Steelslady, I'm going backwards in the thread to try and catch up. I've never teetered about RP or BR and I don't identify with either status crowd.
BR exhibited general characteristics of an online predator to a tee. He sympathized, listened to her stores, her pain and despair and then very methodically used this same information to manipulate her into doing exactly what he wanted.... filming a rape of SP by her father. He knew she wasn't going to go to friends or LE...she was terrified of RP, she supposedly told CP too. He knew she felt suicidal and even over her repeated objections, he still pressed for what he WANTED not what he needed. <Could we ever imagine LE or any other adult telling a 14 year old to video her rape so they could proof??>
BR put those suggestions out there in order to gage a reaction from SP and to establish his "I'm a good guy, I want to help you" routine. A common pattern most sexual predators use in order to establish willingness, trust and complicity from their targeted victims.
Respectfully, if it indeed is proven that BR had sexual contact with SP, would that in any way change your opinion of BR and his good intentions?
We know and have no problem calling RP out on his criminal psychological and physical abuse of SP and rightly so. He's the worst of the worst. Unfortunately, he had unlimited access to SP right in their own home.
What I don't understand is the need to defend/justify the self admitted criminal acts by BR against SP as well?
https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-632111.pdf
Great study on online predators from 2008 done by American Psychological Association regarding the online approach to child, teen sexual abuse.
They specifically discuss the likelihood of an existing abused teen being even more susceptible to an online predator.