Pamela_Brewer
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
- Messages
- 2,217
- Reaction score
- 90
No! I did not see that.Did you look that persons IG account? Santa crapping on Jesus?? Disgusting. And they are both following the account.
Eww.
No! I did not see that.Did you look that persons IG account? Santa crapping on Jesus?? Disgusting. And they are both following the account.
Pretty sure that crimeonline link is not msm or a credible news source (and therefore probably against the rules here). Good lord...it reads like The National Enquirer.
:notgood:
This is good, hopefully it means that they are ok and reading on the internet.
MOO
Another example of fear and confusion: While Elizabeth was on her way to meet Cummins on March 13, the day she disappeared. We learned this morning that while a friend was driving her to a Shoneys restaurant, Elizabeth changed her mind at the last minute and asked to be taken back home. The friend apparently refused because she had to be to work. Elizabeth begged, please get me home. If only she had.
http://www.crimeonline.com/2017/03/27/lawyer-tennessee-kidnap-girl-didnt-want-to-go-with-pervy-teacher-forces-her-with-threats/
I believe there is a difference in "not allowed because it isn't a credible MSM source" and a "banned source".
I saw that I want to know why they eaven thought it was himNo! I did not see that.
Eww.
Have you reported it?This is good, hopefully it means that they are ok and reading on the internet.
MOO
"DA Cooper will be the one prosecuting the former teacher in this case. They have known each other since childhood."
*http://wkrn.com/2017/03/27/amber-alert-for-elizabeth-thomas-reaches-2-weeks/
I agree with you. However, it would be very helpful if we could confirm any of the details in this link.
MC Elizabeth's SISTER would you be able to confirm any of the details in the article that was posted earlier?
Here is the link: http://www.crimeonline.com/2017/03/...o-with-pervy-teacher-forces-her-with-threats/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just seems like a troll account to me.I saw that I want to know why they eaven thought it was him
Sent from my Z981 using Tapatalk
Did you look that persons IG account? Santa crapping on Jesus?? Disgusting. Only following them.
ETA: changed wording.
Then you didn't understand what I was saying. I don't think asterisks show up unless it is a particular banned site, not just one not allowed. There are hundreds of millions of non-MSM sites. Those can't all be banned.Yes, I agree. The whole point of my first post about this was in response to the poster who said they hoped that the source was within TOS. I said if it wasn't, there would be asterisks. Done.
Just seems like a troll account to me.
Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
You are correct. You can't edit your caption, you can delete and add a comment but it would reflect it in the comment section with new timestamp and not on top of all other comments.Are the new comments from TC or ET? Or are you saying a 3rd party is commenting that you think might be them?
Instagram didn't originally allow captions to be changed--only deleted. They could add a new comment to replace the old caption but, as I understand it, that comment would reflect a recent date. Unless something has changed since then.
I tried to change my captions and couldn't. But I could add more comments with different hashtags.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes. All of that is correct.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.