They will bring Federal charges of transporting a minor over state lines for the purpose of sexual intercourse. 10 years minimum..
Intriguing. How would they bring those charges so quick without actually having some evidence to support it?
They will bring Federal charges of transporting a minor over state lines for the purpose of sexual intercourse. 10 years minimum..
Should MCETs name be changed to initials?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Let me clarify, cooperate with her family and those trying to help her heal.
Intriguing. How would they bring those charges so quick without actually having some evidence to support it?
IMO, they do have evidence. Remember, they have those email drafts, I'm guessing, much more that they have not revealed. I think they have pretty clear evidence of this.Intriguing. How would they bring those charges so quick without actually having some evidence to support it?
I beamed the biggest smile at this! And I adore this psychologist who is telling everyone the REALITY of the situation. She us an expert, hopefully people will listen to her, since clearly many people are having trouble with the common sense of this. Ugh.Per headline news, the sentence on the federal charge is 10 year to LIFE.
IMO, they do have evidence. Remember, they have those email drafts, I'm guessing, much more that they have not revealed. I think they have pretty clear evidence of this.
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
Perhaps the "romantic" emails is enough to at least bring those charges at least I would think so in one TC referred to a body part.
Semantics. I'm sure that I what he meant.:slapfight: :slapfight:
Brent Cooper 22nd District Attorney General said she was Unharmed. WTF!
:slapfight: :slapfight:
She is safe, but not unharmed sir. IMO
This issue of whether minors can/can not be forced to submit to medical tests is interesting, and confusing. I suspect that if not a rape kit she will still be subject to some other types of medical tests, whether she wants to or not...
Intriguing. How would they bring those charges so quick without actually having some evidence to support it?
But those would fall under the States charges, no? JMO
Intriguing. How would they bring those charges so quick without actually having some evidence to support it?
I'm thinking the store video in OKC that was never released, the items not mentioned, may suggest that TC purchased "preventative" methods too.
But they may be intentionally overlooking ?suspicious behavior and "relationships" in the name on non judgement and free living. This could be a place people like TC go to hide their activity, because questions aren't asked.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.