her day around a trial. My husband thinks I am nutso

 

[Niner]

I am afraid if I leave they will have a verdict. If I decide to go I will go at their lunch time.

Okay - sounds good to me! When you leave - just tag me - and I'll keep an eye out - JUST in case they "work" during lunch....

 

[Jewels53]

@Niner

I am going to leave. If they come back with a Verdict tag me please. You know if I leave they will come back.

Thank You!

 

[Allabouttrial]

src="

"

Live L&C Verdict watch

 

[Niner]

@Niner

I am going to leave. If they come back with a Verdict tag me please. You know if I leave they will come back.

Thank You!

Okay will do -

 

[Niner]

Well - after announcing that the jurors had a question - no word for an hour now....

 

[Allabouttrial]

Well - after announcing that the jurors had a question - no word for an hour now....

Nick Beres said it was a mistake there was no question.

 

[Allabouttrial]

Question for everyone... If you were a juror would there be enough reasonable doubt for you? Personally taking emotions out of it I'd be very conflicted.

 

[Niner]

Nick Beres said it was a mistake there was no question.

Ah! Thanks - I keep refresh her page - and nothing... I'd reply to her to tell her to keep us updated - even if she did make a mistake, but I don't do tweeter....

 

[Allabouttrial]

Ah! Thanks - I keep refresh her page - and nothing... I'd reply to her to tell her to keep us updated - even if she did make a mistake, but I don't do tweeter....

 

[geevee]

Question for everyone... If you were a juror would there be enough reasonable doubt for you? Personally taking emotions out of it I'd be very conflicted.

Yes I have tons of reasonable doubt and would vote NG. No vehicle ever left the house that night, nearly everything in his 'confession' was shown to be untrue (or 'speculation', as he phrased it), and it became clear why they put Alex and his video interviews on - only so they could get in Joe's interrogation.

Someone let the boy out of the house that night, but I don't believe they proved it was Joe. And yeah, I do think his 'confession' was coerced. Did they ever say how long in total that lasted? I heard the video was about 4 hours before they cut it down to the 2 3/4 shown, but how long did they interrogate him altogether? It surely looks like a lot longer than 4 hours.

 

[dixiegirl1035]

Yes I have tons of reasonable doubt and would vote NG. No vehicle ever left the house that night, nearly everything in his 'confession' was shown to be untrue (or 'speculation', as he phrased it), and it became clear why they put Alex and his video interviews on - only so they could get in Joe's interrogation.

Someone let the boy out of the house that night, but I don't believe they proved it was Joe. And yeah, I do think his 'confession' was coerced. Did they ever say how long in total that lasted? I heard the video was about 4 hours before they cut it down to the 2 3/4 shown, but how long did they interrogate him altogether? It surely looks like a lot longer than 4 hours.

Interesting that your conviction is that someone let him out of the house.

Does that in turn lead me to believe that you agree with some of the story that leads up to "someone LET HIM out of the house"?

I still to this day don't understand the coercion that some are stating. Can folks point me to where there was force? threats?... or do some here think that "threats=coercision" in that if you lie, you will have problems etc... a la (DBM as would be O/T to compare to another case)

 

[geevee]

Interesting that your conviction is that someone let him out of the house.

Does that in turn lead me to believe that you agree with some of the story that leads up to "someone LET HIM out of the house"?

I still to this day don't understand the coercion that some are stating. Can folks point me to where there was force? threats?... or do some here think that "threats=coercision" in that if you lie, you will have problems etc... a la (DBM as would be O/T to compare to another case)

I say 'let him out of the house' because of the sighting of little Joe (or someone wearing the pajamas he had on) by a witness that night, and no evidence that anything happened in the house that night.

I think the coercion is fairly evident, they refused to believe anything he said (or stop the interrogation) until he said what they wanted to hear - that he did 'something' to little Joe. He had only two choices - he was either the guy who liked to cause kids pain or the one who caused an 'accident' to happen to little Joe, but it was very clear he was only leaving that room by telling them one or the other of those. And there is zero evidence he did anything to little Joe.

 

[geevee]

^^^ Just my opinions.

 

[geevee]

We have a verdict!!

 

[Jewels53]

@Niner I made it back! Just in time!

 

[Jewels53]

[URL='https://twitter.com/cathyrusson']Cathy Russon[URL='https://twitter.com/cathyrusson']@cathyrusson[/URL][/URL]

#JosephDaniels - NOT GUILTY of 1st-Degree murder. GUILTY of 2nd-degree murder.
@LawCrimeNetwork

11:50 AM · Jun 12, 2021

 

[SA55]

well, they would have removed me from the court room. Judge asked anyone that could not control their emotions to leave the room. I may be home alone, but I had a very audible response once the verdict was read. Actually clamped my hand over my mouth.