I think dishonest people are able to regroup rather quickly. He had all night to figure out how to reframe his approach to try to get out of this.
He said breasts on a computer are not illegal. But jodi tried to paint this picture of a sexually obsessed and abusive Travis, who had tons of
on his computer. None was found, deleted or otherwise, and here this doctor is trying to squirrel out of why he didn't find a lie in this area to be important? Ridiculous, isn't it? Instead of, "Objection, speculation.", it would be "Objection, speculation. He has no way of knowing, your honor, what a computer specialist may or may not have found on that computer."
I do too, frankly. He uses a lot of double negatives, for example: "You didn't lie, did you not?" I was taught not to do that. One judge actually kind of yelled at me for it!!!!
I think he gets very excited. But I still give him a solid A+. He's incredible. Everyone pretty much knows what he means, he uses no notes and he decimates the witnesses with their lies and inconsistencies and dishonesty. He paints a great picture on cross. Amazing.
This is Wilmott's witness so she is the only one who will object. Just like Wilmott was silent when Nurmi was handling jodi. But he observes, takes some notes and later will be using that info to strategize.
I think you're right. Looks like this is going to segue into a major issue.
Dontcha know her fog is special and defies many well known psychological and physiological facts - as well as definitions? :giggle:
