trial day 47: the defense continues its case in chief #142

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,001
IMO as to jodi's positioning and distance from TRavis when she took that photo.

Am with you I'm still shaking my head.
 
  • #1,002
Ok just got home and turned on the live stream. What is this hearing about? What are they trying to say. Sooo confused.
 
  • #1,003
But in any event - they are grasping at straws. How can he testify what is "back at his lab" is so much better. Is everyone supposed to just take his word on that?
 
  • #1,004
I see no point to any of this testimony. Am I missing something?
 
  • #1,005
IMO as to jodi's positioning and distance from TRavis when she took that photo.

arias testified that she was crouching
 
  • #1,006
This is so unbelievable! Let's bring in experts regarding the "hand on the naughty part" as well, why don't we?

This is nothing more than stretching like a Rorschach test. This is speculation of the nth degree.

I want to pull my hair out. Do we have a hair pulling emoticon?

Seriously, this is why DP cases get ca-razy. They get far too much latitude...much more than LWOP. It's obscense. If this evidence was entered, it would be so prejudicial against the State. It would insert a level of reasonable doubt that is based on speculation so inconsistent with the evidence. I just can't believe this is happening.

If I didn't have such confidence in Juan to rebut this carp, I would literally be pulling out my own teeth.

I so agree about the Rorschach analogy...

And here is a pulling hair smilie... :pullhair:

: pullhair :

HTH>>>
 
  • #1,007


 
  • #1,008
Well, according to his outline...she was standing...she testified that she was kneeling.

I don't think the outline shows whether there is standing/kneeling.
 
  • #1,009
  • #1,010
So what is the point???

that's my question. there's a form in the reflection of someone taking a picture. we have to assume it's her. is this about how far away she was??? what the hell?

i don't get the relevance or why the nurmi wants this in.
 
  • #1,011
This is so embarrassing!!!!
 
  • #1,012
Something else I'm confused about, though I did come in late on what was happening today: This DT witness, I thought he was the one who extracted the photos for the police department. So how could he be a DT witness? Anyone? TIA
 
  • #1,013
Has the defense team stooped to the level of a blob in an eyeball? I think so....
 
  • #1,014
Close ups of Travis's eye on three monitors in darkened courtroom while attys at sidebar
 
  • #1,015
Mmmkay.....
facepalm.jpg


Am I on earth?

I'll raise your FacePalm to this one :)

14820bestfacepalmgifeve.gif
 
  • #1,016
zebra-social-media-expert.jpg
 
  • #1,017
can someone tell me if he has said there is more that one image in the refelction?
 
  • #1,018
Sounds to me like Nurmi is thinking this case is going to ruin his career - no more $225/hr clients, so he's going to make this last as long as he possibly can.
Greed - pure and simple.
 
  • #1,019
It might be a woman wearing a scarf, or an old crone . . . No wait, it's a vase, or maybe two faces . . .


:floorlaugh: @ vase
 
  • #1,020
Breaking news: he sees someone taking a picture

Just one person: Jodi (wearing one of Travis' T-shirts which she later threw into the wash because it was so bloody)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
131
Guests online
3,091
Total visitors
3,222

Forum statistics

Threads
632,199
Messages
18,623,455
Members
243,055
Latest member
michelle cathleen
Back
Top