IdahoMom
Former Member
:angel: Thought I'd share this cute cartoon:
http://galleryoftheabsurd.typepad.com/14/2006/11/tomkats_fairy_t.html
http://galleryoftheabsurd.typepad.com/14/2006/11/tomkats_fairy_t.html
How did he carry her? I just saw him holding her like most dads.Linda7NJ said:I can't get over the way he carried Suri...
scary
I know I heard 50 earlier.Peter Hamilton said:E just said the wedding cost 30 million bucks--that can't be true--pretty disgusting if it is---you know, a lot of charities could have used that money
kidzndogznme said:I don't think there is anything wrong with getting civilly hitched in LA and then having your dream wedding elsewhere. And anyway, it isn't our business. Again, not a Cruise lover but if they go public, people screech about them being photo hogs. Then they go private with Suri (a baby changes everything in the way you think by the way) and people say that is suspicious. Now they are public again and everyone is crying "SHOWOFFS". Humans are never happy. Sigh.
OMGosh..I was thinking the same thing MarthaTex!Marthatex said:Why would you sing THAT to your new bride?
maybe sumbliminally talking about himself?
Look...it is their money and no one should dictate how they spend it. I am sure it was just a drop in the bucket compared to what they are worth. Charities could use some of your money also...but I don't see anyone trying to tell you whom to give it to!Peter Hamilton said:E just said the wedding cost 30 million bucks--that can't be true--pretty disgusting if it is---you know, a lot of charities could have used that money
jilly said:I agree but in this particular case the Cruise possee practically invaded the town of Bracciana and caused them a lot of inconvenience. People stood outside day and night in the cold, rain and fog to get a glimpse and they couldn't even roll the window down and give a wave. That's all they wanted. But, Cruise knowing the media was there probably didn't want to give any of them a free photo.
eve said:I think if I lived in a charming European town like this I would hate the way these celebs descended upon it and probably wern't even respectful of the local culture, except to take advantage of it for a couple days. I'm sure they acted like they were in the middle of L.A.
To not even be friendly is just par for the course. Doesn't surprise me a bit. Tom's former better half, Nicole, and Keith were so friendly to the fans and press in Australia during their wedding, even providing them with soda and beer with their well-wishes and thanks. Now that's a class act.
Eve
Peter Hamilton said:E just said the wedding cost 30 million bucks--that can't be true--pretty disgusting if it is---you know, a lot of charities could have used that money
She looks older than six months to me. However, I haven't been around babies in a long time.Anngelique said:I think Suri is a gorgeous child but doesn't anyone here still think that she looks 3-4 months older than the 6 months they claim? Look how long she is in pictures. This coming from a mother who's daughter was 23 inches at birth and wore 18 month old clothes at 9 months. It's just Suri's overall appearance, how full she is, how alert she is, how long she is, etc, just seems to scream a few months older. I've done 23+ years of daycare and start most children at 6 weeks old. I've seen all shapes and sizes in that amount of time and cared for over 30 infants in that time frame and she just doesn't seem like a 6 month old to me. The 6 month old I do daycare for now is a big child for his age but nothing like Suri.
I think it's a bit of a mystery too. BUT it could also be that she was pregnant before she met Tom and Tom wanted everyone so badly to think he was man enough to have a baby because rumors are that he can't father a child. Maybe that's why he rushed it so he could claim this child was his with just a little hiding Suri until they thought they could pass her off as a few months younger?nanandjim said:She looks older than six months to me. However, I haven't been around babies in a long time.
I know that this has been rehashed and rehashed, but the rumor is that the baby is not their biological child. I however don't understand why they would go through a sham like this. There's no shame in adopting.
I am still confounded by the very rushed and very public courtship, the sudden pregnancy and the the mystery that surrounded it. :waitasec:
That makes sense. Assuming that the pregnancy is legitimate, do you think that it is possible that Katie didn't know that she was pregnant when she met Tom?Anngelique said:I think it's a bit of a mystery too. BUT it could also be that she was pregnant before she met Tom and Tom wanted everyone so badly to think he was man enough to have a baby because rumors are that he can't father a child. Maybe that's why he rushed it so he could claim this child was his with just a little hiding Suri until they thought they could pass her off as a few months younger?
nanandjim said:That makes sense. Assuming that the pregnancy is legitimate, do you think that it is possible that Katie didn't know that she was pregnant when she met Tom?
It still is weird, to me. I mean, was Tom that deadset on a relationship with Katie that he was willing to pull off this sham?
If Chris suspected the child to be his, could he ever get a court order to have the child tested?