trial day 43: the defense continues its case in chief #130

[atthelake]

Nursebeeme has set up a thread for people with Android phones to try to figure out what is going on! I am on a phone and cannot cut and paste the link on this phone, but I assume that others can see! Anyone who figures it out please share with others as of right now I think there are more than 20 people who have this problem.


Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

 

[BunnyHop]

Whoosh~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
out the door. BRB. :great:

Yoga pants and flip flops it's 70 here today.

Whoo Hoo. :great:

 

[VALee]

Which of these is not like the other:

IQ as high or higher than Einstein ... believes LDS would approve oral and anal sex but NOT vaginal sex before marriage?

Welcome to the zoo Retro...um given your name, are you old-fashioned? Just curious, seems to be a hot topic today...

Fun Fact: IQ tests were developed after Albert Einstein's death, so his IQ is not known or recorded.

Given that, both statements only exist in an 'alternate reality.'

:seeya:

 

[Miss Behavin]

So Alyce is watching the tape of Jodi's dad before court resumes this afternoon?

 

[Ricki]

HLN is reporting that Alyce is behind closed doors viewing JA's Dads police interview.

 

[josie1986]

weren't we meant to be back at 1.25? guess i shouldn't ever expect them to be on time

 

[artsy1]

IMO it would not benefit them. Say they get an X-ray and it IS broken- then that lends credence to JA's claim that it truly is broken and the dispute about whether it occurred at the hands (or kick) of TA in January 2008 or some other time unrelated to TA or during the murder as TA tried to defend himself (in JA's view, as he was attacking her) - that dispute would still remain.
If an X-ray was done and there is no break, JA could still claim it was sprained so badly that it remains crooked (and as a lay person she just though crooked=broken) and still attribute it to the kick.
So no matter what the results, it wouldn't resolve the dispute.
Now if she were truly telling the truth, the DEFENSE would get the X-ray to show it is broken. Since they have not done that, it is likely she is not telling the truth and the injury is probably not a break, but the result of a cut tendon occurring as her hand slid on the knife while stabbing TA. Only an MRI or CT scan of some sort would possibly show tendon injury. Even then, she could STILL claim TA did it with the kick in January - it would be unbelievable, just as it is now without any radiologic studies.

Note JA's left ring finger on the still photo (2nd set of pics down - next to pic of her friend Patti, it's actually the link for the video) - taken in 2004:

http://www.hlntv.com/shows/nancy-grace


Compare it to her finger in court in 2013 (photo #1):

http://www.examiner.com/slideshow/ar...slide=58779206


That knuckle that Travis allegedly broke in 2008 looks the same to me.

She doesn't bend her 1st knuckle on either picture. The only way I can do that on my own fingers is if I use my double jointed finger to make it go straight like that.

 

[MistyM]

what would that prove? nobody can prove with an xray or an MRI whether it happened in january or in june of 2008. she says january. but she also ADMITTED it was in june when she spoke to det. flores.

if there's a way to date an injury like that, i don't know about it. unless a fracture (and i don't even think it WAS fractured) is healing and showing varying stages of bone formation, i'm not sure you can say with accuracy when a fracture happened---and certainly not narrow it down to a 6 month window. this now happened 5 years ago.

besides being another of her lies, the issue of premeditated murder doesn't depend on that finger. JMO.

i suppose they could tell if it was an injury or just a natural thing she can do.
then they could also check if it was a fracture or a tendon injury (like from a knife while stabbing someone)

and yes, it doesn't show premeditation. i don't think they have to do any testing at this point it's pretty obvious she's lied about how she aquired it and i'm sure the jury knows.

 

[G&AMom]

I have been recalling a never-married, elderly relative (long deceased now) who was about 85 when she was called as a witness to identify an arsonist who she saw while he was watching the fire from a nearby alley...

Q: Is the man present in the courtroom today?
A: Hell, yes. That guy over there. He was yanking on his d**** outside my Eastern Star meeting.

So... ALV is more old fashioned than my relative (and about 60 years younger)....

I think this may be the post of the day. :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[rose222]

It was shocking to hear ALV say that she'd want to act normal after such an event (killing) or something like that.

Really? What a decent person would do after something like that is call 911!!!!!!1 CRY! Be terrified!

Why would anyone want to act normal after stabbing another 29 times including cutting throat from ear to ear plus a gun shot?

 

[Novice Seeker]

Bet the issue JW was going to do at 1:00 is being done in chambers. I really hope the media starts pushing for access.

 

[Hopeful One]

Well, I decided to stay at work in order to miss as little court as possible. So this guarantees that we will not only start late, but there with be a meeting in chambers or an extra-long side bar.

 

[newsjunkie]

Nursebeeme has set up a thread for people with Android phones to try to figure out what is going on! I am on a phone and cannot cut and paste the link on this phone, but I assume that others can see! Anyone who figures it out please share with others as of right now I think there are more than 20 people who have this problem.


Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

[ame="http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=204817"]watching the trial on an android phone? post your solutions here: - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community[/ame]

 

[SheltieMom1]

I am getting so tired of these talking heads saying JM is to aggressive and he could turn off some of the jurors!! Seriously what do you all think??

I think they are wrong. They are told to take that side in the debate in order to stir up emotion and improve ratings. IMO. lease:

 

[Nosey Parker]

I am getting so tired of these talking heads saying JM is to aggressive and he could turn off some of the jurors!! Seriously what do you all think??

What do I think? I don't think Juan is aggressive at all. I think he is spirited and dedicated to justice.

 

[Lorelilly]

I'm wondering if ALV is planning on retiring soon and needs this money to make that happen. If so she probably doesn't care if she gets more work or not.

She may not have a choice whether to retire or not. She murdered her career using her own words. There goes Jodi the Black Hole again. Wave on your way out the door Alyce. Bye bye.

 

[nursebeeme]

HLN is reporting that Alyce is behind closed doors viewing JA's Dad police interview.

ah so! this is the ex parte hearing theme

 

[lisalove]

I am getting so tired of these talking heads saying JM is to aggressive and he could turn off some of the jurors!! Seriously what do you all think??

I think they are just that, talking heads. Juan's record speaks for itself. He knows what he's doing and that's how he wins so many cases. I'm sure he's sent more people to death row then most of them have!

 

[luvtenniss]

I am getting so tired of these talking heads saying JM is to aggressive and he could turn off some of the jurors!! Seriously what do you all think??

I disagree with those talking heads!! The jury is seeing how difficult ALV is being on purpose. They probably wish he was even tougher on her.

 

[Weebles]

HLN is reporting that Alyce is behind closed doors viewing JA's Dad police interview.

Bets on her saying he is not believable because he is a man?