Tom Cruise - ALL THINGS II

  • #121
Who knows what is true... probably none of this:

The most anticipated celebrity wedding of the year may just end up falling through the cracks. Katie Holmes is reportedly having the wedding jitters and doubts about marrying Tom Cruise.
Then "Batman Begins" star gave birth to fiancй Tom's daughter Suri in April and the pair planned to tie the knot this fall. However, Katie allegedly told a visitor to the isolated Colorado retreat where she has been staying with Suri and Tom's family that she is unsure about making a "commitment" to the "Top Gun" actor.

According to Britain's Sunday Mirror newspaper, she told the visitor, I don't have my own life any more. I'm not comfortable."

A source added, "The wedding dress is bought. Tom's two adopted kids from his marriage to Nicole Kidman will be there, but just where and when is up in the air. Katie is nervous about making a commitment to Tom and the early excitement of their love affair has worn off."
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7004897373
 
  • #122
Katie should be worried, Tom is a whack job. I finally read the Vanity Fair article yesterday, I have to agree Tom sleeping with the baby was fake looking. The pictures are beautiful, but somehow the article screams publicity stunt to me.
 
  • #123
Here's a good, albeit humorous (IMO), article re Tom and Scientology. This are just a couple of good paragraphs that I enjoyed.

My favourite aspect of the teachings of Scientology lies in the story of Xenu, which is a real whopper of a tale that stretches any credibility of this pseudo-religion to its breaking point in my eyes. It should be noted that the story of Xenu is only taught to higher level Scientologists.

Xenu was the leader of the Galactic Confederacy 75 million years ago. For some inexplicable reason, Xenu brought billions of people to Earth on spaceships resembling DC-8 airliners and blew them up with hydrogen bombs. The ghosts of these exterminated people have stuck around these millions of years and interfered with our spiritual well-being all this time. The ghosts must be expunged for the human soul to ascend to a higher soul.

That, in a nutshell, is a core part of the Scientology mythos. Were you able to read the above with a straight face? I know I wasn’t.
http://www.insidermediagroup.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=124&Itemid=26
 
  • #124
southernpixie said:
I love Will Ferrell and will be utterly disappointed if this is true!


. . . Will Ferrell quipped that he was so worried about upsetting Tom Cruise with scenes in “Talladega Nights” that he joined the Church of Scientology. “I’m in the junior program right now,” he told Bang Showbiz. “I’m earning frequent flyer miles.” . . .

:(
The key word is quipped. That tells me that he was joking! That Will is a really funny guy!! Another clue is the frequent flyer mile comment. He is not earning FF miles in a Scientology junior program!! ;)
 
  • #125
Here's another rumor for the old mill. But to be honest... it almost makes sense.

The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn’t MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don’t remember, Suri’s announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn’t want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn’t newborn. After a few months it’s not so easy to recognize a baby’s exact age.

http://gossip.commongate.com/tag/chrisklein
 
  • #126
Anngelique said:
Here's another rumor for the old mill. But to be honest... it almost makes sense.

The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn’t MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don’t remember, Suri’s announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn’t want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn’t newborn. After a few months it’s not so easy to recognize a baby’s exact age.

http://gossip.commongate.com/tag/chrisklein

To me, Suri's eyes look just like Chris Klein's eyes. I was struck by that from the beginning. JMO.
 
  • #127
Juliana said:
To me, Suri's eyes look just like Chris Klein's eyes. I was struck by that from the beginning. JMO.
That's funny because after seeing this article with the picture of Chris Klein that was my first thought as well. Who knows.
 
  • #128
Anngelique said:
Here's another rumor for the old mill. But to be honest... it almost makes sense.

The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn’t MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don’t remember, Suri’s announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn’t want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn’t newborn. After a few months it’s not so easy to recognize a baby’s exact age.

http://gossip.commongate.com/tag/chrisklein

"almost makes sense" is right. But she was supposedly in the hospital the same time as Brooke Shields wasn't she? I would have thought those records had been checked. Also, didn't a friend of one of our posters go into the same room after Katie?
 
  • #129
jilly said:
"almost makes sense" is right. But she was supposedly in the hospital the same time as Brooke Shields wasn't she? I would have thought those records had been checked. Also, didn't a friend of one of our posters go into the same room after Katie?

I don't know. It could be just a silly, silly rumor... but it does make sense with that strange Tom.
 
  • #130
Anngelique said:
Here's another rumor for the old mill. But to be honest... it almost makes sense.

The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn’t MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don’t remember, Suri’s announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn’t want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn’t newborn. After a few months it’s not so easy to recognize a baby’s exact age.

http://gossip.commongate.com/tag/chrisklein




Yes, well. i made this post just the other day on another thread:




Floh said:
Oh! BTW, just a reminder of what Chris Klein looks like . . .

http://img.timeinc.net/teenpeople/images/2005/news/041405_chris_klein180.jpg

proof being in the pudding? maybe? :waitasec:

http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m315/Gapeach30185/Katie.jpg

no. of course not . . . ;)


i believe the story. i think she would be insane to marry Cruise. i think she should get those DNA tests on Suri and get the proof out there.

neither she nor her baby would starve.
 
  • #131
Anngelique said:
Here's another rumor for the old mill. But to be honest... it almost makes sense.

The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn’t MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don’t remember, Suri’s announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn’t want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn’t newborn. After a few months it’s not so easy to recognize a baby’s exact age.

http://gossip.commongate.com/tag/chrisklein


It wouldn't surprise me one bit. Some of those pics of Katie's belly late in the pregnancy did look very fake. The baby looks more like Chris than like Tom, especially with the dark eyes.
 
  • #132
Anngelique said:
Here's another rumor for the old mill. But to be honest... it almost makes sense.

The story goes that when Katie Holmes split with her exboyfriend Chris Klein in March 2005, she may or may not have realized she was pregnant with his baby. She started dating Tom in April, 2005, and according to this tale, when Tom found out she was expecting, he not only didn’t MIND , but he insisted on taking credit for the pregnancy. They abruptly got engaged in June 2005. Since the baby was scheduled to be born too soon into their relationship, Tom and Katie faked the birth date. She actually gave birth months EARLIER than the announced birth. She wore padding for the last few months after the REAL birth, and made sure she was photographed. In case you don’t remember, Suri’s announced April 18 birth was oddly undocumented - there were no hospital records or specifics. Where WAS Suri born? Tom and Katie didn’t want their baby photographed because it would be apparent that Suri wasn’t newborn. After a few months it’s not so easy to recognize a baby’s exact age.

http://gossip.commongate.com/tag/chrisklein
Makes sense to me.
 
  • #133
Mabel said:
It wouldn't surprise me one bit. Some of those pics of Katie's belly late in the pregnancy did look very fake. The baby looks more like Chris than like Tom, especially with the dark eyes.
How many months of fake pregnancy would it be, though?? Three months??? That baby didn't look that much bigger than what they claim her age is, did she??

The quick courtship, engagement and instant pregnancy is all suspect to me, though.
 
  • #134
nanandjim said:
How many months of fake pregnancy would it be, though?? Three months??? That baby didn't look that much bigger than what they claim her age is, did she??

The quick courtship, engagement and instant pregnancy is all suspect to me, though.
I thought she looked a couple months larger than claimed. Her face looks so much older than most 4 month olds. She looked to be around 6 months. But hey, every child is different and some babies look a lot older. I have an 17 month old that looks around 8 months... so who knows.
 
  • #135
Anngelique said:
I thought she looked a couple months larger than claimed. Her face looks so much older than most 4 month olds. She looked to be around 6 months. But hey, every child is different and some babies look a lot older. I have an 17 month old that looks around 8 months... so who knows.
Well, it will be interesting to see how this thing plays out. Surely, Katie wouldn't be stupid enough to allow her child to be controlled by Tom, if they split and if it is really Chris's.
 
  • #136
I have no idea..but I do have a gf that checked into the hospital to have her baby immediately after Katie. Staff told my gf that she had just checked into the room katie checked out of. FWIW
 
  • #137
JBean said:
I have no idea..but I do have a gf that checked into the hospital to have her baby immediately after Katie. Staff told my gf that she had just checked into the room katie checked out of. FWIW

I thought it was you who posted this before - wasn't sure!:)
 
  • #138
jilly said:
I thought it was you who posted this before - wasn't sure!:)
'Twas I.My gf was all excited to get Katies bed lol!
 
  • #139
JBean said:
'Twas I.My gf was all excited to get Katies bed lol!
All excited except to get the stir-ups huh, lol....
 
  • #140
michelle said:
All excited except to get the stir-ups huh, lol....
lol Michelle..There's a visual for ya!
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
85
Guests online
1,711
Total visitors
1,796

Forum statistics

Threads
632,389
Messages
18,625,587
Members
243,131
Latest member
al14si
Back
Top