trial day 45: the defense continues its case in chief #136

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #2,861
There's court tomorrow?

My question too. I thought I heard the judge say "tomorrow" but they're usually off on Friday.
 
  • #2,862
Well. I liked those questions. :)

To summarize, "Assuming that the defendant lied to you and her attorneys failed to disclose things to you, would you acknowledge that you might have been played for a fool?"
 
  • #2,863
Couldn't answer number of males she represented.

WAIT A MINUTE - Didn't she get to see these questions ahead of time and weren't we grumpy about that?

I got the feeling she wanted to give the impression that she had not read the questions earlier. Maybe I'm just too skeptical!
 
  • #2,864
JA's personal deputy was standing right on top of her...JA looked PO'd!

wonder if the jail is having "problems" with her?

I Love this jury!

Yep, I heard she tried to sneak more pens out..so they are watching CLOSELY and little Ms Sneakyface cannot pull anything so she is pouting lol.

And second that, I LOVE THIS JURY TOO!! They sure got ALVs number ha ha!
 
  • #2,865
The question about ALV's side glances towards Arias was amazing! That was a like a real personal question. lol.

90% non verbal communication statement coming back to bite her once again :great:
 
  • #2,866
Somethings been bugging me.
Travis was abused as a child.
Couldn't he be more likely to put up with abuse from JA (mental and physical) because of all he suffered as a child?
 
  • #2,867
It's been mentioned on here that she's wearing a bullet proof vest. Does anyone know if this is fact? If so, how special.

No, she is not.
 
  • #2,868
Heard the judge just say 9am after most had already left the courtroom... was watching the live feed after court had recessed and she said this when the attorneys left the sidebar.

So I wonder if we are starting court at 9am or just in chambers at 9am ?

Maybe they got some more questions to review? Or it's a short day and she wants any problems dealt with early?

Whatever, we know court will start late, no matter what she says.
 
  • #2,869
IMHO everything that ALV says and believes in makes her so out of touch with the reality of this world in the year 2013. She's looking at this case with the eyes of a dinosaur. :moo:
 
  • #2,870
This is what I believed- they gave her limited info- she doesn't have the :banghead:whole picture for her "contexts"

Litebulb, for me.
 
  • #2,871
I'm going cold turkey on the trial until 12:30 tomorrow... Going to play with the dog, pick up a pizza and watch the Yankees. See you good people tomorrow and prayers for Travis' family and Juan, Det Flores and Travis' warriors! :rocker:
 
  • #2,872
Everyone lies.

ALV thinks she's House!
 
  • #2,873
I think the progression of the questions toward the end was quite telling . . . there are quite a few jurors not buying the story if JA is the one that told it.
 
  • #2,874
Cannot believe HLN is so far behind on what is common knowledge by now..(twitter/Donovan/sheriff Joe)...

Its already been admitted/confirmed that Donovan is tweeting for JA....its not illegal--do they not have a producer/intern smart enough to Google? Or read a Fox news story/interview.


Do they think we are stupid??? Obviously they do....
 
  • #2,875
JA doesn't like the bailiff standing so close to her AT ALL.

Maybe he told her that all the guys he works with are fans of her ... photos.
 
  • #2,876
There is court tomorrow at 9:30 a.m. Arizona time. The Judge has decided that they will work on some Fridays!
 
  • #2,877
So while everyone else shares a little joke, JA pretends she's not off back to jail!
 

Attachments

  • all.jpg
    all.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 114
  • japol002.jpg
    japol002.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 136
  • #2,878
If Alyce was truly the professional she claims to be, she would have asked for more information, she would have demanded that she be able to have contact with some of the witnesses (esp. defense ones) and ask the hard questions. But, face it folks, she was probably not the first choice of the defense and once they got the invite and looked at the case, they undoubtably said, "Nope, not a chance... not interested." Because if you look at the case from the simplest of terms, would you try to present it as a Domestic abuse/battery? C'mon, folks... 29 stab wounds? That's a bit excessive... oh and the knifer had a small cut or broken finger. Sure.
 
  • #2,879
crud, Maybe I will ask over in Katie's thread or somewhere not log jammed because if anyone has answered my question it was lost among the 10000000s of posts

Why the heck is JA wearing a bullet proof vest openly before the jury when just a few weeks ago her shackles would create a "negative" impression. Why is she wearing a bullet proof vest like some victim in danger of being shot or abused in some physically threatening way??????? Does that not create an impression on the jury??

WTH?
 
  • #2,880
Well. I liked those questions. :)

To summarize, "Assuming that the defendant lied to you and her attorneys failed to disclose things to you, would you acknowledge that you might have been played for a fool?"

Go ahead and spit it out AZLawyer . .. tell us what you think . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
2,289
Total visitors
2,405

Forum statistics

Threads
632,764
Messages
18,631,448
Members
243,291
Latest member
lhudson
Back
Top