Yes, but that's why I attached the video. How can you take it out of context. I think several towns have lost their idiots and theyre all working for Baez!
That statement is priceless!!!! LOLOLOLOL
Yes, but that's why I attached the video. How can you take it out of context. I think several towns have lost their idiots and theyre all working for Baez!
:doh::bang: He sure did say it...wow.
On Prime News while Todd Black(with Baez' office) was trying to defend JB he made a major slip of the tongue. He stated " This is a very difficult, serious case, not only involving THE LOSS OF THE LIFE OF A LITTLE GIRL but the loss of whatever is going to happen to Casey Anthony."
I've attached the link.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/10/14/pn.casey.anthony.indicted.cnn
Has he been fired yet?
Baez did the same thing and I asked here if I heard wrong - he stated that Casey was not responsible for the death of Caylee - and when I heard it I came here to see if maybe I heard out of context and if now the Anthony's think Caylee is deceased? No one responded to my question
Baez did the same thing and I asked here if I heard wrong - he stated that Casey was not responsible for the death of Caylee - and when I heard it I came here to see if maybe I heard out of context and if now the Anthony's think Caylee is deceased? No one responded to my question
They're done for.
The only thing the defense team has going for them now is to hunt loopholes or grounds for mistrial. This will put the prosecution on their toes but I have a feeling they'll do just fine.![]()
The only way they can defend this case is to attack the evidence itself, and the handling, gathering, testing, etc. such as they did in the 'Simpson matter' as Judge Ito referred to it.
I hope this doesn't work out this way, but I fear it will.
How can you take Black's words out of context? I know what he said and he cannot twist that! He should have been more careful! Major foot in mouth statement!!
I would not peg this in the "tongue slip" category. That was a full-on statement to me. Very interesting.
I really hate everyone involved in this case. On that side. Maybe except George though. Or at least he's better than a poke in the eye.
The only way they can defend this case is to attack the evidence itself, and the handling, gathering, testing, etc. such as they did in the 'Simpson matter' as Judge Ito referred to it.
I hope this doesn't work out this way, but I fear it will.