Trial break: The State vs Jodi Arias; trial resumes 4 February 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,021
Have you read TA's MySpace page? I wonder if the comment about "🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬" was directed at JA. I find it a strange thing to say, esp. coming from an adult. He did not delete her as one of his "friends". Maybe by writing that he was hoping that JA would see that she was a "🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬" in his eyes and she would get the message that he was done with her. Whatever it might have been, I do not like men to call women "🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬".

http://www.myspace.com/tvalexander


"Who I'd like to meet:
HMMM well Jesus for starters. People who like to give high 5's incessantly. I'd also like to meet Osama Bin Laden in all out no holds barr, winner take all cage fight. Christopher Walken would be fun to eat Lunch with. Really most people, well except for 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. They are a dime a dozen these days especially on myspace. So if your employment involves a webcam, I don't see it going anywhere. Outside of that I'm good to go"

I found it a little uncomfortable that he captioned a photo of himself with (I assume because of this comment) a young Mexican woman "this little filly is the only good reason not to build a wall at the border". :eek:

But then there are a lot of prejudiced people in the world. My dad, for one. I still love him but I am sad that he thinks that way. :(.
 
  • #1,022
I googled Mormon undergarments. I couldn't understand what was so special about them. View attachment 29529

They look like a white tshirt with boxer brief sorta bottoms. Looks a little warm to sleep in for AZ if the AC isn't kicking.

Guess I still don't understand the magic underwear comments. What am I missing?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Temple garment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The undergarments are viewed as a symbolic reminder of the covenants made in temple ceremonies and are seen as either a symbolic or literal source of protection from the evils of the world

Temple garments are sometimes derided as "magic underwear" by non-Mormons, but Mormons view this terminology to be misleading
 
  • #1,023
I’ve watched a physician geneticist and dozens of his residents measure eye widths and Jodi's look very small, IMO. Eye width is measured on those with abnormal behavior because the width decreases with prenatal alcohol exposure and other syndromes.

Yipes.

I'd better get to a doctor FAST. :(

And my mom was a teetotaler! Who'd a thunk it?
 
  • #1,024
Temple garment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The undergarments are viewed as a symbolic reminder of the covenants made in temple ceremonies and are seen as either a symbolic or literal source of protection from the evils of the world

Temple garments are sometimes derided as "magic underwear" by non-Mormons, but Mormons view this terminology to be misleading

I see. Hmmmm they do look like they require a little wriggling to remove. I suppose getting out of those would give a person time to rethink what they were about to do...if it was sinful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #1,025
  • #1,026
  • #1,027
OK, folks. I am going to get banned and I do not care anymore. I am sick of members asking another male member who I respect very much about a man’s morning erection. There are pages of post on sexual parts and if they are normal or not, the size of a man’s penis and anal sex. It has gotten totally off topic of why we are all here. We are here because a young man was murdered long before his time. If the DT wants to trash Travis that is something they have to live with. We have no control over any of what they say or do. I do not feel we need to join in with them. I do not need to hear about his penis, what it looked like, if he had sex with her. There are pages on this same subject. What Jodi “looks” like, if she is normal, her anus and if she had had anal sex.

I literally cringe thinking if for some reason a family member comes here and what they must think of what we are discussing. How disrespectful it is to Travis and his family. How disrespectful we have become to other members asking them a very personal question he should not have to explain to anyone for any reason. I thought we were all adults here and are aware of these things. Websleuths has always been known for being a victims advocate. How are we being that with the discussions that have been going on? I thought we were adult enough to maybe comment, move on and not have pages on all things sexual then knock the defense for doing the same thing.

I am all for having a good laugh at times. There comes a time it has gone to far. We have passed that point a long time ago. It is boarding on harassment with some posters on wanting answers, links and facts. IE menÂ’s erections. Then wanting to discuss over and over the same thing. How many times does someone have to state their own opinion without having to say it again. How is it even being allowed to happen in the first place?

DonÂ’t worry about reporting me I have sent a copy of my post to Tricia. I am ready to face the consequences of my post. I think it is time to step back and look at what we are doing. How childish this has all become. How disrespectful to Travis, his family and fellow posters we have become really sickens me. :furious:


I hope that you won't leave. I said this exact thing last night and I wasn't banned. I was just told that everything discussed here was part of the trial and that it was okay. I too believe strongly that some of it is downright over the top, and I have said several times that I hope that Travis' family does NOT read here.

There are so many wonderful posts and posters here who support Travis and his family. However, some people take it too far.

I guess what I would ask before responding to a post or laughing about something that another poster has written about the victim - if this were my son or daughter, or brother or sister, would I be comfortable reading about what these strangers are saying about the victim. That should pretty much be a self-censuring thing.

Just my opinion, obviously, but I hope that you will stay because Travis and his family needs people here who will not make light of Travis as he was an innocent victim.
 
  • #1,028
Off-topic:
I am getting distracted by this poor young 5-year-old boy stuck for FOUR DAYS now in a bunker with a crazed nut. I'm surprised this story is not getting more attention from the media.
http://news.yahoo.com/authorities-release-photo-accused-ala-abductor-215324625.html

I think it isn't all over the media because the nut has tv access and its rigged with explosives. I can't even image what this child's parents are going through.

They need to wait him out. IMO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #1,029
Originally Posted by Sulamith
Have you read TA's MySpace page? I wonder if the comment about "🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬" was directed at JA. I find it a strange thing to say, esp. coming from an adult. He did not delete her as one of his "friends". Maybe by writing that he was hoping that JA would see that she was a "🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬" in his eyes and she would get the message that he was done with her. Whatever it might have been, I do not like men to call women "🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬".

http://www.myspace.com/tvalexander


"Who I'd like to meet:
HMMM well Jesus for starters. People who like to give high 5's incessantly. I'd also like to meet Osama Bin Laden in all out no holds barr, winner take all cage fight. Christopher Walken would be fun to eat Lunch with. Really most people, well except for 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬. They are a dime a dozen these days especially on myspace. So if your employment involves a webcam, I don't see it going anywhere. Outside of that I'm good to go"




So if your employment involves a webcam, I don't see it going anywhere. Outside of that I'm good to go"

I wonder if Jodi had a web that she used ?????
 
  • #1,030
Isn't that also true of ( I forget the correct term) the ridges that run vertical from under the nose to the top of the lips. Jodi's seems rather flat ... Also common in FAS? Correct??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, a flattened philtrum and thin upper lip can be associated with FAS. FAS is easier to diagnose with baby photos because as the child ages, they may develop more of a philtrum.
 
  • #1,031
Hope4more.. that is my question still. Killed him in self defense, he was in the shower there is no disputing that. She was not, she is dry and clothed.

So when did she get two weapons and where were they? What story did she have as to how they ended up in her hands. She ran out, found a stray gun laying on the floor then a butcher knife?

Why can't they address where she said she found those two weapons?
 
  • #1,032
I hope that you won't leave. I said this exact thing last night and I wasn't banned. I was just told that everything discussed here was part of the trial and that it was okay. I too believe strongly that some of it is downright over the top, and I have said several times that I hope that Travis' family does NOT read here.

There are so many wonderful posts and posters here who support Travis and his family. However, some people take it too far.

I guess what I would ask before responding to a post or laughing about something that another poster has written about the victim - if this were my son or daughter, or brother or sister, would I be comfortable reading about what these strangers are saying about the victim. That should pretty much be a self-censuring thing.

Just my opinion, obviously, but I hope that you will stay because Travis and his family needs people here who will not make light of Travis as he was an innocent victim.

Ya know, NRFTW, we don't see eye to eye on most things, but I do think we agree on this.

The sex stuff doesn't matter. Jodi's hoo ha is irrelevant. Travis' red peen is irrelevant.

They liked the sex. Mkay. Great. Not an issue with TA's murder.

Every time Jodi's lady parts get ridiculed , it's another opportunity to bring up the fact the Travis had sex with those parts.

But the thing is.....it just doesn't matter!

Has NADA to do with what that horrible person did to Travis. :(
 
  • #1,033
I see. Hmmmm they do look like they require a little wriggling to remove. I suppose getting out of those would give a person time to rethink what they were about to do...if it was sinful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ima go ahead and say it.......


Those undies, if I saw them on my would-be lover, would work like a big ole bucket of icy cold water dumped on my libido.
 
  • #1,034
Ima go ahead and say it.......


Those undies, if I saw them on my would-be lover, would work like a big ole bucket of icy cold water dumped on my libido.

:floorlaugh:
 
  • #1,035
We are lucky to have you :seeya: I luv luv luv your shoes!!!! I'm an absolute shoe freak. I guess that makes me a shoe deviant :waitasec: :floorlaugh:

ITA!:seeya:

Me too! Me too!! Me too!!!!
And noticed in an earlier post that you are looking for an actual pair like those, hope you find some - they are SO CUTE!


Not so much, anymore, but can relate!

Guess it DOES!:rocker:
 
  • #1,036
Ya know, NRFTW, we don't see eye to eye on most things, but I do think we agree on this.

The sex stuff doesn't matter. Jodi's hoo ha is irrelevant. Travis' red peen is irrelevant.

They liked the sex. Mkay. Great. Not an issue with TA's murder.

Every time Jodi's lady parts get ridiculed , it's another opportunity to bring up the fact the Travis had sex with those parts.

But the thing is.....it just doesn't matter!

Has NADA to do with what that horrible person did to Travis. :(

I haven't commented about Travis or his private parts.

For whatever reason it brings me some small measure of pleasure to make Jodi the butt of jokes and nasty comments. I don't know why, but it does. I have zero control of what the outcome of the trial is. But here, I can judge her. I like that. I deem her a psychopathic murderer. That's a far worse opinion IMO than what I think of her appearance or her junk.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #1,037
Ya know, NRFTW, we don't see eye to eye on most things, but I do think we agree on this.

The sex stuff doesn't matter. Jodi's hoo ha is irrelevant. Travis' red peen is irrelevant.

They liked the sex. Mkay. Great. Not an issue with TA's murder.

Every time Jodi's lady parts get ridiculed , it's another opportunity to bring up the fact the Travis had sex with those parts.

But the thing is.....it just doesn't matter!

Has NADA to do with what that horrible person did to Travis. :(


Yes, we do seem to agree on this. I don't, however, care who says what about Jodi. She is a monster and deserves NO respect from anyone.
 
  • #1,038
I hope that you won't leave. I said this exact thing last night and I wasn't banned. I was just told that everything discussed here was part of the trial and that it was okay. I too believe strongly that some of it is downright over the top, and I have said several times that I hope that Travis' family does NOT read here.

There are so many wonderful posts and posters here who support Travis and his family. However, some people take it too far.

I guess what I would ask before responding to a post or laughing about something that another poster has written about the victim - if this were my son or daughter, or brother or sister, would I be comfortable reading about what these strangers are saying about the victim. That should pretty much be a self-censuring thing.

Just my opinion, obviously, but I hope that you will stay because Travis and his family needs people here who will not make light of Travis as he was an innocent victim.

Thanks to both of you for the heartfelt reminder. I went to bed last night ashamed. I drastically changed my posting today. You both are good people, great contributors, fantastic barometers and I hope you will remain.
 
  • #1,039
Do you guys remember this case? I saw the documentary about this ..
Mormon sex in chains case - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A young Mormon missionary named Kirk Anderson went missing in 1977, in Ewell, Surrey, after he was abducted from the steps of a meetinghouse. A few days later a freed Anderson made a report to the police that he had been abducted, driven to Devon, and imprisoned against his will, chained to a bed in a cottage, where Joyce Bernann McKinney — a former Miss Wyoming World had abducted, attempted to seduce, and then raped him. The case became known by many sobriquets, including "The Mormon sex in chains case" and "The Case of the Manacled Mormon."
 
  • #1,040
I think it isn't all over the media because the nut has tv access and its rigged with explosives. I can't even image what this child's parents are going through.

They need to wait him out. IMO

Thanks for the info, Linda. I didn't even think about him having the television access. I have been praying for the family all day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
157
Guests online
2,385
Total visitors
2,542

Forum statistics

Threads
632,279
Messages
18,624,265
Members
243,074
Latest member
nousernameimagination
Back
Top