Found Safe TN - SLP, 14, Madisonville, Monroe County, 13 Jan 2019 #2 *ARREST*
- Thread starter cybervampira
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 12,093
- Reaction score
- 160,625
I believe that was definitely what happened. Is it for sure that whomever SP was staying with will face criminal charges? I've been offline mostly today.
WHY?! They should be honored! They "helped" her. What part of that is not understood?
Julia966
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2016
- Messages
- 644
- Reaction score
- 5,200
Dear Lord, this situation gets worse every time I look. Poor SP, the things she's had to endure, now videos and pics?!Her ability to escape the situation proves to me she is a fighter and that's a good indicator that she'll be able to recover going forward.
I still have a problem with a few 'stories' coming from RP and CP. Why would all the other children be in public school and SP enrolled, but then was homeschooled? There isn't one explanation that makes common sense IMO. Why would a 14 yo have 2 cell phones? That would be costly to maintain.
The audacity RP had in doing his 'pleas for SP to come home' made me sick at the time and now knowing for a fact of what he was doing just makes it 1000 times worse. He spoke of her almost romantically instead of father/daughter roles IMO. creeper
I'm not accusing Mom of anything, I'd just be interested in the dynamic within the home from her opinion. I also know that CPS would have spoken with all the other siblings. Another interesting perspective IMO.
I wonder if the second cell phone was SP's purchase of a burner phone. I have no idea, living out in the boonies, if she would be able to buy a phone. Or, perhaps it was bought for her. It does seem unlikely that the family would pay for two phones for her.
Julia966
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2016
- Messages
- 644
- Reaction score
- 5,200
A lot is not understood.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 12,093
- Reaction score
- 160,625
I READ other posts the commented on this possibility earlier in the thread. Was wondering if further criminal charges mentioned in PC meant whomever helped SP or who.
gngr~snap
Verified Pediatric Nurse Georgia
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Messages
- 14,380
- Reaction score
- 15,515
What is understood is what LE said, She is safe, warm healthy and eating!
Yes, very rarely is it a one time occurrence. Imo
A few posters explained that harboring a minor is illegal, regardless of the circumstances. At this point we don't even know what the circumstances were. Hopefully when we find out it will be understood. Imo
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Messages
- 6,951
- Reaction score
- 77,177
I still think it's possible that authorities knew early on that she was safe in Wisconsin, notwithstanding that they stated she had not yet been found. We all know that LE can mislead the media while they do in fact have more knowledge than they let on. They did also state SP was not endangered. Her rescuer(s) may have contacted LE or the FBI once SP was there, and it was kept quiet while they investigated evidence that would nail the 
step dad with a solid arrest . They may even have had the video and pics handed to them, or had been told about them by the rescuer or SP herself before it was announced they "found" those.
step dad with a solid arrest . They may even have had the video and pics handed to them, or had been told about them by the rescuer or SP herself before it was announced they "found" those.I agree!I still think it's possible that authorities knew early on that she was safe in Wisconsin, notwithstanding that they stated she had not yet been found. We all know that LE can mislead the media while they do in fact have more knowledge than they let on. They did also state SP was not endangered. Her rescuer(s) may have contacted LE or the FBI once SP was there, and it was kept quiet while they investigated evidence that would nail the
I hope not. But someone took her across state lines and harbored her while a manhunt was underway. I guess we'll need to hear more about the circumstances.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2018
- Messages
- 3,162
- Reaction score
- 29,309
Has it been mentioned whose family was in Wisconsin? Was it CP's? I know SP was not with them but it was mentioned several times.
gngr~snap
Verified Pediatric Nurse Georgia
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Messages
- 14,380
- Reaction score
- 15,515
"She lived in Lawrenceville for many years before moving to Tennessee in December."
It's being reported the move was 4 weeks before she ran away.
* you can skip the survey and still read.
Teen with Gwinnett ties found safe; adoptive father charged with rape
Moo
It's being reported the move was 4 weeks before she ran away.
* you can skip the survey and still read.
Teen with Gwinnett ties found safe; adoptive father charged with rape
Moo
LE would not leave the other kids in the house with that knowledge.I still think it's possible that authorities knew early on that she was safe in Wisconsin, notwithstanding that they stated she had not yet been found. We all know that LE can mislead the media while they do in fact have more knowledge than they let on. They did also state SP was not endangered. Her rescuer(s) may have contacted LE or the FBI once SP was there, and it was kept quiet while they investigated evidence that would nail the
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2018
- Messages
- 12,093
- Reaction score
- 160,625
ITA it always give me the creeps when I see the victim and perp side by side. MSM does it all the time just for the sensationalism I believe, they really went overboard with it in the Mollie Tibbetts case. I wish they would stop and think about the victims and their families first.
maybe they didn't.....
- Status
