trial day 47: the defense continues its case in chief #142

Status
Not open for further replies.
I concur, to let her continue tweeting. However one tweet that I think it is extremely valuable in the future is the one where she references her artwork. She is claiming it as her own which means it's an asset and any money That she gets from selling that asset should go to either paying legal fees or maybe Travis's family will file a civil suit and the money will go to them. Somebody definitely needs to keep those tweets I can't do it on my phone. Can someone screen capture? The ones on JM and NG were deleted over the weekend.

Can they be viewed and captured by looking at the cache? I know less about tweeting than Alyce does.
 
I've been having WS probs on an off today. Several times when I've posted, the message posts but I get rerouted to polling taking. Couldn't reload pages for a while either and had to reboot.

Welcome back :) Hate when that happens!
 
I'm almost hoping that these enlarged pictures get in.

Can you IMAGINE being a juror and the defense team is trying to get you to see something of significant in the reflection of someones eye?!?!?!?!

It would just add to the picture of a desperate team trying ANYTHING to spare her.
 
There is also over a minute, that's forever in that situation, between the face shot and the sitting in the shower shot. I do believe she had ample time to take a weapon out of her pocket or out of her hiding place.

So IMO it's a non-issue, just like 90% of the defense's case

I hope she lets it in on the RGB screen so the jury can get a giggle. JA did what she said she did on a single subject before the fog rolled in. It's not like she could say she took the picture from across the street or while standing in the closet anyway. It's so pathetic, it's tragic which is why I hope it gets in. Nothing to appeal, nothing to whine about.
 
I see nothing posted on JA's Twitter Account during past two days. Correct?
 
Well, after witnessing this mornings' waste of time, it makes me wonder if...


Dr. Hippocampus will diagnose himself with PTSD, since the "big bad ol' meany" prosecutor had the audacity to interview him.

Second, bring back ALV and let her READ the transcripts, and let us know which one of the three participants were raising their voices.....

oh wait, Wilma was in there too, so she will be the victim, without a doubt.

Katie, get that Orville picture I sent you signed. You know you want to. ;)

Lol someone needs to run up to nurmi to request a photo shoot and see what he does lol
 
LOL! I've been known to wear ruffled shirts and bathing suit tops because I am small busted. Ruffles make "things" appear bigger, so when I saw the Nurmi wearing ruffles I thought "oh no.... major fashion faux paus!!"

Reminds me of the Seinfeld episode of the 'puffy shirt', lol.:floorlaugh:
 
Any ideas about the closed hearing with ALV? Is this regarding additional testimony?

She had a choice to show up today or tomorrow. Perhaps she chose today. And her testimony has to be before the jury according to the judge last Friday, so perhaps that is what will happen at 1.30, after the meeting.
 
I think these 2 days show that there was something being watched for re: ALV's testimony

If you look at the last couple of minutes, from around the 13:50 min. mark, and then go the very beginning of the next day, ALV goes right back to refusing to admit to a Quote, really hard to believe that the Def hadn't told her to stop being so obstinate <sp?>

Regardless of her finally getting a Yes dragged out of her, minutes later she goes right back, and its the one where she just refuses to admit that the word Stalker is written in her paper

BTW, the below youtube has the sidebars and time-outs removed, in the full version during the break, ALV, Nurmi and JW exit the court room and likely told ALV to go ahead and say Yes

at 13:50 -stalking/fear
Jodi Arias Trial : Day 43 : Martinez Vs. LaViolette : Part 14 Of 14 (No Sidebars)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIeUBVIWdks

Jodi Arias Trial : Day 44 : Martinez Vs. LaViolette : Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ft2JUoj2eEA

JM does TA indicate Extremely Fearful of JA Stalking

ALV: still refuses

JM: Judge may we discuss the question/ break 5 minutes, ALV exits with DefTeam, comes back and finally says "He was afraid of her, YES"
JM, because of her Stalking
ALV: Yes


then ALV goes right back to her refusal to answer, even refuses to admit that the word Stalking is in column 5
=============================================

The reason why I see a lot of importance in this echange between ALV and JM, that went overnight and began first thing the next day, is because JM rarely has asked to Approach, and it was for something it looks like he had previously alerted to watch for, knowing that ALV would continue to refuse, no matter it its only to admit that Quoted words exist
 
What a COLLOSAL waste of the court's time.

If honestly Nurmi thought he was going to get anywhere with either of these 2 motions, I highly recommend anyone thinking of hiring him rethink it.

Or is this the type of stuff the defense MUST do in order to present the best case? It seems so strange to most of us, but maybe there is in fact some legal basis for it????

I'm not worried. I think all the attorneys are familiar with the "games" that must be played in an adversarial trial. I also think that after this is over, they may slap each other on the back and go have a drink together.
 
Wow...just caught up on the HLN live blog. WTF was that expert talking about with Travis's eye? I thought I saw the image of Jodi (really clearly, too!), until he outlined it and it was nothing REMOTELY like the place/size that I saw it lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
174
Guests online
876
Total visitors
1,050

Forum statistics

Threads
626,637
Messages
18,530,055
Members
241,103
Latest member
Dominica
Back
Top