So do you believe Caylee is still alive? And if so, what evidence leads you to believe that?
No, I don't believe she is still alive at all. Sorry, would take hours to list the evidence I feel supports my feelings, and I have class in an hour! haha
So do you believe Caylee is still alive? And if so, what evidence leads you to believe that?
Its already been stated here and on NG that evidence can not be used in court because it is a new technology and can have false positives. Do a search for it, Im not going to do your research for you.
If it can't be used in court, its not good enough for me. I need more proof before I write this child off as dead.
A bunch of people on a website who THINKS she is dead without evidence enough to bring charges on someone isn't enough to make me give up hope, sorry to say.
Its already been stated here and on NG that evidence can not be used in court because it is a new technology and can have false positives. Do a search for it, Im not going to do your research for you.
If it can't be used in court, its not good enough for me. I need more proof before I write this child off as dead.
A bunch of people on a website who THINKS she is dead without evidence enough to bring charges on someone isn't enough to make me give up hope, sorry to say.
So do you believe Caylee is still alive? And if so, what evidence leads you to believe that?
No, I don't believe she is still alive at all. Sorry, would take hours to list the evidence I feel supports my feelings, and I have class in an hour! haha
I havent had any sleep so I am not coming across correctly. I know it is admissible, but it can be argued. DNA can not.The evidence and expert testimony provided by the "Body Farm" forensic experts has never been successfully challenged in any court. I would not count on it not being accepted.
Her other boyfriend Tony has now been fired from the police force and several others have moved. Lots of people have been affected by this in a big way . . . oh, except Casey. She's just talking and smiling and acting like nothing happened, according to Leonard P. and Rob D.So Casey probably knew ABOUT her from a mutual friend and maybe knew the detail about her going to that apartment complex and was willing to drag her name into something as sinister as kidnapping a child just to be able to concoct a story. Casey has no qualms about taking all kinds of people down just to get what she wants. The behavior is just plain bizarre and outrageous. I've always felt that that didn't bode well for the fate of Caylee.
Its already been stated here and on NG that evidence can not be used in court because it is a new technology and can have false positives. Do a search for it, Im not going to do your research for you.
If it can't be used in court, its not good enough for me. I need more proof before I write this child off as dead.
A bunch of people on a website who THINKS she is dead without evidence enough to bring charges on someone isn't enough to make me give up hope, sorry to say.
The bottom line is if I had a toddler that I probably knew I should not have I sure as H*LL would be watching the news to see if they were coming to get me. The person that has Caylee knows they have her. They know where this whole thing is headed and I would bet that KC did not pay them enough money shut them up forever.
Okay well thank you for answering the question. Since you already believe Caylee is deceased then the O.P.'s question doesn't apply.
This is an international search. Highly visible case. You can't avoid this case if you tried!
The lack of concrete evidence. You mean like DNA?
The lack of evidcence that she can be arrested on. Again, you mean like DNA proving a decomposing body was in the trunk of Casey's car, that decomposing body left at least one hair that was identified through DNA to come from Caylee, and that DNA-identified hair has the banding that is scientific proof of having come from a decomposing body? You mean THAT kind of evidence?
The lack of evidence that can be used in court. See above. Forensic evidence is admissible in court, as are statements, testimony by cadaver dog handlers, witness testimony, etc, etc.
Oh yeah - the missing body, the missing murder weapon, the missing motive. There was no weapon found in the Scott Peterson case and the motive was speculation based on his comments to mistress Amber. The body washed ashore 4 months later and COD, TOD and place of the murder was never determined. He's sitting on death row anyway!
Wanting to party isnt a good enough motive. says who? Her grandparents would thave kept her. Wanting to be in power isn't enough to kill your child, imo. according to who?
It doesn't matter who is right. All that matters is that she needs to be brought home, dead or alive, and people keep forgetting that. No one is forgetting that. Not the hundreds of LE officers, not the 1,000+ searchers, not the 14,000+ WSers, nor the thousands of other people who are following this case.
I don't believe this baby is alive... if she were, then someone would come forward. Someone would leave her in a parking lot, someone would drop her off at home or the police station... after all this publicity, they'd have to know something was wrong and let that baby go... No... this baby isn't alive anymore... and the monster needs to pay.
I wasn't trying to be rude but the common quote around here is "Do you have a link?"NG and WS is not LE or the court system and the discussion of the panels on NG are only giving opinions. So you in fact have no evidence that the evidence can be disproved. New technology can be submitted into evidence DNA was new technology at one point. And I would never ask anyone to do my research for me I am quite capable so there's no need to be rude. If you are going to make a statement plz be prepared to back it up with evidence unless your afraid it can be disproved.
I havent had any sleep so I am not coming across correctly. I know it is admissible, but it can be argued. DNA can not.
I read the posts from the "Caylee is Alive" thread and I feel like I'm on another planet to these posters.
I ask them to explain to me -
Why, if Caylee was abducted by ZG and her sister Samantha, there has not been ONE SINGLE person come forward to verify the fact that these people exist. Surely they have friends and family. Someone has to know of them. Where are they?
Put yourself in her shoes, if your baby was missing, kidnapped by ???....would you act this way?
Why didn't Casey ask TonE to get gas for her car if it had run out? Why didn't she go back even the next day and pick it up?
Why didn't she confide in someone....I mean anyone, her brother, mother, father. Just someone. Think about it. Who could bear the pain on their own, your baby has been kidnapped. You would be screaming to someone for help.
Why did Casey go out partying, having a great time with her friends after the kidnapping. Is this realistic, think about it. Would you, could you?
Why was Casey having such a great time leaving myspace and facebook messages to all her friends, after ZG kidnapped her baby girl?
Why did all of Casey's friends not notice anything different in her behaviour? She didn't seem upset, stressed, worried, why?
Would you feel like stealing money from your friend and going on a shopping trip, when your baby was missing?
Seriously, would you be thinking of having a tattoo if your child had been kidnapped? Wouldn't you be obsessed with finding her, getting her back.
Is this the behaviour of a mother whose child has been kidnapped, or of a mother who has finally got the freedom to be a free 'party girl' again?
I mean, this is only about her behaviour. I haven't even mentioned the evidence. I just cannot for the life of me, understand how anybody could possibly not see the truth. Actions speak louder than words.
I keep thinking of the saying 'out of sight, out of mine' relating to Casey!