I just have to rant a bit, then feel free to throw stones at me.
I've seen JA referred to on WS as the 15 year old BJ queen,




, etc. IMHO, it's not relevent. There are plenty of





who don't kill.
Also, when we start judging people on what age they started having sex, what type of sex they have, etc., it's kind of a slippery slope. There can be rape victims whose sexual history should not be admissable.
Believe me, I see how the DT introduced JA's sexual experience as a way to somehow distort Travis' sex life. So I know sexual acts are a part of this case and will be discussed here. I just think the name calling about it stupid.
Judge JA because she is a stone-cold murderer, not because she has an extensive sexual history that began at age 15. :twocents:
*runs and ducks for cover*