TN said that Misty will never tell what heppened to Haleigh. Why is she so sure?

[cyberborg]

My mother died in her bed. I could not bear to go back in that room, and we could not move fast enough. My grandmother was living with us when she died. I did not get another good night's sleep under that roof.

And since I believe that Ron believed MC's initial story...how could he move back into a place where his child was abducted? How could he take the chance on harm coming to his little boy as well?

BBM.

So Ron moved into a tent/trailer for a while and that was safer? :waitasec: Assuming that the MH was the crime scene?

At least Ron had checked all of the cupboards and hidy holes and ensured his drug stash was moved out ... :snooty:

 

[cyberborg]

em i always found it to be very suspicious that tn always wanted to be the one talking that was very clear, almost like she was afraid at the time to let rc or mc say a word,,imo

Yes ... Ron closely monitored and stage managed Misty and TN managed both Ron and Misty and ... I should imagine that GmaS managed them all.

IMO HaLeigh is safely buried somewhere and that is a true statement that Misty can make, Misty does not know where HaLeigh is or take LE to her -- and never will know.

 

[Emeralgem]

Yes ... Ron closely monitored and stage managed Misty and TN managed both Ron and Misty and ... I should imagine that GmaS managed them all.

IMO HaLeigh is safely buried somewhere and that is a true statement that Misty can make, Misty does not know where HaLeigh is or take LE to her -- and never will know.

I agree, but is LE refusing to believe she doesn't know where Haleigh is and just ignoring the fact the Cummings/Neves/Sykes clan are the ones who do know? JMHO

 

[justus4all]

Yes ... Ron closely monitored and stage managed Misty and TN managed both Ron and Misty and ... I should imagine that GmaS managed them all.

IMO HaLeigh is safely buried somewhere and that is a true statement that Misty can make, Misty does not know where HaLeigh is or take LE to her -- and never will know.

bolded/underlined by me...

IF TRUE....It could be somewhere that might not even be suspected.....

In the Caylee Anthony case, while searches for her were going on, a poster on WS suggested a place she may have been buried was in a cemetary..in a fresh grave that could easily be dug into...very shallow..until time passed and she could be quietly removed and placed in her "own" grave...

and it has made me think of the other day, on here, there were comments made that Ron (near Christmas day?) made a comment that he was going to go "talk" to Haleigh...(If memory serves it was TN that said that about Ron)..and some of the comments ..were..Now where would he go to do that?????..and some comments were..maybe to a cemetary...that's where folks go to be "close" to a lost love one...a quiet place to feel "close"...to "reconnect in spirit"...to feel a "peace"...

Anyone remember that???..A couple of days ago...

Anyone know of any cemetaries close to Ron's/MH..or..Putman county..

Just throwing thoughts around and IMO...

 

[cyberborg]

BBM

It wouldn't be like it's the first time that has happened...People cover for their kids all the time...so why is that so hard to believe? and IMO, it is allowed on here because it is an OPINION....based on what we have seen and heard from these two "unusual" people...we all have one....for that not to be allowed then neither should any other opinion...including those that support these two women...No opinions equal NO forum....I don't care who they're kin to....if there is a problem with the opinions expressed on this forum...well....it sounds personal...we're all here with opinions....and opinions only....you have yours....so why is it not ok for everyone else to have theirs? That doesn't seem fair...at all.....but hey...we don't own this forum...we simply provide input on this forum....until I hear something from the mods or the owner...I will continue to state my opinion as is.

I wonder if I started my own forum and told the members not to post any negative opinions..how well would that would work out? I bet that forum wouldn't reach 30,000 members like Websleuths.:woohoo:
We all know the TOS rules....but I don't recall the one that says no negative opinions and/or comments....

Just My OPINION of course.

To add to this....

It isn't just about 'opinion' but new developments, further research or analysis that bring forward new points, ideas and, thoughts.

This discussion is invaluable because WS'ers are going to assess the new post, debate it and either dismiss it, re-validate or, modify their opinion.

It never ceases to amaze me how posters either analyze something and come up with a new or different perspective or share a view that I may disagree with on the whole but there is some nugget that helps me or modifies my view slightly. It educates me or at least causes pause for thought. I try to be open and not dismissive. I do debate and play devil's advocate though.

The world would be boring if we all shared the same view/opinion and, to me, WS is a microcosm of the world. I applaud and welcome different views and opposing opinions because it helps me to review them and validate/evolve my 'belief'.

I am very open to being completely wrong in my analysis and opinion of the HaLeigh case because there are so few facts to base anything on ... it is all based on questionable sources, hearsay and outright lies that is secondhand or worse and has been filtered by some with agenda or bias.

We may all have a part of the story and we may all be wrong in some way since HaLeigh has not been found, a manner of death has not been identified and, a time of death has not been announced. We don't know ... yet.

Since we don't know I welcome every opinion, point, idea, thought because it is meant to contribute to the knowledgebase that we have created over the many months since this began. I'd hate for an opposing opinion not to be expressed or debated since it could be that comment way out in left field that breaks the case wide open ... something none of us have thought of before. It usually works that way.

Thank goodness for diversity in this world and in WS ... if not for that what would we have to talk about? Please feel free to disagree with me.

 

[justus4all]

To add to this....

It isn't just about 'opinion' but new developments, further research or analysis that bring forward new points, ideas and, thoughts.

This discussion is invaluable because WS'ers are going to assess the new post, debate it and either dismiss it, re-validate or, modify their opinion.

It never ceases to amaze me how posters either analyze something and come up with a new or different perspective or share a view that I may disagree with on the whole but there is some nugget that helps me or modifies my view slightly. It educates me or at least causes pause for thought. I try to be open and not dismissive. I do debate and play devil's advocate though.

The world would be boring if we all shared the same view/opinion and, to me, WS is a microcosm of the world. I applaud and welcome different views and opposing opinions because it helps me to review them and validate/evolve my 'belief'.

I am very open to being completely wrong in my analysis and opinion of the HaLeigh case because there are so few facts to base anything on ... it is all based on questionable sources, hearsay and outright lies that is secondhand or worse and has been filtered by some with agenda or bias.

We may all have a part of the story and we may all be wrong in some way since HaLeigh has not been found, a manner of death has not been identified and, a time of death has not been announced. We don't know ... yet.

Since we don't know I welcome every opinion, point, idea, thought because it is meant to contribute to the knowledgebase that we have created over the many months since this began. I'd hate for an opposing opinion not to be expressed or debated since it could be that comment way out in left field that breaks the case wide open ... something none of us have thought of before. It usually works that way.

Thank goodness for diversity in this world and in WS ... if not for that what would we have to talk about? Please feel free to disagree with me.

Very well said.....thanks so much..

 

[suspicious1]

To add to this....

It isn't just about 'opinion' but new developments, further research or analysis that bring forward new points, ideas and, thoughts.

This discussion is invaluable because WS'ers are going to assess the new post, debate it and either dismiss it, re-validate or, modify their opinion.

It never ceases to amaze me how posters either analyze something and come up with a new or different perspective or share a view that I may disagree with on the whole but there is some nugget that helps me or modifies my view slightly. It educates me or at least causes pause for thought. I try to be open and not dismissive. I do debate and play devil's advocate though.

The world would be boring if we all shared the same view/opinion and, to me, WS is a microcosm of the world. I applaud and welcome different views and opposing opinions because it helps me to review them and validate/evolve my 'belief'.

I am very open to being completely wrong in my analysis and opinion of the HaLeigh case because there are so few facts to base anything on ... it is all based on questionable sources, hearsay and outright lies that is secondhand or worse and has been filtered by some with agenda or bias.

We may all have a part of the story and we may all be wrong in some way since HaLeigh has not been found, a manner of death has not been identified and, a time of death has not been announced. We don't know ... yet.

Since we don't know I welcome every opinion, point, idea, thought because it is meant to contribute to the knowledgebase that we have created over the many months since this began. I'd hate for an opposing opinion not to be expressed or debated since it could be that comment way out in left field that breaks the case wide open ... something none of us have thought of before. It usually works that way.

Thank goodness for diversity in this world and in WS ... if not for that what would we have to talk about? Please feel free to disagree with me.

Well said, cyber....no one knows what really happened to Haleigh so all we have are our opinions....whether we agree or disagree...at the end of the day...we're all trying to find out what happened to this little girl...but to have someone come here and say that we have no right to state what we feel...well, let's just say...that offends me...in the worst way....I am very opinionated and have always been that way...and I have no problem none whatsoever telling others how I feel about a particular subject...that doesn't mean I am right...it just means that I believe what I believe....I respect everyone's opinion but I will not let someone tell me that what I believe or feel is "out of line" because it doesn't fall in line with how they feel or what they believe....

I'm glad to be here amongst some very intelligent people....and I must say that I learn something new here every single day.....whether it be pertaining to this case or just everyday life....I think I learned a little too much about aligators....LOL

you are a great poster, cyber....and I am proud to amongst the great...it is truly an honor....now let's find out what happened to Haleigh.

 

[suspicious1]

iirc, the change of heart started after the fight, ratgate, and then the tests and TN hiring Najame sp. They began throwing Misty under the bus then, but in their defense, the questions became clear, imo, that they suspected RC, thus the change of heart. imo it was the first time they knew that RC was being seen as the leader of the crime. jmo though.

ETA; that was also the time Misty started hanging out with Donna, so RC didn't have the control over her that he was used to, and imo, wanted.
The whole purpose of the divorce was to fuller squash misty under that bus....moo

Yosande, I was trying to find out who funded Misty's trip to Orlando in October....and it seems that Teresa's boyfriend did....so even though it seems they were revving up the bus prior to the trip...they were still trying to make Misty happy...therefore, funding her trip to Orlando.....wasn't it on that trip that Ron warned Misty that Donna was a snitch? It seems to me that the Cummings have been trying to keep Misty quiet and happy for a long time.

Ron and Jr was suppose to go on that trip with Misty but ended up not going...does anyone know why they didn't go?

 

[gypsy gal]

To answer the question posed in the title of this thread i think TN thinks misty is a liar and has lied many times in this case. That's it..no big conspiracy theory about Ronald or any of his family members.