nursebeeme
Registered User
- Joined
- May 3, 2008
- Messages
- 53,158
- Reaction score
- 226
:seeya:Please get your coffee and begin moving over to the new thread. This thread will close in 5 minutes
:seeya:Please get your coffee and begin moving over to the new thread. This thread will close in 5 minutes
well, that's the debate...
The thing is that at no time that we know of did Travis take steps through legitimate means to keep her out of his life. And, three weeks before his death, he is carrying on hours of sex tapes with her and saying loving and flattering things to her.
Do the men you represent do that? Do they continue to have sex with the woman who is abusing them even though they are not married and living in separate homes and even separate states?
Do they refuse to take out restraining orders? Or to report violations to the police?
When did Travis decide that Jodi was a problem? Because I don't see him doing anything to protect himself from her.
IMO
It's because nobody understands domestic violence. The Defense doesn't even understand their own case. Alyce tried to explain it from the stand but it went right over everyone's head.
Twenty years ago a therapist told me men express guilt as anger. It went right over my head. I had no idea what he was talking about.
But, that's the key. That is why domestic violence escalates. The more the man leads the double life, the more guilt he feels, the more guilt he feels, the more he acts it out as anger, the more he acts it out as anger, the more guilt he feels. IT'S LIKE A SNAKE EATING ITS TAIL.
That is why Alyce said on the stand--it is ok to feel anger, but it's what you do when you feel that emotion that is the problem. And, she pointed out that Travis anger, as demonstrated in the texts, was now over the top as RAGE, and not only that, but a rage which was not quickly abating.
There's a lot going on here, and nobody seems to be getting it, including the DT.
IMO
Then why isn't the Prosecution telling us this?
New thread open... please start moving over as this one will close in 15 minutes.... thanks
trial day 46: the defense continues its case in chief #138 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
:seeya:
I honestly think that they looked at the success of the sexual abuse allegations in the CA case and tried to adapt the same principle to this case.
lol. what can a person do to force a person from their life? even restraining orders do NOT work! crazy person is going to do what crazy person wants to do.
and to say he did NOTHING to get her out of his life is disingenuous at best.
first, we have information of private conversations that went on between them face to face. next, he changed his garage code so she didn't have it. next, he told her off which, this sane woman would take as: go away. how the hell did he know she would end up killing him? most of the crap she did, he probably didn't even know about or have tangible evidence he could take to the police!
and please substitute man for woman. your bias against men is showing. how many women stay in abusive relationships and NEVER tell anyone?! MANY. ive done it myself. im an example of one who never got the restraining order and stayed with him too long.
she certainly didn't do it by herself. i don't buy the 'she had a breakthrough' story samuels told AT ALL.
the defense does this: 'what can we ARGUE against the state's evidence?'
it doesn't have to be true. that's the prosecutor's job. so they came up with this because it's all they had left.
they'd been through: 1. she didn't do it, wasn't there. 2. she WAS there but some other people did it.
what's left? insanity? that won't work. she did too much to cover her tracks. so here we are. SELF DEFENSE, which is just as unbelievable as 1. and 2., but they had to go for it anyway.
:seeya: I'm just asking here, don't take offense, but do you believe our judicial system should allow itself to be blackmailed into giving the defendant the sentence he or she would prefer?
I've fluctuated depending on whether I'm roasting for espresso (I have a Gaggia that will generate sufficient pressure and temp) or drip. I've done a wide range of Ethiopians ("Yirgacheffe" broadly) just to second crack (only a couple of snaps tops), and can get lots of fruit and great cooling flavor change. Some are actually quite strong with blueberry and strawberry flavor, but only just after first crack.
I've tried a lot from South/Central America. One of the best actually came from Brazil, believe it or not. At full city, it was full-bodied and chocolatey. They haven't had it through my supplier since -- bought 25 pounds of green beans at the time. Still hoping... :coffeews:
I think that even ALV possesses that level of technology.
![]()
Please get your coffee and begin moving over to the new thread. This thread will close in 15 minutes
BBM
THANK YOU. That was exactly what she was doing, imo. Trying to enrage him, and then her reply= ' Have a nice day.'
It was so disingenuous for the DV expert to pretend that Jodi said ' have a nice day' as a way to DE-ESCALATE. I call BS. That was a passive-aggressive way to upset him even more.
Didn't the judge have a sheet of paper with the questions typed out? Not that I saw the paper, but it appeared she was reading many questions from the same paper. I figured they were typed up for the attorneys and nobody saw the handwritting. I also noticed the paper in the judges hands had no folds. Another reason I believe nobody saw the original jury questions.
Bold is mine-
But a virgin would not necessarily know this. Some men who aren't virgins don't know this.
.......That said, I think it is professionally and intellectually and morally irresponsible for Alyce to accept only limited information without asking for more context. .......