trial day 47: the defense continues its case in chief #143

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #401
I thought they were gonna discuss ALV today regardless if she was there or not, and she had her choice of days to show up for testimony on what ever the issue is.....MO
 
  • #402
I think she delayed her ruling on that until she read some new comments made to some rule or something.

Correct she wanted to do some more research on the matter. Specially committee comments on a local Evidence Rules.
 
  • #403
I wonder about the world my fellow WSers.

I don't know WTF is wrong with people today. It makes you wonder what the hell makes a person stab a man almost 30 times, slit his throat from hear to ear, and shoot him all because he no longer wants to be with you and is moving on. Or what makes a person place bombs at a city Marathon to kill possibly hundreds of innocent marathoners.

WTF is wrong with people????

Every time I turn on the computer and see the news exactly that goes through my head. Every single time - WTF is wrong with people?!?
 
  • #404
He really is anti JM. Wonder why?
Seems like it. I think he's a friend of Katiecoolady's and IMO she's such a beautiful human being, I figure Michael Kiefer must be a nice person (even if he doesn't like JM) if KKL calls him her friend.
 
  • #405
He really is anti JM. Wonder why?

Kiefer really has a bias problem, which makes me have a huge problem with him! Or maybe he just has a crush on Jodi.
 
  • #406
she denied the motion for a mistrial on Juan's rock star status,but said she wanted to do more research on the eye testimony..
 
  • #407
The judge ruled this morning, the testimony from the "eye guy" is out. Denied.

I thought she said she had to review the 702 guidelines (I think that's what they're called) for admissability prior to her ruling? I think she was going to do that over the lunch break?
 
  • #408
Judge has not publicly ruled on the eye guy, she said she wanted to review Rule 702 update that was made in Jan.

Not sure if she ruled during this closed hearing but she did not rule when the cameras were on.
 
  • #409
I just wanted to let you know that you're not going to miss a thing. We're going to hit the pause button so you don't miss any action.

When we come back from break we're going to hit the play button and allow 2 mins of testimony to play and then hit the pause button again. Don't worry though because you're not going to miss anything....WE PROMISE.

EXACTLY! :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh: Arggggggggggggh
 
  • #410
  • #411
  • #412
WAT still waiting outside.. says Brian was called back in..

I think that if the DT tries to put this weird eye thing out there, the jury is going to smell their desperation.
 
  • #413
who's Bryan??

Bryan Neumeister, a guy who sees murderesses in the eyes of their victims.

To paraphrase the Sixth Sense: "I see dead people [before they're convicted and executed.]"
 
  • #414
I have totally missed something.. and I've been here all day. When did ALV change her day from Tuesday to Monday??

Judge said she didn't care which day ALV showed up....guess today was better. Good. Get this carp over with and move on with the actual trial:great:
Justice for Travis.
Spankings for the "Delaying Duo".....

:moo:
 
  • #415
For those that have margin problems, I don't have margin issues, so don't understand the phenomenon, I just have the disappearing/non-working Thanks button issue.

Anyway, a mod (((HUGS CHICO))) took care of the picture and all quotes for us and I apologize, I did not mean to de-edify your margins with my posting behavior or the subsequent quotes that continued the assault on your experience. Please carry on and write positive things about me in your journals. I can tell that is frustrating when it happens, and I really am sorry ((((HUGS))))
 
  • #416
Kiefer really has a bias problem, which makes me have a huge problem with him! Or maybe he just has a crush on Jodi.

As long as he doesn't dig Jodi ... I don't care


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #417
  • #418
To answer the questions I've seen in the last couple of pages, AZ recently adopted a new rule of evidence re: experts. The judge is making sure she understands the changes before ruling. IMO this eye guy should be out under either version. ;)
 
  • #419
I heard something about a Rule 702.... by the Judge...

does that mean anything to anyone?

:dunno:

Rule 702. Testimony by Experts

If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of
fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness
qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education,
may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.

http://www.arizonacrimelaws.com/e702.htm
 
  • #420
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
55
Guests online
1,402
Total visitors
1,457

Forum statistics

Threads
632,382
Messages
18,625,498
Members
243,125
Latest member
JosBay
Back
Top