trial day 39: the defense continues its case in chief #115

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,181
  • #1,182
She's lucky she didn't ruin the whole trial and waste all that money spent so far. If she has any sense she will keep her mouth shut until this trial is over. She could cause problems speaking about the trial at this point. I hope the judge advised her of that.

This is a little harsh since we don't even know what happened or what was said. :twocents:
 
  • #1,183
  • #1,184
Apparently she wasn't very attentive to those statements to remember the admonition.

I mean what is it about "do not talk" that people don't understand? Is it the age of social media we live in, where people (especially younger) think every tiny aspect of their lives need publishing? Is discretion a lost art?

SHUT THE HELL UP JURORS, JUST SHUT UP

You don't know what she said, where she said it, etc etc. Are comments like that really necessary?

If you can sign off here and not look at anything to do with the trial or say ANYTHING about it until it's over then ok, you'll have a point. :p but until then :p
 
  • #1,185
hehe I love the look that travis' sister is giving Jodi! I wasn't fast enough to grab a screen shot and cant rewind darn it.
 
  • #1,186
just in case u guys don't remember: Abe denies ever receiving this email!

I thought he got some kind of email and after that he was like WTF??? Did I hear anti-sematic comments thrown in gratuitously?
 
  • #1,187
Did anyone else think Wilmott seemed a bit flustered when she said the tshirt said Travis Alexander's ...then rushed on with the " important part"? I'm wondering if it was a slip..maybe the back of shirt said Alexander's blog afterall?!
 
  • #1,188
Abe emphatically stated on DD that he never received any email from JA, lol

That's because she never sent it.

This is a fake email. The BCC line is showing. Which means it was an edited email.
 
  • #1,189
This forwarded email was just another way of stalking Travis. The email was most likely edited.
 
  • #1,190
I really think that if I was given the opportunity, I hate JA so much that I could easily beat her to death. I want that smug look wiped off her ugly face.:furious:

Why does she sit there like that? She's a murderer! It's really beyond comprehension. I HATE HER.
 
  • #1,191
omg i love juan but he covered his gray??? omg
 
  • #1,192
This is a travesty!!! AVL is worse than the proverbial 'town gossip'. She's mouthing all of the garbage that came out of JA's mouth on Direct! She looks like she's really into it, too - how UNPROFESSIONAL! She didn't know ANY of the people she is trashing!!! JA is sooo smug - first she gets juror #5 knocked off the jury - and now she has AVL verifying all of her lies! Travis was a 'player'... SO WHAT??? JA knew it but she continued to 'play him'. She lost - she murdered him. Case closed! Can hardly wait for rebuttal - Juan needs to put the Hugh's on the stand and wipe that smirk off JA's face...permanently!
 
  • #1,193
  • #1,194
Hold the phone! If ALV "doesn't do email much," what the hek is she doing analyzing email messages? We all know that there can be difficulty assessing email tone, content, wording, vocabulary based upon the language of email.


:rocker: Exactly ... she should NOT be allowed to !

:furious: This trial has been so UNFAIR to Travis ...

:furious: And disgustingly favorable to the defendant :furious:
 
  • #1,195
Even though Juror #5 was excused and has no more obligation to this case, would she be allowed to come in to court as a spectator now? Or would that be prejudicial? If it were me, I'd want to go back just to show Jodi's smug mug she didn't win... lol
 
  • #1,196
People can moan about Belvin Perry all they want but this woman (Stephens) is making me NUTS. She is in wayyyyyy over her head, IMO.

There is NO FOUNDATION for these emails and THIS DV expert is most certainly not qualified to be tesitfying about them.

If the tables were turned and these emails were favorable to the State were brought in by the prosecution, & permitted to be discussed by an unqualified expert, this would be a PERFECT appellate issue.
She does not seem to have the confidence to preside over a DP case IMO. It is her first one and no seeming criminal trial experience from what I have read.
 
  • #1,197
I still wonder if this juror was ratted out by another juror and so Jodi may feel some Juror has her back if you know what I mean

To be honest if I were a juror then I'd tell the Judge if I noticed anything off. I like to play by the rules especially in a trial like this.
 
  • #1,198
judge is looking upset! too bad JW
 
  • #1,199
I wonder why the Jodi innocent site was taken down. rofl You think maybe they started all this crap and afraid someone (JM) might come after them in some way.
 
  • #1,200
I still wonder if this juror was ratted out by another juror and so Jodi may feel some Juror has her back if you know what I mean

I thought the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
2,322
Total visitors
2,414

Forum statistics

Threads
632,164
Messages
18,622,963
Members
243,041
Latest member
sawyerteam
Back
Top