TigerBalm
Pray for all the missing and innocent people whose
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 6,189
- Reaction score
- 22
Yes and I really dont understand why they cant just let their client have her day in court, let the truth and the evidence tell the story, and be done with it. What does a mistrial get them? The evidence would still be the same in a new trial. Are we really at the point where it's about wins and losses for the attorneys that matter?
MOO
A very significant development today was the motion to deny the admittance of the closet evidence. If this testimony and pictures gets in then it is over for Ms. Arias. She can't claim self defense if she doesn't get a gun from the closet and she can't get the gun if the shelf can't bear her weight. So what are the chances it come in?
Today was a bombshell day, wonder what Juan has in store for tomorrow.
Autograph copies of manifesto for when famous
Self comparison to Einstein
LOL...oh no. Didn't you hear? You weren't here earlier when you were voted as the one to do the in depth study! :laughcry:
Does it bother anyone else as much as it bothers me that ALV says "Mr. Martinez" at the end of so many of her answers?
she always has been!
1)no jury will acquit me
2) let me put my makeup on
3) her moves (dang those were STRANGE)
5) MANIFESTO?
my gosh what ELSE will she try to come up with. does she not know that people are SMART. We can figure this out? We do not have to have degrees or titles or anything else.. us people hear what we hear and know what is going on and this is utter CRAP.
cue static.
I AM SURE that lav employed her static when she wanted to and IF SHE DIDN'T AND SHE WAS TRULY OBJECTIVE THEN TURN OVER THE INTERVIEW TAPES
SHE WONT
we have to remember that the jury has seen all of this.
Huh, what gyn report?
I think that we have a double murder trial. If you've killed once, what is going to stop you from a second one.
Khaki, I apologize in advance but I am a little late on this response. Yes it bothers me tremendously; she is using a therapeutic technique that is popular in "in prison therapeutic communities" and with many Associate and Bachelors level substance abuse counselors whose education was obtained prior to the mid 1980's.
in a year (i am being sarcastic? but not sure if I am really being sarcastic at this point)
I agree and here is why.
page 19
http://grahamwinch.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/floresinvestigationreport.pdf
**"The digital card had several pictures on it, including SOME, which had been deleted."
??????? Were there pictures that were not deleted?? The accidental ones?
**"Detective Melendez stated there were OTHER unallocated photos on the digital card that he would have to work on to retrieve.
She did delete the shower pictures. I believe she uploaded them to her camera first. For a "trophy"
UNALLOCATED PHOTOS but NOT deleted???
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN???:banghead:
could these have been downloaded onto the camera from another source at around 1 pm? Kinda sounds like it. moo
It's condescending, IMO. She's trying to equalise her perceived "power differential". I'm guessing it's all about power for LaViolette.
I don't think JA had any second thoughts. There was no fight downstairs in his office. This is another of JA's lies to help solidify her claim of physical abuse leading up to the murder. JA thought she could confine the killing field to the shower for easy clean up.
Perhaps she is so beyond evil that she killed TA after sex so he would have no time to repent.
Given the cost of this trial, the defense may believe that a mistrial would result in the prosecution being more amenable to a plea bargain.
I am curious, what do you think her punishment should be ?
A very significant development today was the motion to deny the admittance of the closet evidence. If this testimony and pictures gets in then it is over for Ms. Arias. She can't claim self defense if she doesn't get a gun from the closet and she can't get the gun if the shelf can't bear her weight. So what are the chances it come in?
Just like in the Casey Anthony case, they tried to reach and say that the photo of Caylee reaching for the door handle proves she was able to open it and get into the pool by herself. It only shows her reaching, not that she was able to open it!:banghead:We both see photos. They are both naked. They are never seen naked at the same time. Yet, just because you see naked photos, you assume that sex was involved. I don't. I am an ex-investigator/LE and that is not the way you look at cases. You don't take the evidence and try to get it to fit your opinion/idea. You take the evidence at face value and build from there.
I can't leap from seeing two naked people to the fact that they had sex.
As I said previously, it doesn't really matter. It just bothers me when people take evidence and twist it into their version of the story. That's all. Carry on.![]()