Have been rewatching Dworkin's testimony Day 13 (defense forensic computer guy): it seems the pictures defense admitted with JA and sis and JA and dog (to prove JA had brown hair in May 2008) only had "file" info, not "exif" data. The only way to confirm the pics were taken in May 2008 and not before is if there is "exif" data. The "file" data shows the pic was handled in May 2008 (could have been taken earlier and then sent/saved onto memory card in May 2008). IMO these photos were taken earlier and then loaded onto this memory card either so JA could easily upload them to my space , or the camera was new and she loaded photos from computer onto her new camera for easy access, to take to store to make print outs or something. I think JM's forensic computer guy in rebutal will show she is lying about when these photos were taken.
Evidence that confirms these photos were taken before May 2008 comes from JA's MySpace page. If you go to her page and look under photos, album called "my photos", you see a collection of photos loaded on February 27, 2007 and ONE OF THOSE PHOTOS is of JA in the same outfit, with the same dog, front of the same brick wall as IN THE PHOTO ENTERED INTO EVIDENCE AS #414. Now, I guess she could have created this album in 2007 on MySpace and then added this one photo in May 2008? I am not sure if that is possible or not. I thought the date under the album reflected the last time the album was updated, but I am not sure. Maybe someone out there knows.
At any rate, I think JM is on to this and will prove it in rebuttal. He is going to show that JA lied once again about when these photos with her brown hair were taken. IMO he will be able to prove these were likely taken long before May 2008.