Many of these juror questions are similar in content and tone to the prosecution's line of inquiry.
This is consistent with 'Insider' reports that jurors are more engaged, "snap to" or "come to" attention, sit on the edges of their chairs, and otherwise express heightened interest when JM questions witnesses.
They are also focusing on defense witnesses beyond the verbal content of their testimony; e.g, facial expressions, gestures, signals, etc.
The Pinellas County 12, they're not.
Credit where credit is due...
Thanks! Missed the interview, however, that was going to be my "expert opinion".
:floorlaugh:
MOO
I am STUNNED that the DT let that one through!
How about DB herself!And someone using an account under JA's name Tweeted about it.
:what:
A good thing to keep in mind, only a few jurors are asking these questions. Our court observers and Beth Karas said half maybe even less than half are submitting questions. A lot of silent jurors we don't know what the are thinking.
ALV told the jury that her opinion was formed by "corroborated evidence". Yeah, like the stuff backing up the spidey undies & "child". Mm-hmm!
It was enlightening that her "big picture" has so many missing pieces. I was sure that she had a chance to go through all of the evidence and only cherry-picked what she felt like reviewing.
Has ALV and/or the jury been told about the tire slashing incidents and the "whoredom" threatening email to Lisa? That's the thing with effective stalkers ... although people may immediately know who did what, there may not be official "proof" for cops to follow up on in order to start the paper trail of records.
Great day and great questions! I share some posters' apprehension that a few of the Q's suggested at least one juror is open to the abuse story, but (assuming that is the case) it wont affect the guilt phase of deliberations.
Funny that a juror thought Alyce was the target if the secret messages. "We need to fix this."