KandyKane
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2013
- Messages
- 319
- Reaction score
- 2,381
I'm watching JM's cross of the ridiculous Dr. Samuels concerning the fill-in-the-dot test where she lied since her story at that time was the two masked stranger story. Samuels went to the jail to administer this test but doesn't bring the complete test with him leaving out the answer sheet? Then he writes her answers on paper that he transfers to the fill-in-the-dot answer sheet himself that he supposedly forgot instead of having her write her own answers?
Raise your hand if you think he never gave her this test and sat in his office by himself filling it out based on his crappy notes of her lie story because that's exactly what I think he did. There's nothing in her own hand, and I find it outrageous that he says he went to the jail to give her this test but forgets to bring the answer section part of the test with him and then doesn't let her write her own answers. Baloney I say. He didn't spend the time and effort to have her take this test, he sat in his office and did the test himself based on his inaccurate and incomplete notes he had on her.
Then he finds out later that the story she gave that he believed was a lie does turn out to be a lie therefore the test answers are all a lie yet he never does the test again and bases his diagnosis on this lying test? How totally incompetent can anyone get?
There's no question in my mind that he "evaluated" her based on nothing but what her attorneys wanted him to say that was based on her lie story of the intruders. And her attorneys are so ridiculously incompetent that they don't even tell him that he needs to re-evaluate her based on her new story of self-defense.
This is the biggest joke I've ever seen or even heard of with both this charlatan of a doctor and these ridiculous defense attorneys butchering their own case with this nincompoop.
Raise your hand if you think he never gave her this test and sat in his office by himself filling it out based on his crappy notes of her lie story because that's exactly what I think he did. There's nothing in her own hand, and I find it outrageous that he says he went to the jail to give her this test but forgets to bring the answer section part of the test with him and then doesn't let her write her own answers. Baloney I say. He didn't spend the time and effort to have her take this test, he sat in his office and did the test himself based on his inaccurate and incomplete notes he had on her.
Then he finds out later that the story she gave that he believed was a lie does turn out to be a lie therefore the test answers are all a lie yet he never does the test again and bases his diagnosis on this lying test? How totally incompetent can anyone get?
There's no question in my mind that he "evaluated" her based on nothing but what her attorneys wanted him to say that was based on her lie story of the intruders. And her attorneys are so ridiculously incompetent that they don't even tell him that he needs to re-evaluate her based on her new story of self-defense.
This is the biggest joke I've ever seen or even heard of with both this charlatan of a doctor and these ridiculous defense attorneys butchering their own case with this nincompoop.