What else happened on that case though?So did the perp in Amber's case. CA to TX = several state lines.
http://www.bakersfield.com/news/bre...cle_84aba3bf-b9a1-538d-bb13-851d1d1aeca0.html
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
What else happened on that case though?So did the perp in Amber's case. CA to TX = several state lines.
http://www.bakersfield.com/news/bre...cle_84aba3bf-b9a1-538d-bb13-851d1d1aeca0.html
They are calling her a teen runaway in that article. They have already said ET was kidnapped.So did the perp in Amber's case. CA to TX = several state lines.
http://www.bakersfield.com/news/bre...cle_84aba3bf-b9a1-538d-bb13-851d1d1aeca0.html
What else happened on that case though?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
There had to be a major deal if they charged him with aggravated kidnapping.He cut a deal it appears but I'm still looking. He was polish and they didn't know his real name so he cut a deal or something to that effect.
What else happened on that case though?
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
http://www.bakersfield.com/news/bre...cle_84aba3bf-b9a1-538d-bb13-851d1d1aeca0.html
^ Proof that I don't make this stuff up.
Amber was 16 and "Max" (Maciej) 48 and she went with him from Bakersfield, CA to TX. Now, there were extenuating circumstances, such as her refusal to testify against him. Still, prosecutors dropped ELEVEN felony counts against him.
Shocking, eh?
My guess is that other case is very much the exception.There were extenuating circumstances, the most serious of which was that she refused to testify against him.
I sincerely hope that your estimate is more accurate, but I was blown away after a poster suggested that I look at Amber's case. I am still :jawdrop:
The US Code for Federal Kidnapping.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1201![]()
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
My guess is that other case is very much the exception.
They have proof TC groomed her in the emails.
Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk
Well they found something that caused them to charge him with aggravated kidnapping like 5 days after.As much as some believe otherwise, I don't believe it has been established that he kidnapped her. I'm pretty sure they will decide on the charges after she is recovered, and gives a statement. Not before.
As much as some believe otherwise, I don't believe it has been established that he kidnapped her. I'm pretty sure they will decide on the charges after she is recovered, and gives a statement. Not before.
As much as some believe otherwise, I don't believe it has been established that he kidnapped her. I'm pretty sure they will decide on the charges after she is recovered, and gives a statement. Not before.
This man really has nothing left to live for. This is getting scarier by the minute.
He's got plenty to live for. He cannot leave his children and grandchildren with a legacy of abducting a 15 year old, holding her against her will and then taking his life. He's got children, grandchildren and a woman who gave him 31 years of her life, and friends and a community who he needs to make atonement to. He's got a child with him that he owes the chance for full life. He's got lots to live for and plenty of opportunity to do the right thing after all the wrong things he's done.
I'm sorry I just don't see it that way.
They are calling her a teen runaway in that article. They have already said ET was kidnapped.
They do have witness statements saying she was afraid of this guy, the driver taking her to Shoneys said she was hesitant, her sister said ET said to call the cops if she wasn't home by 6, coworkers saying she would tell them to tell TC she was not there when he came to see her at work.
I think theres at least initial evidence to suggest he had undue influence over her.
I look at this way: If he's reading here, which one do I want him to read?
She's 15, I would think that seals the deal!
The other girl was 16. They still have to prove she was kidnapped. That will be very difficult, with the video of the two of them walking around Walmart together. I can't see any reason the case will not be plea bargained the same way.
But he has been charged with aggravated kidnapping.That has not been established, and I don't think it's collaborated by the Walmart video. I'm sure the charges will be decided after TC is arrested, not before. The two cases are very similar.
I look at this way: If he's reading here, which one do I want him to read?