trial day 43: the defense continues its case in chief #130

[ilovewings]

OMG she is so over the top- i have never seen anything like it and i hope i never do again. she should be held in contempt

 

[biggirl]

TIME OUT! I am so outraged! HOW DARE SHE!!!!!

 

[R.U.Kidding!]

Why do I get the feeling all the writing being done by JA and Wilmont is nothing more than ...........writing

OMG< OMG<OMG<OMG!

I think they are ready to shut her up themselves. Maybe JA can use one of those PENS she has been collecting and sharpening as a weapon.

 

[wenwe4]

JA likes to play the victim when they were teenagers
she was younger than that . . .I thought they were teens but I was incorrect.
about the same time the father made statement about lack of truthfulness
I gave the wrong answer . . yu are asking me to put those two things together
previous to th break you testified Zana Coronzo said she like to be victim
same age 14 -what the Father said.

you went back to JA and discussed anal sex
I talked about lubricant - I did talk about anal sex specifically the lubricant
as you asked me in interview who brought the lubricant fo the anal sex . . .
(who did btw????)

get the specifics about that or did your prejudices provent you from doing that - you said you were old fashioned . . . did you talk to her about anal sex
whomever she had anal sex
she tried it - she didn't like it - only one she had anal sex with TA - I askd her about anal sex.
all these other individuals or just anal sex with TA?
I talked to her about anal sex with other people
did she indicate Bobby Juarez? (Quadez?) . . . not sure spelling

not important in assessing DV -which I was really asked to do here
do you know if she had anal sex with MM
they attempted it and she didn't like it
with Mr. Brewer?
they experimented and neither of them pursued sam with MM

there were attempts . . it was not consummated
it wasn't pursued - they did not continue . . it was not enjoyable and they did not continue as a practice.

if an area you don't feel you want to discuss -
if doesn't feel relevant to DV
feeling of relevance or don't pursue
if it isn't relevant I don't pursue
person who determines relevance is you
in terms of DV - I would be the person - my mind, and experience
could be that other people don't think what you think is importance

sure
could you be wrong
anyone could - I am sure I could be wrong
you could be wrong about it's importance
I don't believe I am hypothetically anything could be true

you are aware of telephone conversation wit JA and TA where they are involved in sex. . yes - listened to it . . . before or after . .?
it was your belief it was recorded b y TA
I believe it was JA
on 11/14/2012 we had conversation about that - your understanding of who taped conversation-
you have the paper I don't remember give different answer - I believe what on that paper correct and I hadn't formed - I had partial opinion about DV.
what date this trial started
beginning of this year
jury selection started last year - Dec 2012
we dicussed this in November - a month before this trial was to start
you gave your opinion -then you went and did some other work?
I did some other work
why did you give me your impression this was a DV relationship
I had read all IM's, emails, a lot of collateral data but hadn't read everything . .

if you already had opinion why get more after talking to prosecutor
I wanted all the information . . .
your opinion was complete when we spoke -defendant was a victim of DV . . looked @ all corroboration you had looked @ . . .you were not waffling back in Nov 2012 - certain of your opinion . . there is no purpose served in going back and doing more work if you have already reached opinion
more info I have - better off I am - I do that in all my cases - I don't stop gaterhing info. .
telephone ccall you knew about it - person who tape recorded it was TA . .
that I thought it was
everything can be prefaced with "I think"
I don't have a record to refer to like you - I made some mistakes in my interview - I misspoke didn't get info from JA . .
didn't pay attention to detail because you were already in the defendant's camp . . matter to you? yesor no
context and big picture -all of the evidence not the date

I am asking about telephone call . . not the date
your knowledge of who recorded it
I made mistak about who recorded it
mistake about that - this is only piece of evidence where TA is actually present - you can hear his voice .. . 90% is body language . . . can't get body language at least get inflections in voice . . . much better than text message

you thought TA had written the wrong name on a text
yes
you can hear interaction between the two
not necessarily make it better it is different
a recorded sex tape doesn't necessarily have to be any more accurate . . . look @ compilation a lot of text, IM, emails . . .

that information is as good as something in writing?
which is better tape recorded conversation or a text message?
I can't say which is better . . there is a large number of text, IM's, there is one sex tape I listened to . . they are important but I have to take all that info in . ..

coiuld hear in TA's tone of voice whether he is happy or unhappy
what he presents . .
you talked to JA and she presented evidence when talk to you . . TA is talking and he is presenting to you - he doesn't know it . . he doesn't have the issue of secondary gain. . .
depends on how you define that

the individual point of view that someone might be deceitful

secondary gain - not getting something from an atty - could be what you get from sex . .
maybe talking about masturbation? equating they may have . . . TA was in the same relationship .

Judge if you were in my group I would ask you to take time out Mr. Martinez
Judge will you please admonish witness?

yes please answer the questions

May 10 th 2008 - intimate conversation
they were being sexual, a tenderness, feeling they were getting along, no indicatiaon from tape itself JA was enjoying as much as TA . . . only connected thru wireless space - I cannont speak to how much someone is enjoying sex on tape . . . particularly female - JA has 2 orgasms . . . TA had one . . enjoy themselves
Have you seen When Harry met Sally
can't tell if she is having an orgasim . . I can't tell if either one had an orgams . .

no other information from collateral sources he was or wasn't have orgasm if nothing out there to support that . . . what led you to believe TA was not having an orgasm . . .
once again my expertise is in DV not in orgasm . . . you ask questions so quickly . . . I should sit back and answer only n the DV what I was askd to do.

you are advocating on behalf of the defendant

 

[spcagrl]

I can't take a whole lot more of this!

 

[lisalei321]

She just said that she's not an expert in orgasms....who would admit that????????????

 

[Weebles]

oh snap - only repeating things that would benefit JA

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

Ive forgotten the point here.

Jodi lied. This is all based on "that's what she said". The whole trial is based on she lied.

I had a When Harry met Sally moment when Juan stood up to take Jodi on the stand, and I think many around the world did also.


Ut oh..take more time to think....ching ching..

 

[AZlawyer]

No she didn't!!!!! Legal eagles can she be fined for her rude outbursts?

I suppose so, if the judge has warned her enough times. I've never seen it happen, but there's always a first time.

 

[Sweetiemom]

Juan is brilliant. Calling her out on her bias.

 

[jojomonkey]

Now that I cleaned up my tea. Time out LOL I just spit my tea out and that is not cool. Losing weight here and I only allow myself a cup of tea a day. She just made me waste a sip.

Off topic but are you ONLY drinking one cup of tea per day - no other sustenance? Don't make me lecture you...

 

[BeachGirlFromPA]

No, to When Harry Met Sally, but we as heck saw:

WHEN JODI MET TRAVIS!

 

[SassyMom]

Wow, he is laying this old crone bare. She's trying to imply that Jodi was faking her O on the phone FOR Travis. He is REALLY forcing her to reveal her true feelings.

Wow.

 

[nursebeeme]

she mis speaks a lot.

 

[vinayd]

Did she really turn to Jodi like "yea girl sustained" no those were not her words but they are kicking it in court as if Jodi is not on trial smh

 

[Horace Finklestein]

good god, this woman is insane.. telling JM if you were in my group I'll gave you a time out.. my jaw is open

No kidding. Treats adults like children and sounds like a 3rd rate Stuart Smalley.

 

[snowcat]

ALV is imploding all over the courtroom. Too bad.

She doesn't even seem to realize JM has gotten her to demonstrate her stubborn disregard for getting all the facts in a very serious case , her one-sided view and combativeness. Juan has had a great day but I honestly believe she thinks she's winning!

 

[Miss Behavin]

Aaaaaand there goes Jodi with eye rolls and whispers to Willmott

 

[gauntlet]

Anyone catch JA's eye roll on video?

@WildAboutTrial

Alyce will be playing at Standup Live tonight from 8-9pm. Tickets are free. #JodiArias

 

[rose222]

Did you guys see Will and JA roll their eyes?